[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

> Paul, I believe message #26409 answered your question? > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/26409 > > Pardon me if I'm wrong, as it was just a quick glance. > > Frank, K2NCC Thank you Frank. I did miss that. It tells me the configuration file will not be overwritten which i

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

I would certainly agree to that. I am not a new user of digital or logging software, having used several over the past decade, but every time I attempt to go to Multipsk, I am put off by just too much on the screen at one time. A tabbing system would certainly be one better way. I particularly li

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Warriner wrote: > > > > Thanks Much!!! > > Wow! all these 4.7 Multipsk posts after I asked my question - and no > answer. So I'll try again. Paul, I believe message #26409 answered

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Warriner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Much!!! Wow! all these 4.7 Multipsk posts after I asked my question - and no answer. So I'll try again. What is the best way to install the update over a pre-existing registered version. DXLab is slick. You j

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Thanks Much!!! At 04:45 PM 1/31/2008, you wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 6:59 PM, Les Warriner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!! Les, the main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Touche!! Patrick. I enjoy using your program. Rick W3BI - Original Message From: Patrick Lindecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:00:03 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK Hello Frank a

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Nice post Jose. I must also add that the algorithms written by Patrick are some of the most sophisticated I have ever seen for software based audio decoding. His A1A decoder is one of the best I have ever used. -- JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx) Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

On Jan 31, 2008 6:59 PM, Les Warriner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!! Les, the main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR: http://multipsk.eqth.info/index.html (click on "United States Download Site #1"). -- JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manch

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

I began using MultiPSK a few months ago when Sholto was looking for help with some propagation monitoring on 30 meters. He has a program that works in conjunction with MultiPSK to automatically post spots on . Prior to trying and registering MultiPSK I had

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

, PSE send me a mail to <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Tooner To: <mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 7:53 PM Subject: [digitalradi

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 7:53 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Frank, > > >Windows - No Disk Exceptio

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Hi Patrick, I agree. You do an awesome job. Thank you so much for your hard work on our behalf! 73 Al WB2JEP -- Original message -- From: "Demetre Valaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hell

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Wow. This totally went off-track from the original spirit of the posts. It's turned into mostly likes/dislikes versus what people are actually *doing* with each program. Thanks to those who answered, particularly to the developers who's time is valued. What do you say we call this a dead horse

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Frank and all, > > I don't think Multipsk deserves all these mails. Hi Patrick, I find the GUI in MULTIPSK the best of all. It looks like a DIGITAL MODEM and I can go to any mode I want with a single cl

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

- > *From:* Tooner <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, January 31, 2008 4:23 AM > *Subject:* [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK > > --- In

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

There are bridges that allow direct logging from MixW and DM780 to DXKeeper. MultiPSK interoperates directly with DXLab without the need for a bridge application, and works with SpotCollector as well as with DXKeeper and Commander. 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Frank, > > >Windows - No Disk Exception Processing Message 0xc013 Parameters > Did you have this problem at the second starting? Or is it permanent each time you start it? Every time I start it. f

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Hi Frank, The reason that many of us use Multipsk is because it really is the only available program of its kind. No other program has all those modes available in one program at any price. In addition, some of the modes are specific to Multipsk and not available anywhere else. So if you want

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

, 2008 4:23 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MultiPSK has a lot more in it than just the ALE Frank. That's cool, and I can appreciate that. I've played wi

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

l help with right click, QRGs, actual configuration...). " 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Tooner To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:57 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK MultiPSK gives an error

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

> Any big fans of MULTIPSK that might like offer why they use it? I'm > guessing you're using it for the ALE applications? I have made the test of running multipsk in parallel with winpsk and other psk31 software. The programs were set up to decode the same signals on 40m. Then i did compare th

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Tooner wrote: > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> ... but what it does and how it does. >> ... And certainly MultiPSK does its stuff WELL >> ... as a peek at its specs will show you. > > How about telling us what that 'stuff' is, as you are

RE: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

ahh I am of "that certain age" but UI could also apply to me as (u)n(i)tiated hi hi tnx Simon John VE5MU User Interface, also known as GUI (Graphical User Interface) when compared with an old VT-100 type terminal interface or even a teletype for those of a 'certain age'. Simon

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

User Interface, also known as GUI (Graphical User Interface) when compared with an old VT-100 type terminal interface or even a teletype for those of a 'certain age'. Simon Brown, HB9DRV - Original Message - From: John Bradley qu'est-ce que "UI"?

RE: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

qu'est-ce que "UI"? John VE5MU From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Brown Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:00 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK To be able

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMO the user community should be very grateful to Patrick No doubt. There's no complaint in providing the service, as each programmer has given many of us new things to try, and the ability to work with what we previ

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

To do everything users want could easily take several years at 60 hours a week plus the associated costs which are not inconsiderable. Simon Brown, HB9DRV - Original Message - From: "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To provide the ultimate software would require a team of three or f

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

To be able to provide the remarkable number of modes in MultiPSK *and* have a UI conforming to the Windows usability guidelines is verging on the impossible, especially once you factor in supporting users and maintaining websites. IMO the user community should be very grateful to Patrick for th

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Frank, Here's a rundown of some of the more interesting and maybe offbeat things you can do with MultiPSK that you can't do in other programs: Weak signal modes - There are a variety of interesting modes suitable for weak signal/QRP work. These include a modified version of PSK

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Kevin O'Rorke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Those who complain about the UI really need to go away and use another Program. Sorry Kevin, in this country, our opinions are equal. In theory at least. "Those who complain.." don't just get up and leave we bitc

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For me personally MultiPSK allows me to enjoy ham radio my way. I like > to experiment and be on the edge of new digimode technology and > concepts. The learning curve keeps my mind sharp. I can appreciate that! S

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... but what it does and how it does. > ... And certainly MultiPSK does its stuff WELL > ... as a peek at its specs will show you. How about telling us what that 'stuff' is, as you are more familiar than I? Specif

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

For me personally MultiPSK allows me to enjoy ham radio my way. I like to experiment and be on the edge of new digimode technology and concepts. The learning curve keeps my mind sharp. I can also talk to Patrick as a fellow amateur and suggest things and he takes the time and courtesy to addres

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Tooner wrote: > MultiPSK gives an error in Vista 64-bit: > > "Windows - No Disk > Exception Processing Message 0xc013 Parameters > ... > Cancel, Try Again, Continue" > > Selecting either will still pull up the program. Seems to work fine. > > Not a biggie, but in case someone else is using

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

I gave it a try for the first time about a year ago. It was very confusing for a first time user. Rather then have the main screen loaded with all the modes I think it would be a lot better the have a drop down under a mode button with settings. But that just me. I deleted it from the system an

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MultiPSK has a lot more in it than just the ALE Frank. That's cool, and I can appreciate that. I've played with most of the common digital modes software and have to say MultiPSK has a lot of 'meat' to it. However,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Hi Frank, I have had older versions in 32 bit Vista with similar error messages but it seemed to work. I normally have been staying with my WinXP box since I have the sound card and USB ports connected to that computer and moving them back and forth is not trivial. Lately, with version 4.6 I d

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Hi Frank, I am running it under Vista on this box without any problems. I like Multipsk for a variety of reasons. It offers many modes and despite what some claim is a "cluttered" interface, I prefer being able to change modes without fighting through numerous pull-down menus. Suspect the biggest

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Sholto Fisher wrote: Tooner wrote: MultiPSK gives an error in Vista 64-bit: "Windows - No Disk Exception Processing Message 0xc013 Parameters ... Cancel, Try Again, Continue" Selecting either will still pull up the program. Seems to work fine. Not a biggie, but in case someone else is

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Tooner wrote: > MultiPSK gives an error in Vista 64-bit: > > "Windows - No Disk > Exception Processing Message 0xc013 Parameters > ... > Cancel, Try Again, Continue" > > Selecting either will still pull up the program. Seems to work fine. > > Not a biggie, but in case someone else is usin

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

MultiPSK gives an error in Vista 64-bit: "Windows - No Disk Exception Processing Message 0xc013 Parameters ... Cancel, Try Again, Continue" Selecting either will still pull up the program. Seems to work fine. Not a biggie, but in case someone else is using the same O/S, let us know if you s

[digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK > Patrick, Would you please outline the best way to update Multipsk. I don't do it very often and where the files go gets confusing. For example, do we download your file, expand