Alan, please carry on the debate with someone else. I have spent a huge
amount of time on this issue, trying to help in whatever way I can,
although I do not have all the answers, obviously. I need to do
something other than sit in front of this computer all day!
Have fun,
73 - Skip KH6TY
>>>8P9RY comments below
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Trevor .
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:21 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SS definitions
--- On Wed, 10/3/10, KH6TY mai
KH6TY wrote:
>
>
> Alan, though we may disagree as to the amount or nature of FHSS in ROS,
Actually, I think we agree, just for different reasons. I really don't
care about ROS. But do care about dangerous precedents. :-)
> the bottom line is that the FCC engineers, as well as the ARRL
> engineers
Trevor, I might add that it is often the practice in this country for a
higher court just to either reaffirm or remand a lower court decision,
instead of issuing a differing decision itself. I am sure that the FCC,
as a government body, also adheres to this practice. That is why the
original de
Engineers that work for the FCC, of course. Their names are not
ordinarily revealed and the mouthpiece of the FCC is a customer service
agent (and for some amateur matters, the ARRL, who relays information
from the FCC offices). This structure should be fairly obvious to anyone
with experience
--- On Wed, 10/3/10, KH6TY wrote:
> Alan, though we may disagree as to the amount or nature of FHSS in ROS,
> the bottom line is that the FCC engineers, as well as the ARRL engineers,
> reviewed both the documentation and the signal footprint, and have
> concluded it is FHSS.
Who are these "FC
Alan, though we may disagree as to the amount or nature of FHSS in ROS,
the bottom line is that the FCC engineers, as well as the ARRL
engineers, reviewed both the documentation and the signal footprint, and
have concluded it is FHSS. While their opinion might be changed through
dialog, that is
I'll preface this by saying that I'm not trying to defend or crucify
ROS. But when we are dealing with definitions & the FCC, it's very
important we be clear & accurate on our definitions.
KH6TY wrote:
> By definition, it is SS "if" the pattern is independently generated
> from the data.
One test