iPhone;458260 Wrote:
> Exactly. Well said and a nice post Aubuti.
>
> Anybody else notice that this post has been semi-hijacked into a Touch
> discussion? I hope that is an indication of how much people are looking
> forward to the new Squeezeboxes.
Shinny new things are always attractive.
--
I see lots of people agreeing with each other that 'N' is unnecessary
for music, which it certainly is from a bandwidth point of view. But in
many dense urban areas, the whole 2.4GHz band is pretty much unusable!
Everyone seems to have a wireless router, usually on a fixed, but
randomly chosen cha
Pale Blue Ego;458236 Wrote:
> I would just tell them to get the Boom and use it with SqueezeNetwork.
true life story - i have made 2 people very happy with that suggestion.
one of them only listens to free radio, the other has become a Pandora
addict... and *both* discovered moderate audiophile
Sebastian,
Thanks for the 0.99 update. The screen looks just fine now on the
iPAQ-6945. Ok about the settings dialog - I can just scroll down to see
all the items so it's no big deal. As far as I can tell it works right
out of the box, but I'll continue to check for some more stuff later.
Geoff.
aubuti;458245 Wrote:
> Right. And you can also use the SB Touch like an SB Controller,
> controlling other SBs you have around the house.
>
> As for the scanning being slower on an attached USB vs an internal IDE
> or SATA disk, of course you're right. But the people who will use the
> TinySC op
msherman;458247 Wrote:
> Are there any other recommendations out there? I looked into this one,
> and the google results aren't uniformly good.
Could we have a little more information? As in what speakers you are
trying to drive, what you expect them to do, how you want them to sound
(background
msherman;458247 Wrote:
> Are there any other recommendations out there? I looked into this one,
> and the google results aren't uniformly good.
If you're concerned with complaints about the auto-sensing being too
sensitive, so that it cuts out on quiet passages, don't be. Just use
Input 2, not In
You might not need autoswitching. I have one of the original Sonic
Impact T-Amps (out of production now), and it draws so little power when
nothing's playing that it's not worth bothering to switch it off when
the Squeezebox is silent. I don't remember if the Kill-A-Watt even
registered a single w
Are there any other recommendations out there? I looked into this one,
and the google results aren't uniformly good.
--
msherman
msherman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11966
View this thread: h
froth;458229 Wrote:
> Using a USB drive is an option but not needed. You can use your Touch
> just like you use your SB3 and have a server running.
Right. And you can also use the SB Touch like an SB Controller,
controlling other SBs you have around the house.
As for the scanning being slower o
Andy8421;451817 Wrote:
> Damager,
>
>
>
>
> Transporter (wired) - no problems
> SB3 (wireless) - occasional problems
> Duet (2 of them, wireless) hopeless until the last couple of releases,
> still not great
> Boom (2 of them wireless) - occasional problems
>
> Given the new products that Lo
I would just tell them to get the Boom and use it with SqueezeNetwork.
--
Pale Blue Ego
Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthrea
Declan Moriarty;458226 Wrote:
> .
>
> With the new server software in the Touch, it appears that anybody
> having an existing installation can't use the Touch without transfering
> there library to the Touch and USB drive combination? And a Touch
> would'nt like a SB3 + Boom + SC server install
I am happy with my SqueezeBox 3. The touch sounds interesting. The
only thing that worries me about is is the fact that it requires a USB
drive to be plugged in if using the built in server. This would mean
scanning a large music collection would be dreadfully slow compared to a
server using in
erland;457482 Wrote:
> Have you seen the Squeezebox Touch announcement, isn't this more or less
> exactly what you want ? It's able to run a light version of
> SqueezeCenter with the current internal name "TinySC".
i don't want a box that has no webui that i have to "touch" to control.
its "nice
Locuth;458007 Wrote:
> You are so right, so I fixed that issue.
> Registration will need no manual text input anymore.
> The key/serial will have a checksum
>
> SControl should reset the original WiFi state when closed.
It does reset WiFi state for me, just missed it the first few times.
Thanks
The DSbridge solution is purely a Windows solution for application which
use audio. The DSbridge could not be ported to OSX.
The OSX audio subsystems is unique to OSX and probably explains the
paucity of application which can be used to redirect audio.
I don't have an OSX system but then on
I, and many others on the forum, recommend the AudioSource Amp100.
That's what I use to drive 2 pairs of in-ceiling speakers in my
kitchen/dining area. The amp has auto-sensing inputs, sounds very good,
and can easily drive most in-ceiling speakers. Oh, and it's a great
value, because it's usually
Same problem.
Please let us know if anybody finds a solution.
thanks
--
marbin
marbin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32810
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=54131
Goodsounds;458121 Wrote:
> I generally agree with your comments here but not this one. I'd bet the
> decision driver here for the company is maximum interoperability, not
> component cost. The cost is not that significant, and what is at issue
> is a strategic market decision. So long as G router
If you can't downsize on the fly: (and that would be a serious Apple
oversight)
Hold the "shift" key while starting iTunes.
This will present a dialog that let's you choose/create iTunes
libraries, allowing you to "toggle" between the good and the
down-sampled libraries.
P
--
pski
real ster
If you want to investigate a really cheap
firewall/vpn/routing/filtering/anti-virus/anti-spam solution, see
IP-Cop.
It's a free, web-administered Linux distro that can run on (sub)
bare-bones hardware with very little memory (read <64MB.)
Two network adapters are recommended (but not required.)
mherger;458107 Wrote:
> > The hardware is completely different, there would be no way to have
> > SqueezeOS back ported to a Harmony remote.
>
> It's not impossible. I remember some well known community member having
>
> done it.
Really?? I remember people getting various IR stuff working on a
That option is there for my Shuffle but it's not available on my iPod
Classic or iPhone. Apple... (shakes fist).
--
jdanforth
jdanforth's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32805
View this thread: ht
mherger;458107 Wrote:
> It's not impossible. I remember some well known community member having
>
> done it.
Really? I missed that :)
I just remember someone, and I think it was a Logitech employee, saying
they were completely different animals.
I do think it would be exciting if the hardware
I use the "Allowed IP Addresses" option. If the client is not at an
address (range) in the list, they don't even get a response to a connect
request.
--
pski
real stereo
pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/membe
The idea to support wireless-n can make sense, if users prefer to make
their future setup in a wireless-n _only_ system. They obviously can't
do that if they buy squeezebox gear that requires wireless-g.
Wireless-n is approved ... and within the next year things will move in
that direction. Slimd
Thanks bpa, I hadn't seen that. But I've never used Parallels and don't
really intend to. I'd be much happier with something running natively on
Mac OSX.
--
whitman
whitman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.p
Yes, unfortunately SC will not work with 320x320.
It does not properly recognize that screen.
Eventually I will switch to another dev-environmwent which supports
WM5x and WM6x natively. But not too soon.
Many thanks again to DeWayne who helped me figure things out.
--
Locuth
Use your PDA/Pho
Any recent development of 320x320?
/D
--
deriksen
deriksen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30765
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=62486
_
iPhone;458101 Wrote:
>
> Will that be before or after G cards are no longer available, I can't
> say but I'm betting it will be later rater then sooner (I would bet cost
> and only cost will drive any change to N).
I generally agree with your comments here but not this one. I'd bet the
decision
I seem to remember there being a box to check (copy files at lower rate)
when syncing my Nano. This would allow you to keep the files on you
computer at the higher rate and not take up so much space on the
player.
I don't remember seeing this option when syncing my wife's iPhone.
And I don't know
iPhone wrote:
> Draft N approved doesn't necessarily mean
Its been formally approved for what, 48 hours?
This whole discussion is silly. 11g is fine for music.
> As for retrofitting, I can't speak for Logitech but I can almost
> guarantee that you'll never see that happen.
In what world does it
I think that the title is probably misleading
Here's what I have:
One iTunes library with about 500GB of Apple Lossless music.
One Logitech Squeezebox v2
iPods, iPhones, etc.
Here's what I want to do:
I want to make a library of compressed tracks (AAC) to sync on my
phones, iPods, etc.
I want t
> The hardware is completely different, there would be no way to have
> SqueezeOS back ported to a Harmony remote.
It's not impossible. I remember some well known community member having
done it.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
h
iPhone;458101 Wrote:
>
> Again these are my opinions and considering that N doesn't make that
> much difference to the device's performance I wouldn't look for a change
> anytime soon.
Whereas on the other hand, upgrading your old G access point to a
modern N class one can make great improvement
"'Next generation' wi-fi approved",according to the BBC Tech blog.
my Belkin router is Draft N approved,will Logitech be upgrading their
wireless transmitters?,and will there be a retrograde fit mod
available.
dennis
--
dennis55
-
Hey Chris
480x800 is being tested.
Can you explain a little more about the 'predictive' part of the
predictive search. I have an idea, but don't know whether that's what
you want.
As to the player power, maybe something like below ?
+
dennis55;458084 Wrote:
> "'Next generation' wi-fi approved",according to the BBC Tech blog.
> my Belkin router is Draft N approved,will Logitech be upgrading their
> wireless transmitters?,and will there be a retrograde fit mod
> available.
>
> dennis
Draft N approved doesn't necessarily mean t
the-ninth;458066 Wrote:
> Hmmm, but the server for streaming clients would remain open, wouldn't
> it?
It seems I am wrong, at least the Squeeze Mobile software on the iPhone
seems to have an authentication option, which probably corresponds to
the user authentication of the user interface.
I w
Did anything ever happen with this bug? I notice the digital VU meters
on my SB2 don't go as high when listening to music with ReplayGain tags.
I've added my vote to the bug.
--
IMGrant
IMGrant's Profile: http://forums.sli
Hi,
for your roadmap (as per our email discussion):
1) Support for 800x480.
2) Predictive search - can't think of the correct name for the search
mechanism, but as used in the contacts screen of SPB Mobile Shell.
3) The ability to switch the player off.
Excellent so far... one day in.
Cheers,
sebp;458022 Wrote:
> Rather than opening you SqueezeCenter to the world, you'd better set a
> 'VPN' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_private_network) up.
> Nobody but the VPN key holders would be able to connect to it.
The iPhone has VPN support, so from the client side that actually might
Mnyb;458019 Wrote:
> You can enable password protection for the web-UI. But the offered
> security level might not be the highest possible
Hmmm, but the server for streaming clients would remain open, wouldn't
it?
Regards, Robert
--
the-ninth
Relevant Equipment: Synology DS-408; SqueezeCent
And the Harmony 1000 too.
--
CharlieG
CharlieG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32439
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67879
__
Looks perfect.
Actually meaning to dig out an old Dell Axim x50v that must be in a
draw somewhere to try that with it too running at 640x480.
The predictive text works by searching for any character mapped to the
key in any part of the list text.
So on a standard phone keypad a single press of
dennis55;458084 Wrote:
> "'Next generation' wi-fi approved",according to the BBC Tech blog.
> my Belkin router is Draft N approved,will Logitech be upgrading their
> wireless transmitters?,and will there be a retrograde fit mod
> available.
>
> dennis
I'll stick my neck out and say: no.
This do
The hardware is completely different, there would be no way to have
SqueezeOS back ported to a Harmony remote. Basically you would need to
turn a Controller into a Harmony, rather than turning a Harmony into a
Controller.
I've never used a harmony remote, but I guess they could change their
inter
Just thinking aloud... er.. in type.
Wouldn't it be cool if the new touch interface would run on the Harmony
1100 remote?
--
kanoot
kanoot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4324
View this thread:
Rather than opening you SqueezeCenter to the world, you'd better set a
'VPN' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_private_network) up.
Nobody but the VPN key holders would be able to connect to it.
--
sebp
System : Mac Mini for ripping to FLAC (XLD) > SqueezeCenter 7.3 running
on a ReadyNAS N
You can enable password protection for the web-UI.
But the offered security level might not be the highest possible
--
Mnyb
No it can NOT be controlled with iTunes
---
I just put in-ceiling speakers in my kitchen, so now I'm looking for an
amp to drive them with my SB3. I'd like one that will either auto-sense
the audio out from the SB3 and turn itself on and off, or one whose
power can be controlled by the geekport output on the sb3.
I don't need to drive any
Hi,
When opening the router/firewall to allow Internet access to
SqueezeCenter (for example for playback via Squeeze Mobile), do you
think that would create any liability issues?
Since as far as I know there is no authentication mechanism built into
SqueezeCenter basically everybody could access
Spent another 2 weeks burried deep in the guts of SlimControl.
5 helpful users will be testing it, especially the new screen
resolutions.
(Added support for 240x240 screens.)
So - inshallah - SControl 1.0 will go online pretty soon.
There'll be many new things to see.
Sebastian
--
Locuth
Us
EricBergan;457349 Wrote:
>
>
> - for the registration key, don't use capital 'O' and zero '0' - you'll
> save yourself some support problems. Also look out for l and 1
>
> - Maybe an option to have the app turn back off wifi if it turned it
> on?
>
> Other than that, looking good so far!
>
>
There are two stages of reset.
slow flashing red and if hold it still longer then fast flashing red.
usually it should be enough with slow flash reach setup.
Otherwise reset both the controller and the receiver and start over.
Or use an ethernet cable and the NET::UDAP utility (search this foru
Hi,
are there any news on getting the dsbridge solution to run under WINE?
I see the same when running netstat as Ramage does.
Could it be that another dll in wine needs to be set to native instead
of builtin regarding the http-server part in the dll?
--
woodster
57 matches
Mail list logo
