Re: [PSES] Regulatory requirements and internal use

2017-11-02 Thread Pete Perkins
Curt, I presume your comment that the product ‘designed and built in China which has regulatory approvals’ means that you have broad safety and EMC certifications rather than specific certs (e.g. China only). The addition of the radio complicates the issues

[PSES] China RoHS

2017-11-02 Thread Dan Roman
Hello List Members, China has released their first catalog of equipment for RoHS. Previously the China RoHS 2 regulations in China put just about everything in scope with some exemptions for categories like space, power, military equipment, etc. which was very similar to EU RoHS. Categorie

Re: [PSES] Regulatory requirements and internal use

2017-11-02 Thread Nyffenegger, Dave
If the device is used in the US workplace then OSHA rules would still apply which would require a NRTL certification if applicable and equivalent in Canada. Adding the radio may impact the existing NRTL certification of the device if there is one. If the radio/device is only low power/low vo

[PSES] Regulatory requirements and internal use

2017-11-02 Thread mcnam025 University of Minnesota
I have been asked to comment on the following: -- we have a device designed and built in China which has regulatory approvals -- we want to add a low power radio to this device (chip down or certified module are options) -- the end device is only for use within our corporation. This includes franch

Re: [PSES] Regulatory requirements for MOVs - 62368 - surge protective device and surge protective component confusion

2017-11-02 Thread mickm
Dear Pete, Unfortunately the IEC 62368-1 language does not conform the to surge protection terms established by the IEC surge protection subcommittees SC 37A (Low-voltage surge protective devices) and SC 37B (Components for low-voltage surge protection). Notice one subcommittee deals with