On Tuesday, 26 April 2005, at 17:00:31 (-0600),
Tres Melton wrote:
> I'll do my best but I'm still learning cvs, diff, patch, etc.. The
> other coding that I've done was part of a small group where cvs
> wasn't as important and we could always meet around the lunch table.
cd eterm/Eterm
cvs diff
I just checked out the new code and noticed that you basically did what
I did in 1. and 2. I think your solution is a bit more readable.
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 13:59 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2005, at 05:46:39 (-0600),
> Tres Melton wrote:
>
> > 3. eterm-0.9.3-shade
I just checked out the new code and noticed that you basically did what
I did in 1. and 2. I think your solution is a bit more readable.
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 13:59 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2005, at 05:46:39 (-0600),
> Tres Melton wrote:
>
> > 3. eterm-0.9.3-shade
On Tuesday, 26 April 2005, at 05:46:39 (-0600),
Tres Melton wrote:
> 3.eterm-0.9.3-shade_24_mmx.patch
> 4.eterm-0.9.3-shade_24_mmx-2.patch
> The first one adds an MMX optimized assembly routine for shading an
> Eterm w/ 24 bit color. The second modifies pixmap.c to use the new
> rou