> Hi everyone, I am a complete layman but still got the illusion that
> maybe one day I would be able to understand the probability part of MW
> if explained in a simple way. I know it's the most controversal part
> of MW and that there are several competing understandings of
> probability in MW,
Hi everyone, I am a complete layman but still got the illusion that
maybe one day I would be able to understand the probability part of MW
if explained in a simple way. I know it's the most controversal part
of MW and that there are several competing understandings of
probability in MW, but still:
Hi Günther,
> unfortunately I can't participate a lot at the moment because I'm quite
> busy, but I try to follow some of the discussion, and would like to
> pose
> a question (to Bruno):
>
>>> Which is why I think philosophical zombies
>>> are impossible.
>
> I also think they are impossible,
Hi Jason,
Le 04-nov.-08, à 23:21, Jason Resch a écrit :
> Bruno,
>
> Thanks I understand now. I must have misread previous posts of yours
> because I had thought you had said "if I = the world, then the world
> is not turing-emulable", but what you are saying is that "if I = the
> world and
4 matches
Mail list logo
