Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread David Nyman
On 13 Apr 2017 2:56 p.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 13 Apr 2017, at 13:35, David Nyman wrote: On 13 April 2017 at 10:09, Bruno Marchal wrote: > Oops. > > Yet, you asked me about the modal logic, and I do think at some point I > have to say precisely

Re: What are atheists for?

2017-04-13 Thread Quentin Anciaux
After ten years of peepee talk, you should have left this list... nothing interesting came from you and nothing will... when you're wrong, you simply ignore it and go back in a loop. On the other side, I'm still confuse after that much time of dumb talk, Bruno still wants to try to argue with

Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread David Nyman
On 12 April 2017 at 20:59, Bruno Marchal wrote: 2 ^(2^9) * (3^2) * (5^17) * (7^2) * (11^21) *(13^2) * (17*17) * 3 ^ > ​Oh, I see what you mean: 3 ^(2^17) * (3^0) * (5^21) * (7^0)​ * (11^17) PS Are "(" and ")" meant to be the same? David -- You

Re: What are atheists for?

2017-04-13 Thread John Clark
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​> ​ > I did just bet to a friend that your answer would contain the word > "peepee". I win! > ​And I bet the same mythical friend that every post of yours would either contain a peepee personal pronoun, accuse me of

Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread David Nyman
On 12 April 2017 at 20:59, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2017, at 18:21, David Nyman wrote: > > On 10 April 2017 at 18:32, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> On 10 Apr 2017, at 12:58, David Nyman wrote: >> >> Over the years there have been many references to

Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 13 Apr 2017, at 14:11, David Nyman wrote: On 12 April 2017 at 20:59, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 11 Apr 2017, at 18:21, David Nyman wrote: On 10 April 2017 at 18:32, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 10 Apr 2017, at 12:58, David Nyman wrote: Over the years

Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread David Nyman
On 13 April 2017 at 14:56, Bruno Marchal wrote: Hmm You seem to want to replace the Outer-God, by the Inner-God. That > is a risky move toward solipsim. S4Grz does not see the gap, but it does > not see the other minds either. ​But that's just it. We cannot ever "see"

Re: What are atheists for?

2017-04-13 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 13 Apr 2017, at 15:53, John Clark wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​ ​>> ​you blundered at the ​kindergarten​ ​level. ​> ​Prove it, and without blurring the 1p and 3p. ​Peepee tends not to have sharp edges, ​it's intrinsically blurry,

Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 13 Apr 2017, at 13:35, David Nyman wrote: On 13 April 2017 at 10:09, Bruno Marchal wrote: Oops. Yet, you asked me about the modal logic, and I do think at some point I have to say precisely what the G box [] is for. It is simple, but long and tedious. I hope you

Re: What are atheists for?

2017-04-13 Thread John Clark
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​ >> ​>> ​ >> you blundered at the ​kindergarten >> ​ ​level. >> > > ​> ​ > Prove it, and without blurring the 1p and 3p. > ​Peepee tends not to have sharp edges, ​it's intrinsically blurry, just like the personal pronouns

Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread David Nyman
On 12 April 2017 at 20:59, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2017, at 18:21, David Nyman wrote: > > On 10 April 2017 at 18:32, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> On 10 Apr 2017, at 12:58, David Nyman wrote: >> >> Over the years there have been many references to

Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread David Nyman
On 13 April 2017 at 10:09, Bruno Marchal wrote: > Oops. > > Yet, you asked me about the modal logic, and I do think at some point I > have to say precisely what the G box [] is for. It is simple, but long and > tedious. I hope you have not too much difficulties with my

Re: Request to Bruno re modal logic

2017-04-13 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 11 Apr 2017, at 18:21, David Nyman wrote: On 10 April 2017 at 18:32, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 10 Apr 2017, at 12:58, David Nyman wrote: ​Good, but I guess I was also asking for some sort of shortcut to the intuitive power of all this, because if the only route

Re: What are atheists for?

2017-04-13 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 12 Apr 2017, at 18:12, John Clark wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​> ​Step 3 is kindergarden level. ​I agree, and yet you blundered at the ​kindergarten​ ​level. Prove it, and without blurring the 1p and 3p. Bruno And that's why