On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 04:03 +0200, HggdH wrote:
> The fixes came from upstream indeed. They are fixes that were
> committed from about March 10th to April 7th (i.e., from the 2.22.00
> release to 2.22.1).
OK, gotcha. I incorrectly assumed that 2.22.1 was already in Hardy.
I'll give it a good work
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:54 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> There was a major update to Hardy today that included all parts of
> Evolution, including e-d-s and evolution-exchange. The bugs listed
> there looked very serious: freeing null pointers and other really
> unpleasant things. There haven't bee
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 13:15 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I can't figure out what's different about Hardy that's causing this
> problem.
There was a major update to Hardy today that included all parts of
Evolution, including e-d-s and evolution-exchange. The bugs listed
there looked very serious: fr
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 08:08 -0700, George Farris wrote:
> I completely agree. I know of myself and at least two others running
> Hardy with Evolution Exchange backend and it is unusable because the
> exchange backend keeps dying.
Are you on 32bit or 64bit systems? Do you have multiple CPUs?
It
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:43 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:14 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Unless something radical happens in the next few weeks to resolve
> > all these problems, I regret to say that this Ubuntu Long-Term
> > Support release will not be anywhere close
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:14 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Unless something radical happens in the next few weeks to resolve all
> these problems, I regret to say that this Ubuntu Long-Term Support
> release will not be anywhere close to ready to deploy in an enterprise
> environment.
I have stayed
