Hey Chris,
Remember when I wrote to you about an issue that I had, and you diagnosed it
as a UDP problem over a firewall, and gave me an article about "new mail
notification"?
Well I finally got the Q article. Q264035
Thanks for all your help,
you al are a GREAT resource
-John Q
- Origina
Multiple NICs in the Exchange box? Are you sniffing for the packets
somewhere where you can definitively say the Exchange server is not sending
the packets?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Ste
ration (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me wha
Could be nic as well.
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
>
>
> Still the router. It has an ACL that only permits
Message-
> From: Jerry Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
>
>
> Thanks for the help - especially the Latin lesson. But, since
> there had been
> no changes to the
TED]>
>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:23:53 -0800
>
>Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam
&g
Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of
I think its "Nixon"
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is?
-
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: New Mail Notification
Subject: RE: New Mail No
The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm
-Original Message-
From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Mail Notification
This has been discussed ad nauseum in the
This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the archives on this
because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the server to the
client.
-Original Message-
From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subjec
Discussions
Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
Um, no.
There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we have another
legacy system that allows those packets through. I'm trying to do research
so my network guys have something to work with.
Kevin
- Origin
Kevin,
As I understand it the port is picked by the client, rather like source
ports, so you'll probably get the next available.
If you want to put notifications through a firewall, it would be best to use
a VPN.
regards,
Richard Dann
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAI
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
>
>
> Um, no.
>
> There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we
Picked randomly by the client.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:24 PM
Subject: New mail notification port(s)
> Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail
> n
> Kevin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:31 PM
> Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
>
>
> > Lemme
but what's coming back
is just some random port >1024.
- Original Message -
From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
&
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s)
> Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least
> host some Exchange services...
>
> It's
Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least
host some Exchange services...
It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. And there's no
way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. Apparently the three lines
(whatever) of code that control this were
Here's a nice explanation.
http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/Topics/86.htm
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:24 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: New mail notification port(s)
Subject: New mail notification po
20 matches
Mail list logo
