-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database
If you are describing a Network Attached Storage
) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database
If you are describing a Network Attached Storage device, step
away from
, 2003 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database
Microsoft Does Not Support Network Attached Storage (NAS)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317173
Microsoft says it will not support the configuration because it can
cause corruption
, January 22, 2003 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database
Microsoft Does Not Support Network Attached Storage (NAS)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317173
Microsoft says it will not support the configuration because it can
cause
Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database
Microsoft Does Not Support Network Attached Storage (NAS)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317173
Microsoft says it will not support the configuration because it can
cause corruption in Exchange databases and degrade
caused but using
a NAS box.
-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 4:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database
Why ?
Probably I'll have to do a transition to a NAS (Hitachi, reselled by HP) sometime
, January 22, 2003 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database
YEA! SAN=GOOD! Now if I could just justify one here!
Miles
---
Miles Holt
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770-303-0426
22, 2003 4:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database
Why ?
Probably I'll have to do a transition to a NAS (Hitachi, reselled by HP)
sometime soon, so I'm somewhat interested :) Obviously I will test
before moving the production databases, though. Heiko
--
-- PREVINET
SAN = Good if the administrators know what the $%^* they are doing and
Jupiter is in the 3rd house with Neptune rising.
On 1/22/03 8:08, ml.exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
YEA! SAN=GOOD! Now if I could just justify one here!
Define external storage system
- Original Message -
From: Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:30 AM
Subject: Moving Exchange Database
I am running exchange 5.5 service pack 4 on NT4
server. We have just acquired an
If you are describing a Network Attached Storage device, step away from
the keyboard.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:31 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Oh, that was funny. Thanks, I needed something to get my morning started.
On 1/21/03 3:30, Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running exchange 5.5 service pack 4 on NT4
server. We have just acquired an external storage
system and a new drive letter is mapped to my exchange
server
12 matches
Mail list logo