RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread Herold Heiko
-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database If you are describing a Network Attached Storage

RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread William Lefkovics
) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database If you are describing a Network Attached Storage device, step away from

RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread Herold Heiko
, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database Microsoft Does Not Support Network Attached Storage (NAS) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317173 Microsoft says it will not support the configuration because it can cause corruption

RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread Herold Heiko
, January 22, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database Microsoft Does Not Support Network Attached Storage (NAS) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317173 Microsoft says it will not support the configuration because it can cause

RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread William Lefkovics
Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database Microsoft Does Not Support Network Attached Storage (NAS) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317173 Microsoft says it will not support the configuration because it can cause corruption in Exchange databases and degrade

RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread ml.exchange
caused but using a NAS box. -Original Message- From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database Why ? Probably I'll have to do a transition to a NAS (Hitachi, reselled by HP) sometime

RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread Roger Seielstad
, January 22, 2003 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database YEA! SAN=GOOD! Now if I could just justify one here! Miles --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426

RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread John Matteson
22, 2003 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database Why ? Probably I'll have to do a transition to a NAS (Hitachi, reselled by HP) sometime soon, so I'm somewhat interested :) Obviously I will test before moving the production databases, though. Heiko -- -- PREVINET

Re: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-22 Thread Chris Scharff
SAN = Good if the administrators know what the $%^* they are doing and Jupiter is in the 3rd house with Neptune rising. On 1/22/03 8:08, ml.exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: YEA! SAN=GOOD! Now if I could just justify one here!

Re: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-21 Thread Andy David
Define external storage system - Original Message - From: Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:30 AM Subject: Moving Exchange Database I am running exchange 5.5 service pack 4 on NT4 server. We have just acquired an

RE: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-21 Thread John Matteson
If you are describing a Network Attached Storage device, step away from the keyboard. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:31 AM Posted To: Exchange

Re: Moving Exchange Database

2003-01-21 Thread Chris Scharff
Oh, that was funny. Thanks, I needed something to get my morning started. On 1/21/03 3:30, Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running exchange 5.5 service pack 4 on NT4 server. We have just acquired an external storage system and a new drive letter is mapped to my exchange server