at 12:14 AM Tommi Prami
mailto:tommi.pr...@suonentieto.fi>> wrote:
Hello,
I was thinking that if there is some kind of header (simple enough) in Firebird
Databases and/or backup files, maybe some one could point me into the right
direction.
I would preferably need (mainly for installer)
same to use our own utility, gstat needs client libraries as well as our own,
so we do not gain anything.
Thanks for info.
-Tee-
-Original Message-
From: Tommi Prami
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 10:21 AM
To: For discussion among Firebird Developers
Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel
Dang...
Try to use GStat instead.
-Tee-
-Original Message-
From: Dimitry Sibiryakov
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 1:11 PM
To: For discussion among Firebird Developers
Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] (possible) Database header
Tommi Prami wrote 23.08.2022 5:40:
> I was thinking t
Hello,
I was thinking that if there is some kind of header (simple enough) in Firebird
Databases and/or backup files, maybe some one could point me into the right
direction.
I would preferably need (mainly for installer) small tool that would check the
ODS version of the DB before I try to con
: API / Client Library
Affects Versions: 2.5.8
Environment: Windows 10
Reporter: Tommi Prami
Priority: Minor
We accidentally updated 2.5.8 client to environment where is older 2.5.7
server.
With field defined as
CREATE DOMAIN CMN_BOOLEAN AS SMALLINT
Reporter: Tommi Prami
Priority: Minor
Would be nice to do this
SELECT CURRENT VALUE FOR CUSTOMER_SEQUENCE FROM RDB$DATABASE
Would be logical (Not sure would it be standard)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly
Environment: any
Reporter: Tommi Prami
Priority: Minor
ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART WITH (SELECT MAX(ID) FROM CUSTOMER);
Sometimes the select is not that start forward, but anyways would do good to be
able to fetch new value with select,
Would make easier to reset the Sequences in
I've said I can provide the DB and needed data if it is kept secret :)
-Tee-
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Vlad Khorsun
wrote:
> 19.09.2016 14:06, Tommi Prami wrote:
> > Weird part was that I actually pumped the data to the empty database and
> it behaved the same.
> >
Weird part was that I actually pumped the data to the empty database and it
behaved the same.
This is more than less puzzling.
And the Backup and restore did not help,. which also, I think, should
recreate the indexes and so on...
-Tee-
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Thomas Steinmaurer
wr
in system tables are :
RDB$UNIQUE_FLAG = 0 RDB$INDEX_INACTIVE = 0 RDB$INDEX_TYPE = 0
And we create it again those are NULL
Do not know if that is an actual cause but difference we see.
-Tee-
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov
wrote:
> 15.09.2016 9:39, Tommi Prami wr
selected but the delete fails on this DB
(Hope this helps)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 15.09.2016 10:14, Tommi Prami wrote:
> > Whole story here :
> >
> > https://plus.google.com/105626236962310493174/posts/3UZB71NjUhA
> >
> >
Whole story here :
https://plus.google.com/105626236962310493174/posts/3UZB71NjUhA
Copy of message
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Is there a tool (or way) to debug database step by step.
Now we have weird situation where delete from one database fails, on
foreign key error, which sounds like
I stumbled upon quite evesome Hash-algorithm xxHash.
There are lightning fast implementations.
https://github.com/Cyan4973/xxHash
Noted that usually the Hash algorithm is not the bottleneck, but still
pretty interesting...
-Tee-
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov
wrote:
> 29
The Hardware AES uses differend MAgic constant (Seed?) that many popular
software implementations (If I recall, reading from somewhere). So the
initial state of non HW accelerated implementation should match the HW one,
that's all.
PS: Can't remember the details just pumped into this one, that I
Just my 0.02€
http://ianix.com/pub/chacha-deployment.html
ChaCha20 is in TSL and OpenSSH etc. and mainly because it is secure and it
is fast.
-Tee-
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:26 PM, James Starkey wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, August 20, 2015, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 02:
If you use {$A+} all fields should appear to aligned to 8 byte boundaries
(The default).
I think would be easier to make it controllable, to use packed record and
add some "Foo Bar" padding variables if needed.
If the original structure is continuous then packed record with correct
field sizes s
16 matches
Mail list logo