> Case in point - to use Rails, you must do things inn VERY specific
ways.
> Rails is all about convention, and if you don't adhere to its
conventions,
> you will be boned.
Not true. For example, one of the conventions Rails uses to make things
easier is their naming conventions, specifically, pl
Thinking about it again, I think you're right on one point. There's
certainly no reason that using their framework should break native Flash
code. That's just sloppy. But, as it is a framework, I think it's totally
legit that it makes you do certain things certain ways.
I wouldn't say XPCompo
" > I think that's false. There are lots of people who are interested in
using frameworks and using them completely.
We have to agree to disagree on this one."
Thinking about it again, I think you're right on one point. There's
certainly no reason that using their framework should break nati
DepthManager and FocusManager cause a few headaches for people used to working
without the MM components. Granted, nowhere near as bad as XP is sounding in
this thread, but still...
-mark hawley
>
> From: "Steven Sacks | BLITZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/29 Thu PM 02:39:22 CDT
> To: "
4 matches
Mail list logo