We might also want to start thinking of an official organization
hierarchy such as:
Aircraft/
LightSingles/
JetFighters/
CommercialJets/
CommercialTurboProps/
Bombers/
WWI/
WWII/
SailPlanes/
Experimental/
For modern military aircrafts, I would make the following hierarchy:
- Fighter
HI, thanx for a great game :)
I am playing flightgear for the last months and i really enjoy it.But i
believe that it lacks something: a menu
I would like when flightgear starts to have a menu, to select _graphically_
which airplane and which airport i would like to use, and to set some other
Ironhell3 . wrote:
HI, thanx for a great game :)
I am playing flightgear for the last months and i really enjoy it.But i
believe that it lacks something: a menu
I would like when flightgear starts to have a menu, to select
_graphically_ which airplane and which airport i would like to use, and
Not to forget the prop liners before the jets.
Also by the by is there any intention of updating to 9.3 in the near
future.Just asking to see whats in the pipe line
Cheers
Innis
Curtis L. Olson writes
We might also want to start thinking of an official organization
hierarchy such as:
Hi All
In an effort to see what 3D models might be in the pipeline and to save
people working on the same model.
Maybe people could say what A/C they have under development(not in your
imagination though).
I am currently working on the 737-300(almost finished) plus panel(half
finished).
After
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Hi All
In an effort to see what 3D models might be in the pipeline and to save
people working on the same model.
Maybe people could say what A/C they have under development(not in your
imagination though).
I am currently working on the 737-300(almost finished)
David Megginson writes:
Tony Peden writes:
/sim/startup/init/position-type : (latlon|airport|navaid|runway)
/sim/startup/init/altitude-type : (msl|agl|glidepath)
/sim/startup/init/orientation-type : (rph|runway)
/sim/startup/init/time-type : (utc|local|sunpos)
Norman Vine writes:
Not really -- the difference is that the actual values
(lat/lon/alt/hpr/airport/navaid/etc.) live in the main property tree,
and these tell us only where we should look for them.
Sounds to me like what is needed is a way to do
$MY_TREE = which branch I want
David Megginson writes:
Norman Vine writes:
Not really -- the difference is that the actual values
(lat/lon/alt/hpr/airport/navaid/etc.) live in the main property tree,
and these tell us only where we should look for them.
Sounds to me like what is needed is a way to do
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Hi All
In an effort to see what 3D models might be in the pipeline and to save
people working on the same model.
Maybe people could say what A/C they have under development(not in your
imagination though).
I am currently working on the 737-300(almost finished) plus
I'm building FG under Cygwin on XP home this morning. All is well, but
I did find that I needed to add a link directory (the linker couldn't
find libsgmath):
$ LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib ./configure
I installed Cygwin this morning and plib, SG, and FG are from CVS and
AFAIK I did nothing different
Erik Hofman writes:
Norman Vine wrote:
Erik Hofman writes:
Tests have shown
that in-lining code doesn't make a huge difference (actually the code
might become slower ...) but it decreased the executable tremendously.
IMO the jury is still out on this :-)
Compiling with
Hi,
I try to compile Metakit with MSVC7 and got some error's.
I have looked for service packs, but I only found Service pack 5 for
the earlier version. Is this right, or can I use the service pack for Visual
C++ 7 ??
Bodo
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
http://www.a-g-t.com
http://www.microchip.com
http://cockpit.varxec.de/
What about having these links added to the Relateds sites/projects
section on the FlightGear webpage ?
I'm always afraid I might lose an URL, and these look like promising
projects...
--
Jorge Van Hemelryck
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:29:48 +0200
Matevz Jekovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For modern military aircrafts, I would make the following hierarchy:
- Fighter (most of F-xx, Rafale, MiG-s, Sukhoi-s)
- Attack (A-10, Harrier, Tornado, Mirage 2000, my J-22, Su-25)
- Bomber (F-117, B-1, B-2, B-52,
I added some more hotspots to Davids c172p since he already had done all
the animation.
Also I tried making the throttle and mixture knobs into hotspots even
when they are moving
adding extra hotspots for them. Also you can click on the trim wheel to
trim now.
I added a directory for the
On Saturday 20 September 2003 17:45, Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:29:48 +0200
Matevz Jekovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For modern military aircrafts, I would make the following hierarchy:
- Fighter (most of F-xx, Rafale, MiG-s, Sukhoi-s)
- Attack (A-10, Harrier,
Bodo von Thadden wrote:
Hi,
I try to compile Metakit with MSVC7 and got some error's.
I have looked for service packs, but I only found Service pack 5 for
the earlier version. Is this right, or can I use the service pack for
Visual
C++ 7 ??
AFAIK, there is no service pack for VC 7. Don't
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Bodo von Thadden wrote:
Hi,
I try to compile Metakit with MSVC7 and got some error's.
I have looked for service packs, but I only found Service pack 5 for
the earlier version. Is this right, or can I use the service pack for
Visual
C++ 7 ??
AFAIK, there is
Norman Vine wrote:
Unless someone literally follows your advice and removes all the
inlined code that we currently have :-)
Now, that would be a waste of precious time :-)
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know this is slightly off topic, but what is the possibility of having
a one aircraft, one file type configuration. The idea is basically to
put all of the requisite files for a particular aircraft into some kind
of archive file, such as a tarball, and then drop the archives into one
On Saturday 20 September 2003 04:29 pm, JD Fenech wrote:
I know this is slightly off topic, but what is the possibility of having
a one aircraft, one file type configuration. The idea is basically to
put all of the requisite files for a particular aircraft into some kind
of archive file, such
JD Fenech writes:
I know this is slightly off topic, but what is the possibility of having
a one aircraft, one file type configuration. The idea is basically to
put all of the requisite files for a particular aircraft into some kind
of archive file, such as a tarball, and then drop the
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:35:02PM +0800, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Hi All
In an effort to see what 3D models might be in the pipeline and to save
people working on the same model.
Maybe people could say what A/C they have under development(not in your
imagination though).
Boeing 717-200
Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi All
In an effort to see what 3D models might be in the pipeline and to save
people working on the same model.
Maybe people could say what A/C they have under development(not in your
imagination though).
I am currently working on the
That's good. Maybe a more generic Historical category would be
useful?
Don't all of our aircraft fit into that category?
:-)
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
snip
Two areas of concern. There are about 40 variations on the c172 and
about 20 variations on the c310 with different incantations and
aliases and various conglomerations of yasim, jsbsim, 3d cockpits, 2d
cockpits, etc. etc. etc. This was kind of
We might also want to start thinking of an official organization
hierarchy such as:
Aircraft/
LightSingles/
JetFighters/
CommercialJets/
CommercialTurboProps/
Bombers/
WWI/
WWII/
SailPlanes/
Experimental/
Regards,
Curt.
Are there any plans for helicopters,
http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT9733962835.html
There _must_ be a better way to communicate with the remote model aircraft
than to use a web application server as the client software ...
... any ideas ? 8-)
29 matches
Mail list logo
