Any ideas on Bug 39443? a block over multi pages

2006-05-06 Thread Adam
Dear FOP-dev group. Firstly would just like to say that the current work being done on FOP is fantastic. I've been able to use it in all manor of places from help guides to dynamic content creation using Cocoon. :) Re: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39443 I've done some mor

Re: Namespaces for fop extensions

2006-05-06 Thread Simon Pepping
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 11:31:38PM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote: > I wonder if we should agree on some guidelines for the use of namespaces > (namespace prefixes) for extensions. I am thinking along the following > lines: > > The namespace "http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/extensions"; (common > p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39501] - Inkscape SVG figures with text not displayed in PDF

2006-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39501] New: - Inkscape SVG figures with text not displayed in PDF

2006-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Namespaces for fop extensions

2006-05-06 Thread Manuel Mall
I wonder if we should agree on some guidelines for the use of namespaces (namespace prefixes) for extensions. I am thinking along the following lines: The namespace "http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/extensions"; (common prefix "fox") is reserved for generic extensions to FOP supported across

Re: AFP Renderer

2006-05-06 Thread Manuel Mall
On Saturday 06 May 2006 21:20, Manuel Mall wrote: > On Friday 05 May 2006 00:46, KeithHarris wrote: > > Oopse, sorry - Fop wasn't complaining about the shared id there - > > it was b/c I'd got the same chunk in a different part of the fo > > file. Following the old docs just brings up warnings (WAR

Re: AFP Renderer

2006-05-06 Thread Manuel Mall
On Friday 05 May 2006 00:46, KeithHarris wrote: > Oopse, sorry - Fop wasn't complaining about the shared id there - it > was b/c I'd got the same chunk in a different part of the fo file. > Following the old docs just brings up warnings (WARNING: Unknown > formatting object > http://org.apache.fop/