Re: svn commit: r591583 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src: codegen/fonts/ java/org/apache/fop/fonts/ java/org/apache/fop/pdf/

2007-11-05 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Jeremias, Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/Typeface.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/Typeface.java?rev=591583r1=591582r2=591583view=diff

Re: svn commit: r591583 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src: codegen/fonts/ java/org/apache/fop/fonts/ java/org/apache/fop/pdf/

2007-11-05 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Statistical interest. Increasing a long shouldn't use many more CPU cycles than setting a boolean to true, right? Jeremias Maerki On 05.11.2007 11:32:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Jeremias, Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/Typeface.java URL:

Re: svn commit: r591583 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src: codegen/fonts/ java/org/apache/fop/fonts/ java/org/apache/fop/pdf/

2007-11-05 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Statistical interest. Increasing a long shouldn't use many more CPU cycles than setting a boolean to true, right? That’s not a problem of performance. When I see this I simply wonder why a long is used while a boolean would be sufficient. Statistical interest, why not,

Re: svn commit: r591583 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src: codegen/fonts/ java/org/apache/fop/fonts/ java/org/apache/fop/pdf/

2007-11-05 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 5, 2007, at 12:42, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: Statistical interest. Increasing a long shouldn't use many more CPU cycles than setting a boolean to true, right? That’s not a problem of performance. When I see this I simply wonder why a long is used while a