Hi,
Author: jeremias
Date: Fri Apr 3 07:44:09 2009
New Revision: 761554
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761554view=rev
Log:
Fixed a bug that left the PrintRenderer unconfigured even if a configuration
was specified for application/X-fop-print.
snip/
+/** {...@inheritdoc}
Your suggestion sounds sensible enough to me (without having found time
to take a look at the code), +1.
Adrian.
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
Author: jeremias
Date: Fri Apr 3 07:44:09 2009
New Revision: 761554
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761554view=rev
Log:
Fixed a bug that
Hi Vincent,
Removing getMimeType() on AbstractRenderer is ok although that could
break someone else's renderer (risk very slim). But I'd rather move the
getMimeType() implementation from PrintRenderer to PageableRenderer.
That alone doesn't solve Rey's problem but get one step closer. I'll do
Hi,
I've been asked to do an estimate on implementing rounded borders in FOP.
I've put the technical part of my investigation on the Wiki for those
who are interested. There are not plans as of yet, I'm just trying to
get a feel for the amount of work necessary. Thoughts welcome.
On 03.04.2009
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Removing getMimeType() on AbstractRenderer is ok although that could
break someone else's renderer (risk very slim). But I'd rather move the
getMimeType() implementation from PrintRenderer to PageableRenderer.
That alone doesn't solve Rey's
Hi Vincent,
well, the print renderer doesn't really have an official MIME type.
The result could be paper, PDF, PostScript or whatever. I've given it a
pseudo MIME type application/X-fop-print just so configuration works
for this renderer, too. So it really depends how you look at it.
But I've
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46960
Summary: Minor bug with fo:marker
Product: Fop
Version: 1.0dev
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P4
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46960
--- Comment #1 from Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com 2009-04-03
06:18:11 PST ---
Just noticed a mistake in the description the number 2 is missing from after
the word page when describing where the Continued text is expected
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
Summary: Deadlock in PropertyCache class
Product: Fop
Version: 0.95
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
--- Comment #1 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-04-03
11:53:01 PST ---
Thanks for the report. We will investigate this closer ASAP.
For now, the only immediate relief would be to switch to FOP Trunk, which
allows
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
--- Comment #2 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-04-03
12:20:07 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Just to be complete:
For now, the only immediate relief would be to switch to FOP Trunk, ...
The addition of the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486
Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23090|0 |1
12 matches
Mail list logo