Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Zeev Pekar wrote: > 2) is it possible to deny access to folders of the source tree to > certain users and grant access to the rest of the folders? (like in > gitolite) > > With Fossil (or git or hg or mtn or bzr) each user has their own complete copy of the reposit

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:52:04 +0200 Zeev Pekar wrote: [...] > > It would be impossible to implement within fossil's world view. > > Once i clone a repo i have the whole thing, which i can then > > manipulate (with admin-level rights) on my machine - you cannot > > stop me from checking out a given

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Zeev Pekar wrote: > ** > > Ok, maybe implement "partial clones"? > > If you have a partial clone, fossil could not guaranty semantic consistency, could not accurately follow timeline information, etc. Any file in subdir a/b/c could refer to another file in subtre

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Zeev Pekar
- Original message - > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Zeev Pekar wrote: > > > ** > > > > I do miss this feature... :( What is the best workaround for this > > today? > > > > To use a DVCS which supports this. i'm not personally aware of any. > gitolite supports ACL on paths if I'm n

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Zeev Pekar wrote: > ** > > I do miss this feature... :( What is the best workaround for this today? > To use a DVCS which supports this. i'm not personally aware of any. > To developers: do you think this is important enough for you to implement > it one day? >

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Zeev Pekar
> > 2) is it possible to deny access to folders of the source tree to > > certain users and grant access to the rest of the folders? (like in > > gitolite) > > There is no ACL on path names. I do miss this feature... :( What is the best workaround for this today? To developers: do you think this

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Alek Paunov
On 04.11.2011 11:45, Stephan Beal wrote: @Everyone else: please correct that if it's wrong. No need of correction, I use fossil this way too: cat /etc/systemd/system/fossil.service [Unit] Description=Fossil Repositories After=network.target [Service] Type=simple User=fossil Group=src ExecSta

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 11:31:26AM +0200, Zeev Pekar wrote: > 1) if I have 2 projects do I have to a) create 2 separate repositories > or do I b) put both source trees in one repository? if a), how do I run > fossil server to make both repositories accessible at the same time from > outside? Creat

Re: [fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Zeev Pekar wrote: > 1) if I have 2 projects do I have to a) create 2 separate repositories > or do I b) put both source trees in one repository? It's personal personal preference. i keep everything separate (which means have 50 little fossil repos) while some pr

[fossil-users] 2 questions

2011-11-04 Thread Zeev Pekar
Hi, I have 2 questions regarding fossil: 1) if I have 2 projects do I have to a) create 2 separate repositories or do I b) put both source trees in one repository? if a), how do I run fossil server to make both repositories accessible at the same time from outside? 2) is it possible to deny acce