Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 23:59:23 +0200:
> > Seems natural. Maybe a ``reverse order'' button when viewing the
> > diff would be useful though?
> >
>
> See the "Invert" button.
Well... ok then, I will! It's nice when something already exists. :-)
Thanks,
Andy
--
TAI64 time
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> Personally, I like the current behavior. I determine the order in which
>
agreed, but..
> Seems natural. Maybe a ``reverse order'' button when viewing the diff
> would be useful though?
>
See the "Invert" button.
--
- stephan
Thus said Baruch Burstein on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:59:08 +0300:
> The idea of just clicking on 2 revisions in the timeline to get a diff
> is very convenient, but I would like to suggest a small improvement:
> No matter what order I click the boxes in, it should display the diff
> from the older
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Baruch Burstein
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The idea of just clicking on 2 revisions in the timeline to get a diff is
> very convenient, but I would like to suggest a small improvement: No matter
> what order I click the boxes in, it should display the diff from the older
>
Hi,
The idea of just clicking on 2 revisions in the timeline to get a diff is
very convenient, but I would like to suggest a small improvement: No matter
what order I click the boxes in, it should display the diff from the older
to the newer. To me it just makes more sense, since that is what I th
5 matches
Mail list logo
