On 1 November 2010 20:28, Wikipedia Signpost
wrote:
>
> Single page view
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signpost/Single
Hey, is the Signpost also sent to the Announce mailing list? If not,
could it be?
It's always full of useful information, and I could imagine people who
would want
I see it that way too. It is sufficient that if such questions arise
and are published, then we report on them.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:11 AM, wrote:
> mill...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 08:54, wrote:
>> > Quite right, the articles in other subjects are polluted with irrel
On 2 November 2010 19:56, wrote:
>> Perhaps, but one can't claim moral rights:
>
> o where the work is a computer program
> o where ownership of a work originally vested in an author's employer
> o where the material is being used in newspapers or magazines
> o reference works such as enc
In a message dated 11/2/2010 12:59:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
pjacobi...@googlemail.com writes:
> The problem with LLC is, that on many of their amazon pages,.
> Wikipedia isn't mentioned at all. Example:
> http://www.amazon.de/Himmelsmechanik-Gravitation-Keplersche-Titius-Bode-Rei
> he-Ereign
The problem with LLC is, that on many of their amazon pages,.
Wikipedia isn't mentioned at all. Example:
http://www.amazon.de/Himmelsmechanik-Gravitation-Keplersche-Titius-Bode-Reihe-Ereignishorizont/dp/1159048118
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation
On 02/11/2010 04:59, geni wrote:
> On 2 November 2010 03:53, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
>> Дана Tuesday 02 November 2010 02:57:10 geni написа:
>>> 2010/11/1 KIZU Naoko:
I see, thanks Mike. Personally I'm not for this kind of attempt, I'd
rather agree with Ryan: if and only if they complies
The point is that you search for a book on Amazon, and find a book for 50
dollars that is just a conglomeration of articles that were put together by
a computer, not a human, and therefore have little value. It is just a big
rip off.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:32 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 2 Nov
On 2 November 2010 12:02, wrote:
> In a message dated 11/1/2010 11:50:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> cimonav...@gmail.com writes:
>> Another thing that might shut this stuff down, or atleast make people
>> more
>> savvy in judging what quality they are getting, would be if we finally got
>> some
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Ashar Voultoiz wrote:
> On 01/11/10 08:47, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
>> Are there statistics about users' preferences on Wikimedia sites?
>>
>> For example, a statistic that would say things like how many users use every
>> skin and how many users have "Show preview b
Let's have our readers vote.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:49 PM, wrote:
> In a message dated 11/1/2010 6:16:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> jay...@gmail.com writes:
>
>
> > The PLOS Medicine article is based on a dataset of 78 interventional
> > studies, 81 observational studies, and only 47 scienti
In a message dated 11/1/2010 11:50:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
cimonav...@gmail.com writes:
> Another thing that might shut this stuff down, or atleast make people
> more
> savvy in judging what quality they are getting, would be if we finally got
> some
> dead tree stuff out there with the W
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Fred Bauder
> wrote:
>> My thought was for the Foundation to approach Amazon regarding carrying
>> listings of such books which seriously represent their content. as this
>> one does. Such a book approaches fraud.
>>
>
> Agreed. There is no *obligation* for Amazo
12 matches
Mail list logo
