Hi Alec,
On 19 August 2010 09:52, Alec Mitchell wrote:
> Though I voted against the inclusion of the UUID PLIP on it's own, if
> the link-by-uuid PLIP makes good use of it, then it certainly could be
> worth including.
I'd like to work with David to make sure that happens. It seems like
an obvi
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> On 19 August 2010 09:20, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> On 19 August 2010 06:47, Geir Bækholt wrote:
>>> On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> • 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
>>>
I think my reason for wanting it in the core, is t
On 19 August 2010 09:20, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> On 19 August 2010 06:47, Geir Bækholt wrote:
>> On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote:
• 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
>>
>>> I think my reason for wanting it in the core, is twofold:
>>>
>>> - There's a proliferation of half-solutions
On 19 August 2010 06:47, Geir Bækholt wrote:
> On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>> • 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
>
>> I think my reason for wanting it in the core, is twofold:
>>
>> - There's a proliferation of half-solutions to this problem right
>> now. We need something blessed
On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> • 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
> I think my reason for wanting it in the core, is twofold:
>
> - There's a proliferation of half-solutions to this problem right
> now. We need something blessed that people feel safe relying on. There
> is a cost a
Hello,
>>> • 10888 (Make KSS optional)
>>> • Quick consensus
>>> • Selenium testing
>>> • KSS does this. Plone doesn't. Do we require plip
>>> to add this for rewritten work?
>>
>>
>> Short: This plip is a chance for the FWT to give a strong push in the
>> right
On 8/18/10 7:35 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> Le 18/08/10 07:39, Eric Steele a écrit :
>
>
>> • 10888 (Make KSS optional)
>> • Quick consensus
>> • Selenium testing
>> • KSS does this. Plone doesn't. Do we require plip to
>> add this for rew
Le 18/08/10 07:39, Eric Steele a écrit :
> • 10888 (Make KSS optional)
> • Quick consensus
> • Selenium testing
> • KSS does this. Plone doesn't. Do we require plip to
> add this for rewritten work?
Short: This plip is a chance for the FWT
In the 4.0 cycle, PLIP branches were merged in one 'big bang' after
our implementation review. It was a painful process last time, with 30
PLIPs I don't think it will realistically work this time.
Instead of a single deadline, I propose that we ask PLIP implementors
to submit their PLIP for implem
