Unable to installworld after successful buildworld and buildkernel

>From $SRCDIR/UPDATING To cross-install current onto a separate partition -- # In this approach we use a separate partition to hold # current's root, 'usr', and 'var' directories. A partition # holding "/", "/usr" a

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 2013-10-08 01:11, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > >> On 2013-10-07 15:59, Allan Jude wrote: >>> Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to >>> implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k >>> sector gnop

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:45:23PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > > > On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > > > > > Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your > systems, without any of your own code or

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2013-10-07 15:59, Allan Jude wrote: >> Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to >> implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k >> sector gnop trick, and optional GELI encryption. We would l

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 2013-10-07 15:59, Allan Jude wrote: > Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to > implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k > sector gnop trick, and optional GELI encryption. We would like to commit > this in time for 10.0-BETA1 so it need

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/8/13 12:34 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: >>> >>>

Re: rcs

On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: Maybe there was no development for 15 years. However, the 7364 lines in ChangeLog after 2010-02-04 suggests that there may be few bugs to worry about. I think the fact is that most direct users of RC

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/8/13 12:34 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer > wrote: On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: >> >>> On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >>> Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800:

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/8/13 10:03 AM, Steve Rikli wrote: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:32:21PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 10/7/13 6:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: ... PS: As noted, the code is GPL. There has been an effort to remove GPL code from FreeBSD (whether prudent or not). That plus the age of the code

Re: rcs

On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > Maybe there was no development for 15 years. However, the 7364 > lines in ChangeLog after 2010-02-04 suggests that there may > be few bugs to worry about. Dear Troll, Demonstrate one. ___ freebsd-cu

Re: rcs

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:31:01PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base? > > The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and make their > technical case. > I don't care if rcs stays or goes, but ... There is a 15 year

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

On (07/10/2013 21:59), Outback Dingo wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > > > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over? What > > > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed b

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:32:21PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 10/7/13 6:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > >... > >PS: As noted, the code is GPL. There has been an effort > >to remove GPL code from FreeBSD (whether prudent or not). > > That plus the age of the code is good enough reason to ditch

rcs

Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base? The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and make their technical case. --lyndon ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: rcs is gone?

Glen Barber wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 20:59 -0400: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > No, not really. > > > > > > # mkdir local > > > # svnadmin create ./local > > > # svn import /etc file:///$PWD/local > > > > besides the s/svn/

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over? What > > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed before 10.1 or will we have > > to live w/ the code? > >

Re: Changes to UART ns8250

Zbigniew, On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Zbigniew Bodek wrote: > Hello. > > I would like to present a patch for ns8250 serial that I would like to > commit in the near future (if there are no objections). > > The patch is fixing newest DesignWare UART with busy detection. > During frequency di

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 8 October 2013 02:49, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > [snip] > > Less GPL code in FreeBSD? >> > not a problem unless you plan in shipping a changed version of it on your > product?? ... and there's already a WITHOUT_RCS switch if the GPLed RCS is *really

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over? What > > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed before 10.1 or will we have > > to live w/ the code? > >

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 6:05 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > I don't see any discussion as to why the code (CVS, in this case) *needs* to > be removed. My stupidity: I meant RCS, not CVS. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc becasu

Re: rcs is gone?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/07/13 18:37, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More > wrote: > >> >> I would like to see RCS remain in base as well. Many enterprise >> distro still ship it by default too. There is no compelling >> reason

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over? What > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed before 10.1 or will we have > to live w/ the code? I still hope not to get hit by bus any time soon..

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > > I would like to see RCS remain in base as well. Many enterprise distro > still ship it by default too. There is no compelling reason to remove it. > I sort of retract that statement. I thought the base RCS was already OpenRCS. I suppo

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: > On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: > >> not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc > >> becasue it is "just there" > > > >

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/7/13 6:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01:34AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: Hey all, RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to use RCS

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/8/13 9:05 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > >> On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: >> >> I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion >>> involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memor

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01:34AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> Hey all, > >> > >> RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to > >> use RCS please install eith

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 17:41 -0700: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 16:47 -0700: > >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > >> > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this messa

Re: rcs is gone?

On 10/8/13 9:05 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that it showed up in some of the messages there. I don't see any dis

Re: rcs is gone?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/07/13 17:42, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why n

Re: rcs is gone?

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 02:03:44AM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > On 8 October 2013 01:59, Glen Barber wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > Plus, I was quite reasured that svn isn't smart enough to realize that > > > a path mi

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion > involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that it > showed up in some of the messages there. I don't see any discussion as to why the code (CVS, in this

Re: rcs is gone?

On 8 October 2013 01:59, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > [snip] > > Plus, I was quite reasured that svn isn't smart enough to realize that > > a path might be a file: url relative to the current working directory... > > I don't know what

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2013-10-07 20:21, Teske, Devin wrote: >> On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Warren Block wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: >>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: > >> Ad

Re: rcs is gone?

On 8 October 2013 01:58, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:49 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if > > it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in. > > > > > > -a > > It was mentioned briefly on stable@ > > http:

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > No, not really. > > > > # mkdir local > > # svnadmin create ./local > > # svn import /etc file:///$PWD/local > > besides the s/svn/svnlite/ you forgot... It doesn't work... Sure it WITH_SVN in src.conf will insta

Re: rcs is gone?

On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your > > > systems, without any of your own code or any customisation? > > We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs. > > > > We are physically air-gapped from the inte

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:49 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if > it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in. > > > -a It was mentioned briefly on stable@ http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-August/0692

Re: rcs is gone?

Glen Barber wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 20:42 -0400: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > > So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD > > > > decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just > > > > d

Re: Buying recommendation for silent router/fileserver

Finally got around to it, kern/182818. Thanks for the encouragement. On 10/12/12 11:14, Adam McDougall wrote: I did not, but I put it on my list to try to accomplish. On 10/11/12 13:41, Adrian Chadd wrote: Did you ever file a PR for the slow SATA behaviour? Adrian On 11 October 2012 09:52

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 5:40 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: >> svnlite? >> > fail I won't go that far, immediately. But I need a tool that lets me migrate the history of my RCS files to the new regime. And the new tools(s) *must* be part of the base system. (Migration tools included.) And the new

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD > > > decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute > > > a kernel and a few bits that are barely sufficient for the initial

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc becasue it is "just there" +1 Folks, this is just plain a major violation of the Principle of Least Amazemen

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 16:47 -0700: >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >> > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:31 -0700: >> >> Patch is available here: >> >>

Re: rcs is gone?

On 10/8/13 5:29 AM, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote: Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port. So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD decide t

Re: rcs is gone?

Glen Barber wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 17:29 -0400: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > > On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > > > > > > Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port. > > > > > > > So there's no version c

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 2013-10-07 20:21, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: >> >>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: > Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall: >

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: > not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc > becasue it is "just there" +1 -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 16:47 -0700: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:31 -0700: > >> Patch is available here: > >> https://github.com/glk/freebsd-head/commit/b4d2c4a5f42f88fdd07c

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: > >> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: >>> Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall: 1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyb

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall: 1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyboard mapping' prompt to no Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/quer

Re: rcs is gone?

On 8 October 2013 01:00, Adrian Chadd wrote: [snip] Oh, I know it's an up-hill battle. But I honestly thought that this had > been communicated on a list somewhere. It seems.. not. I don't know why. > Gah. It's been communicated at Sun, 6 Oct 2013 22:43:21 -0400, but that doesn't meed there's

Re: rcs is gone?

On 10/8/13 6:45 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote: Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your systems, without any of your own code or any customisation? We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs. We are phy

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: Hey all, RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be sure to check out the alternatives (pun stolen

Re: rcs is gone?

On 7 October 2013 16:58, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > On 2013-10-07, at 4:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. > > Adrian, something to keep in mind is that the majority of your code's > users will never use your preferred communication me

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 4:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. Adrian, something to keep in mind is that the majority of your code's users will never use your preferred communication media. So when you propose to remove a feature, absence of pu

Re: rcs is gone?

I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in. -a On 7 October 2013 16:46, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/8/13 7:37 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback lik

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:31 -0700: >> Patch is available here: >> https://github.com/glk/freebsd-head/commit/b4d2c4a5f42f88fdd07cb75feba3467e4d4c043c.patch > > Is there a reason you are writing your own AES

Re: rcs is gone?

On 10/8/13 7:37 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi! Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far earlier in the development process. Adiran this is the first I've heard of removing RCS. I would have screamed about it had I heard anything.. so now that I officially regi

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 4:37 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far > earlier in the development process. So when was this first discussed? I've been on -current for over a decade. If I missed a prior discussion I truly apologize. --

Re: rcs is gone?

Hi! Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far earlier in the development process. If everyone who communicates says "x" and no-one says anything about the other letters "a"->"w", "y", "z", then we as developers don't really have a good cross-section of what peopl

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:31 -0700: > Patch is available here: > https://github.com/glk/freebsd-head/commit/b4d2c4a5f42f88fdd07cb75feba3467e4d4c043c.patch Is there a reason you are writing your own AES-NI implementation instead of using the OpenCrypto framework? I

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 3:45 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > Having RCS in the base system is very useful. We use it to track changes to > bits of /etc on the machines where we don't do wholesale customizations. > (Those ones get git, but they also get an install of /usr/ports with a fully > popula

Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi Gleb & All > > Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I would like to ask everybody's opinion regarding committing PEFS to > >> CURRENT. > >> > >> PEFS is a stacked cryptographic file system for FreeBSD. Devel

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:45:23PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > > > Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your > > systems, without any of your own code or any customisation? > > We install from the base release

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your systems, > without any of your own code or any customisation? We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs. We are physically air-gapped from the internet, none

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2013-10-07 18:40:22 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-07 18:40:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 2013-10-07 18:25, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Teske, Devin >> wrote: >> >> On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Allan Jude wrote: >> >>> On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, A

Re: CURRENT BUILD FAILURE sys/modules/cxgbe

On Oct 7, 2013, at 23:04, Outback Dingo wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:52 -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: >>> cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE >> -nostdinc >>> -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe/../../../de

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Teske, Devin > wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > > > On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > >> > >>> On 2013-10-07

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to > use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be > sure to check out the alternatives (pun stolen and intended). Thanks for removing this piece

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Teske, Devin wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > > > On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude > wrote: > >> > >>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > On 7 October 2013 22:28, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > svnlite? :) > > > > Thanks Lev & Glen- it's something to explore albeit that screws up quite a > lot of stuff on this end... > Why does that screw up anything? Just include the RCS pack

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > Hey all, > > RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to > use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be > sure to check out the alternatives (pun stolen and intended). > > rc.subr use rcs in bac

Re: rcs is gone?

.. don't be surprised how many people do exactly this; then compile what handful of things they need from source in order to make a server. -adrian On 7 October 2013 14:53, David Chisnall wrote: > On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:14, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > > "Install from ports" is a non-starter.

Re: rcs is gone?

On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:14, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > "Install from ports" is a non-starter. Our development systems will never be > connected to the internet for a ports upgrade. In this environment, in-base > RCS is a very useful tool. Why is install from packages any harder than installing t

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude wrote: >> >>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: > Additional, it includes some other changes to bsd

Re: rcs is gone?

On 7 October 2013 22:28, Lev Serebryakov wrote: svnlite? :) > Thanks Lev & Glen- it's something to explore albeit that screws up quite a lot of stuff on this end... Cheers, -- Igor M. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > >> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: >>> Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall: 1. Change the default to the 'non-standard k

Kernel build fail for generic on r256122 (if_cxgbe)

Details on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=dNzL3yXR ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: rcs is gone?

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > > > Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port. > > > > So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD > decide to move away from distrib

Re: rcs is gone?

Hello, Igor. You wrote 8 октября 2013 г., 1:26:07: >> Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port. IM> So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD IM> decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute IM> a kernel and a few bits tha

Re: rcs is gone?

On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port. > So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute a kernel and a few bits that are barel

Re: rcs is gone?

On 10/7/13 2:14 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: On 2013-10-07, at 2:08 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: And sorry, what I left out was how having ci/co in the base is immensely helpful with the installer scripts I write. The server installation scripts I've cooked up use ci(1) to keep a record of ch

Re: Changes to UART ns8250

Hello Ian. Well you can't really perform wake event basing on busy interrupt because we are busy waiting/sleeping i.a. to avoid that interrupt to occur. I tried to use pause() that should switch to another task for the declared amount of time and I got: "panic: mi_switch: switch in a critical sect

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 2:08 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > And sorry, what I left out was how having ci/co in the base is immensely > helpful with the installer scripts I write. The server installation scripts > I've cooked up use ci(1) to keep a record of changes made during the > (possibly custo

Re: rcs is gone?

On 7 October 2013 22:08, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > On 2013-10-07, at 2:02 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > > I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files > on individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf, > sysctl.conf, a simple 'ci -l xxx' is a tri

Re: ZFS L2ARC - incorrect size and abnormal system load on r255173

One more question - we have two counter - kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_size: 1256609410560 kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_asize: 1149007667712 can anybody explain how to understand them i.e. l2_asize - real used space on l2arc an l2_size - uncompressed size, or maybe something else ? Vitalij

Re: rcs is gone?

On 2013-10-07, at 2:02 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files on > individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf, sysctl.conf, > a simple 'ci -l xxx' is a trivial way to maintain local revision control. And sorry

Re: CURRENT BUILD FAILURE sys/modules/cxgbe

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:52 -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: > > cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE > -nostdinc > > -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe/../../../dev/cxgbe > > -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > >

rcs is gone?

I know I am a certified crank, but ... why? This is some of the simplest code on the planet. Is it broken by recent OS releases? I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files on individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf, sysctl.conf, a simple 'c

Re: Changes to UART ns8250

On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 14:56 -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 22:36 +0200, Zbigniew Bodek wrote: > > Hello Adrian, > > > > Thank you for your remarks. > > Please check my answers in-line. > > > > Best regards > > Zbigniew Bodek > > > > > > 2013/10/7 Adrian Chadd > > > > > Hi, >

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: > > > >> Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall: > >> 1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyboard mapping' prompt > >> to no > > > > Ple

Re: CURRENT BUILD FAILURE sys/modules/cxgbe

On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:52 -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: > cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc > -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe/../../../dev/cxgbe > -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/a

Re: Changes to UART ns8250

On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 22:36 +0200, Zbigniew Bodek wrote: > Hello Adrian, > > Thank you for your remarks. > Please check my answers in-line. > > Best regards > Zbigniew Bodek > > > 2013/10/7 Adrian Chadd > > > Hi, > > > > You should add: > > > > * a loop counter, to break out after a while; >

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: > >> Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall: >> 1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyboard mapping' prompt >> to no > > Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/162175 . > __

CURRENT BUILD FAILURE sys/modules/cxgbe

cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe/../../../dev/cxgbe -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -fno-common -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote: Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall: 1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyboard mapping' prompt to no Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/162175 . ___ freebsd-c

  1   2   >