Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-06-24 12:56 +, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:33:05AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > I submitted some patches to use sendfile(2) that weren't accepted > > for some reason. It's not too hard, you just have to adjust the code > > not to close(2) the descriptors an

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:33:05AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I submitted some patches to use sendfile(2) that weren't accepted > for some reason. It's not too hard, you just have to adjust the code > not to close(2) the descriptors and make the mmap() function a stub > type thing. > > rea

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020624 10:24] wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > Cool, thttpd / others should benefit greatly then. > > > > The last time I checked thttpd didn't even use sendfile(2). It does > > use accf_http(9). Mayb

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > Cool, thttpd / others should benefit greatly then. > > The last time I checked thttpd didn't even use sendfile(2). It does > use accf_http(9). Maybe kqueue(2) could speed it up further. > > -- > Andre I thought that thttpd

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Andre Oppermann
Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:17:03 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > > > > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > > > > MDT. If t

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:17:03 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > > > MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than wi

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Kenneth D. Merry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > MDT. Great! DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:17:03 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > > MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than willing to delay it. > > Out of curiousity, what happens

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-23 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than willing to delay it. Out of curiousity, what happens when the page being write()n is a mmap'd page shared by multiple processe