Sorry, diff/patch and me got into an argument it seems.
Should be fixed now.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kent Hauser writes:
I can't build a kernel after CVSUP'ing today.
After successfully completing a `make world', I tried
to build a kernel. Edited script below.
chapel-hill# cd
It seems Alexander Langer wrote:
2320:
* * * W A R N I N G * * *
The ata driver has some issues with the Apollo MVP3 chipset.
Drives work only in pio mode and must be set to pio mode early
int the boot process. Do not upgrade. If you must upgrade
For an opinion from a reasonably new-comer and non-developer, I think at
least the main source tree should remain *completely* complete.
As someone mentioned, why not have "lite" mirrors?
Dan K.
gh
| On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
|
| On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, you wrote:
|
| I
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:15:47AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 29 April 2000 at 13:44:08 -0700, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
jlemon 2000/04/29 13:44:08 PDT
Added files:
lib/libstand
Because I can't do anything more intelligent to find my 2-printer-panic,
I'd like at least to know when it broke.
It works in a kernel from march 15, and has been broken at least a week.
So I cvsup to 2000.04.01.00.00.00 to see if it worked then.
Is it enough to compile a new kernel, or do I
In a freshly cvsup'ed current, I get a panic at boot, if both ports are
enabled in userconfig.
If only one or the other is enabled, it works.
I have narrowed it down to it panics the second time ppbconf calls
bus_generic_probe:
trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
bus_generic_probe+0x25:
-On [2430 15:05], Kent Hauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks. I can now build the GENERIC kernel.
Of course, now my real kernel won't link :=
chapel-hill# make
linking kernel
ng_base.o: In function `ng_make_node':
ng_base.o(.text+0x54): undefined reference to `linker_search_path
Here's a simple patch which works for me.
--- /sys/netgraph/ng_base.c Sun Apr 30 11:32:22 2000
+++ /sys/netgraph/ng_base.c_mod Sun Apr 30 11:40:24 2000
@@ -314,11 +314,16 @@
int error;
/* Not found, try to load it as a loadable module */
+#if 0
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Here's a simple patch which works for me.
This patch is not 100% correct. ng_base should make an attempt to
load module, not KLD. There was a new module_load() function proposed to
inclusion in the API, but for some reason it is not committed
-On [2430 16:50], Boris Popov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This patch is not 100% correct. ng_base should make an attempt to
load module, not KLD. There was a new module_load() function proposed to
inclusion in the API, but for some reason it is not committed yet.
When Peter committed
-On [2430 11:50], Leif Neland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
In a freshly cvsup'ed current, I get a panic at boot, if both ports are
enabled in userconfig.
If only one or the other is enabled, it works.
I have narrowed it down to it panics the second time ppbconf calls
bus_generic_probe:
trap
-On [2429 19:20], Salvo Bartolotta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I issued a "ldconfig -r | grep ld-linux" and, actually, I found
[snip]
What prevents ldconfig -m /usr/compat/linux/lib from doing its duty ?
What am I missing ?
I might be wrong, but the native ldconfig has nothing to do with
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
-On [2430 16:50], Boris Popov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This patch is not 100% correct. ng_base should make an attempt to
load module, not KLD. There was a new module_load() function proposed to
inclusion in the API
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, gh wrote:
For an opinion from a reasonably new-comer and non-developer, I think at
least the main source tree should remain *completely* complete.
As someone mentioned, why not have "lite" mirrors?
Oh, for god's sake, PLEASE let this drop! I don't want to insult a
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:29:43AM +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
Because I can't do anything more intelligent to find my 2-printer-panic,
I'd like at least to know when it broke.
It works in a kernel from march 15, and has been broken at least a week.
So I cvsup to 2000.04.01.00.00.00 to see
On Sat 2000-04-29 (20:56), gh wrote:
For an opinion from a reasonably new-comer and non-developer, I think at
least the main source tree should remain *completely* complete.
As someone mentioned, why not have "lite" mirrors?
You are welcome to co-ordinate the resources (developer time,
Hi again,
I'm still having trouble getting sound out of my SBLive
card. I'm running -CURRENT as of 4/28.
My box performs a "reset" (not a panic) whenever I try
to play a mp3 file or a real-audio clip. The box makes
no noise (but at least doesn't reset) when I try "cdcontrol play"
I've tried
VINSON WAYNE HOWARD wrote:
Ok, I checked, and vmstat shows cpu usage to be quite normal, about 6%
while playing. What's up w/ top?
Xmms on my SMP current machine: top shows 40 to 43% system
vmstat shows 10 to 11%
--
Ted Sikora
Jtl Development Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe:
Ted Sikora wrote:
VINSON WAYNE HOWARD wrote:
Ok, I checked, and vmstat shows cpu usage to be quite normal, about 6%
while playing. What's up w/ top?
Xmms on my SMP current machine: top shows 40 to 43% system
vmstat shows 10 to 11%
vmstat -w 1 matches top exactly about 41-43%
I guess it depends on your soundcard, I'm getting the behavior I'm getting
with a ViBRA 16X and a kernel as of this morning. This didn't start
happening until about 4 days ago with a -CURRENT kernel. Maybe you have an
older -CURRENT.
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
I guess it depends on your soundcard, I'm getting the behavior I'm getting
with a ViBRA 16X and a kernel as of this morning. This didn't start
happening until about 4 days ago with a -CURRENT kernel. Maybe you have an
older -CURRENT.
I did a make
Ok, I have some *gasp* actual usefull info about this. Backing
/src/sys/dev/sound up by 10 days via anoncvs makes the "feature" go away.
That narrows it down to kernel issues. I'm in the process of narowing it
down to the specific diff, but if I had to cast a bet, i'd go for the
massive
Hmm, I don't know then, I'm using that ViBRA 16X which seems to cause
problems a lot.
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
Hmm, I don't know then, I'm using that ViBRA 16X which seems to cause
problems a lot.
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Ted Sikora wrote:
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
I guess it depends on your soundcard, I'm getting the behavior I'm getting
with a ViBRA 16X
24 matches
Mail list logo