On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 22:13 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:08 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> : > M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : > >
Just got reminded of this...
I noticed some kernel builds use -fomit-frame-pointer by default,
even if you do a debug kernel. That kinda defeats the purpose
since gdb uses the frame pointer when examining the stack, like,
when doing backtraces, i.e. you lose function calls in backtraces
when the
Hi,
I have Nokia Card Phone 2.0 (on a supported HW list) in a PCMCIA to PCI
adapter. I have used this combination some time ago (2-3 years) and it worked
without any problems. I don't remember what FreeBSD version I used that time.
I tried to get it working under FreeBSD 6.2R today but was not
su
On 16/08/2007, at 8:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert McKenzie wrote:
Has anyone noted that the Australian cvs repository seems to be so
hopelessly out of sink that you cannot do a clean build using a clean
cvsup.
Because we are so far away it is hard to keep things sinkronized.
We re
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Robert McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Has anyone noted that the Australian cvs repository seems to be so
> > > hopelessly out of sink that you cannot do a clean build using a
> > > clean cvsup.
> > Because we are
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:49:21AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Robert McKenzie wrote:
> > Has anyone noted that the Australian cvs repository seems to be so
> > hopelessly out of sink that you cannot do a clean build using a clean
> > cvsup.
>
> Because we are so far away it is hard to keep
Robert McKenzie wrote:
> Has anyone noted that the Australian cvs repository seems to be so
> hopelessly out of sink that you cannot do a clean build using a clean
> cvsup.
Because we are so far away it is hard to keep things sinkronized.
--
tonym
___
Eric Anderson wrote:
What is the easiest way to play with modifying data in-transit within
an ethernet bridge?
For instance, say I have something like this:
[BOX 1] <> [ BOX 2 ] <> [ BOX 3 ]
And BOX 2 is a FreeBSD box with bridging enabled between two ethernet
interfaces, how can I p
Eric Anderson wrote:
What is the easiest way to play with modifying data in-transit within an
ethernet bridge?
For instance, say I have something like this:
[BOX 1] <> [ BOX 2 ] <> [ BOX 3 ]
And BOX 2 is a FreeBSD box with bridging enabled between two ethernet
interfaces, how can I p
9 matches
Mail list logo