Hello,
For the Intel processors VT support, you can check up on
http://ark.intel.com/VTList.aspx
go for no less than dual-core 8400.
and for the AMD desktop processors, here:
http://products.amd.com/en-us/DesktopCPUResult.aspx
and some of new X4 phenoms.
Either AMD or Intel, both are good
8MB/s.
Is this possible bug in mount_smbfs or just the simple misconfiguration?
I have configured the /etc/nsmb.conf file as per manual and it really
gets connected nicely but afterwards it presents me with catastrophic
results.
With respect
Nenad Mihajlovic
Hi all,
Recently I have received the reuest from the colleague to create the
homebrewn NAS for his small office, so I started checking the possible
options, and having good, stable and long relationship with FreeBSD
I've settled again for it.
Machine is not something special, Pentium D with
Hi all,
Recently I have received the reuest from the colleague to create the
homebrewn NAS for his small office, so I started checking the possible
options, and having good, long and stable relationship with FreeBSD
I've settled again for it.
Machine is not something special, Pentium D with
Hi all,
Recently I have received the reuest from the colleague to create the
homebrewn NAS for his small office, so I started checking the possible
options, and having good, long and stable relationship with FreeBSD
I've settled again for it.
Machine is not something special, Pentium D with
I found it.
I'll try it out, and see what we get.
Interesting thing is, that i went again to verify the finds that i
wrote in my letter, and it is not the ping itself that increases
performance, but the fact of multiple connections - while pinging from
console (ping -f), the behaviour stays