On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:09:50PM -0700, Barkley Vowk wrote:
> No. The installer showed only one slice da0s1d, and the whole disk was
> assigned to it.
>
> I'd check on the running box but:
> koth# disklabel -e /dev/da0
> disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported
Exactly
Am Dienstag, den 08.11.2005, 23:41 -0500 schrieb Mike Jakubik:
> Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Monday 07 November 2005 09:23 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
[...]
> > I don't know. ENOTIME, maybe? CC'ing anholt.
> >
> >
>
> I emailed him in private, he is simply too busy. I have tried it with
> 6-STABLE
On 2005-11-09 20:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I don't know if this is a bug somewhere in the source but my
> system will not boot after I buildworld FreeBSD 6.0. I get the
> error:
>
> Can't work out which disk to boot from
>
> This error occurs right after the loader is booted and b
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:00:09PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On 09 Nov Paul Keusemann wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:27:33PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote:
> > > See my posts and others on these topics:
> > > critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4)
> > > 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks
Hey all,
I don't know if this is a bug somewhere in the source but my system will not
boot after I buildworld FreeBSD 6.0. I get the error:
Can't work out which disk to boot from
This error occurs right after the loader is booted and before the FreeBSD menu.
System of course stalls here and s
Hello,
I upgraded my amd64 installation to 6.0-RELEASE, and I am no longer
able to use X. It exits with a signal 11 error. I have recompiled from
ports, installed from packages from freebsd.org and performed a clean
installation from an i386 6.0-R cd again installing from both port
compilation
Hi!
>> Locale not supported by C library, locale unchanged
This is not a specific problem of gnome-terminal.
I receive this message also for xfce4, gqview, and etc.
Looks like problem appears after updating with 'make world' from 5.4 to 6.0 (in
my case).
I reinstalled some ports and problem di
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Colin Percival wrote:
>> I find this argument hard to accept. The vast majority of FreeBSD
>> users will never need the NFS_ROOT option, and many systems do not
>> even have the hardware for serial or parallel ports, yet those are
>> supported in the GENE
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:26AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
> Hi
>
> I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago
> (against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new.
>
> Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239,
> all the latest from ports.
> The p
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 14:41, Alistair wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> >On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote:
> >>This script is one of the most frustrating things ever
> >>written.
> >>
> >>[Snip]
> >
> >As an alternative to gnome-upgrade.sh you may want to consider
>
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:18:11 +0100, Michal 'max' Marciniak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ronald Klop wrote:
> 7. reboot into single-usermode and verify your new kernel works
How do you reboot into single-usermode from remote?
(Rebooting isn't really the problem, working in
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote:
This script is one of the most frustrating things ever
written.
[Snip]
As an alternative to gnome-upgrade.sh you may want to consider
using sysutils/portmanager, all you need do is run
portmanager x11/gnome
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ronald Klop wrote:
>> > 7. reboot into single-usermode and verify your new kernel works
>>
> How do you reboot into single-usermode from remote?
> (Rebooting isn't really the problem, working in single-usermode is.)
>
>
/etc/ttys
# If console is marked "insecure", then init w
On 09 Nov Paul Keusemann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:27:33PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote:
> > See my posts and others on these topics:
> > critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4)
> > 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2)
> > [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing
>
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote:
> This script is one of the most frustrating things ever
> written.
>
> I made a fresh install (from CD) of 6.0R. In the install
> I added gnome2, sudo, and bash. That's it. Gnome came up fine.
> bash is great, sudo works.
>
> Now, since gnom
This script is one of the most frustrating things ever
written.
I made a fresh install (from CD) of 6.0R. In the install
I added gnome2, sudo, and bash. That's it. Gnome came up fine.
bash is great, sudo works.
Now, since gnome 2.12 is out, I want to upgrade to that.
Seems resonable.
http://www
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:35:59 +0100, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
short additional step:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
The easiest would be to
1. cvsup to RELENG_6 (or RELENG_6_0)
1.1 cd /usr/obj; chflags noschg *; rm -rf *
2. cd /usr/src
3. make buildworld
4. make buildkern
Hello!
After updating from 5.4 to 6.0 - which went absolutely painless,
BTW - I'm having a little difficulty getting my gre tunnel to the
office intranet to work.
This is the only thread I found via google, that possibly matches
my problem. Unfortunately I cannot read Russian.
http://groups.goog
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:27:33PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote:
> See my posts and others on these topics:
> critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4)
> 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2)
> [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing
Thanks for the pointers. I have not been
No. The installer showed only one slice da0s1d, and the whole disk was
assigned to it.
I'd check on the running box but:
koth# disklabel -e /dev/da0
disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported
/dev only shows:
koth# ls /dev/da0*
/dev/da0/dev/da0s1 /dev/da0s1c
Hi all,
I've found finally the solution on
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-mobile/2005-May/006369.html.
And there is a patched kernel for Compaq R3000 available to download.
Now FreeBSD 5.4 is installed on my Compaq, great !
Many thanks to george+freebsd at m5p.com*, *the author
I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64.
Under 5.4-R I could have >1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not
having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too.
However, 6.0-R gives me a tragic:
/dev/da0s1d723G 54G611G 8%/home
Certainly not what I wa
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 10:13, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Try using TSC or i8254:
> sysctl kern.MUMBLE.timecounter=TSC
>
> (developers@ removed from cc:)
Also, consider setting
host.useFastclock = "FALSE"
in your server's .vmx file.
This makes all the difference for a Linux guest OS, al
Am 09.11.2005 um 04:55 schrieb Brian Buchanan:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Petr Holub wrote:
I've found the following problem on my IBM T41p when running 6.0-
RELEASE:
when both psm and acpi_ibm are compiled in the kernel, the psm0
device
(touchpad) doesn't initialize properly - with verbose loggi
While we're nit-picking ... ;-)
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> short additional step:
>
> Claus Guttesen wrote:
> >
> > The easiest would be to
> >
> > 1. cvsup to RELENG_6 (or RELENG_6_0)
> 1.1 cd /usr/obj; chflags noschg *; rm -rf *
> > 2. cd /usr/src
> > 3. make build
Hi,
Using a RELENG_6_0 from this morning, I got the panic message :
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc061de49
stack pointer = 0x28:0xcad86afc
frame p
Hi there,
short additional step:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
The easiest would be to
1. cvsup to RELENG_6 (or RELENG_6_0)
1.1 cd /usr/obj; chflags noschg *; rm -rf *
2. cd /usr/src
3. make buildworld
4. make buildkernel
5. make installkernel
6. mergemaster -p
7. reboot into single-usermode and ve
this one is eating my breakfast (too early for lunch here:-)
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
TB --- 2005-11-09 14:06:05 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-11-09 14:06:05 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2005-11-09 14:06:06 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 14:07:03 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 14:07:03 - cd
Hello,
i just tried to install FreeBSD-6.0 on a HP DL320 box. It seems that
FreeBSD cant mount the S-ATA Harddrives attached to the onboard Intel ICH6
UDMA100 controller any more, with FreeBSD-5.4 it works.
Following the dmesg output (boot -v):
---
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Miguel wrote this message on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 14:09 -0600:
I dont understand exactly why do you have to recompile, unless a new
future is needed, like SMP, isnt it?, what harm is doing those extra megs?
In the general case, no, you do not need to recompile..
Oliver Fromme wrote:
***
This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to be free
of known security risks.
***-***
Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole
> mach
I did this on a Sun Ultra5 system last night.
I forgot (as I usually do) mergemaster -p. But
everything worked fine. The -p usually just
catches missing users and such that could cause
install problems.
Claus Guttesen wrote:
***
This message has been scanned by the InterScan
> usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole
> machine and re--install from scratch. But I understand that the move
> to 6.0 from 5.4 is nowhere near such a big leap.
>
> So I was wondering hether I could just do this from source without any
> ill effects, as if I was upgr
Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole
> machine and re--install from scratch. But I understand that the move
> to 6.0 from 5.4 is nowhere near such a big leap.
>
> So I was wondering hether I could just do this from sourc
On Mer 9 novembre 2005 08:47, Mikkel Skærris wrote:
> Hello!
hello,
> I have a IBM laptop T40 with a builtin wireless adapter (Intel 2100BG).
> For
> some time now I have been using the ipw driver, but I find i rather
> unstable
> and it makes my system freeze quite often. So I have installed nd
On 09/11/05, Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole
> machine and re--install from scratch. But I understand that the move
> to 6.0 from 5.4 is nowhere near such a big leap.
>
> So I was wondering hether I could just do this fro
usually when I upgrade across major versions of BSD I wipe the whole
machine and re--install from scratch. But I understand that the move
to 6.0 from 5.4 is nowhere near such a big leap.
So I was wondering hether I could just do this from source without any
ill effects, as if I was upgrading 5.4->
It seems that it work. Thanks.
Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify "em", for "tun", vice
versa... what a mess, hehe.
Cuk
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:00:32AM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote:
Resend...
Please, does anyone have any ideas...
What is th
TB --- 2005-11-09 08:12:53 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-11-09 08:12:53 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2005-11-09 08:12:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 08:13:46 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 08:13:46 - cd
Hello!
I have a IBM laptop T40 with a builtin wireless adapter (Intel 2100BG). For
some time now I have been using the ipw driver, but I find i rather unstable
and it makes my system freeze quite often. So I have installed ndis as U
used to do it on 5.4, but i seems that it can't bind to a specifi
Hi
I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago
(against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new.
Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239,
all the latest from ports.
The problem I have is this: If i have LoadModule python_module
libexec/ap
Miguel wrote this message on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 14:09 -0600:
> John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> >GENERIC is already so large, that if you want/need a smaller kernel,
> >you're going to rebuild anyways,
> >
> >Since I care about that extra 2megs, I recompiled my own kernel,
> And the real problem of
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello freebsd-stable,
FreeBSD 6.0 on VMWare 5.0 prints such messages every 3-4 minute.
Also, messages like
calcru: runtime went backwards from 40644816 to 40005944 usec for pid 3 (g_up)
is shown routinely.
timecounter is ACPI-safe, kernel is GENERIC one.
5.4-
Lev Serebryakov wrote this message on Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:53 +0300:
> Hello freebsd-stable,
>
> FreeBSD 6.0 on VMWare 5.0 prints such messages every 3-4 minute.
> Also, messages like
>
> calcru: runtime went backwards from 40644816 to 40005944 usec for pid 3 (g_up)
>
> is shown routine
45 matches
Mail list logo
