2009/5/1 Eric Auer :
> Why did our old code do that complex "put bp at [bp+2]" thing?
I don't know; it is old code from Pat Villani. Perhaps it wanted to do an extra
"pop bp" from that place but bp was already set to sp so that would be
wrong too.
>> -pushbp ; tr
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi Bart,
>
> thanks for making the patch much shorter, very "commitable" now :-)
>
> Why did our old code do that complex "put bp at [bp+2]" thing? And
don't know
> what does the "cpm_error jump decision now inverted" patch mean?
skips the call
Hi Bart,
thanks for making the patch much shorter, very "commitable" now :-)
Why did our old code do that complex "put bp at [bp+2]" thing? And
what does the "cpm_error jump decision now inverted" patch mean?
Eric
> This is a minimal fix for [entry.asm]
...
> -pushbp
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Bart Oldeman
wrote:
...
> This is a minimal fix for the kernel:
>
> --- entry.asm (révision 1371)
> +++ entry.asm (copie de travail)
...
> This bug has been there since the DOS-C days by the way!
>
> Bart
Thank you!
Patch committed along with some comments to
2009/4/30 Christian Masloch :
> There's some C library based on the CALL 5 but I never used it. My test
> case was setting up the correct registers (function in cl instead of ah,
> only functions 00h..24h valid) then using a "call 5" in DEBUG. (Be sure to
> use FreeDOS's DEBUG because MS-DOS's app
>> - Christian: entry.asm revamp to fix the CP/M call (review!)
>> http://sf.net/tracker/?func=3Ddetail&aid=3D2421577&group_id=3D5109&atid=
> =3D105109
>
> anyone know of any CP/M like programs or applications to test these with?
There's some C library based on the CALL 5 but I never used it. My t
Hi Bernd,
>> Offtopic: fdos.org was down temp because I forgot to update...
> Hi Jeremy, good to hear from you.
Definitely :-)
> This would probably be a bad time for announcing I've lost fdos.org ftp
I did not even know you had one! So you could actually have
fixed some of the way outdated
Kenneth J. Davis schreef:
> Offtopic: fdos.org was down temp because I forgot to update my credit
> card info when my bank issued me a new one a few months back (possible
> leak of info or something) and I'm still working getting my registar
> information corrected so I can insure the domain name
free time at last...
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi Bart, admins, others,
>
>>> Would you like to have access again? Should be no problem :-)
>
>> Sure!
>
> Apparently only Aitor, Jim and Pat can give you SVN write
> access but I think that would be a *very* nice idea...
Hi Bart, admins, others,
>> Would you like to have access again? Should be no problem :-)
> Sure!
Apparently only Aitor, Jim and Pat can give you SVN write
access but I think that would be a *very* nice idea... ;-).
I noticed Pat already uploaded your SYS OW 1.8 fix :-).
If you plan to patch
Hi Eric,
2009/4/25 Eric Auer :
> Would you like to have access again? Should be no problem :-)
Sure!
> Question about the change in OpenWatcom headers which
> now apparently want 32 bit arguments for 16 bit values,
> which breaks not only SYS but also other DOS apps:
>
> - why did they do it?
Hi Bart,
> here's a patch to be able to compile SYS with OW 1.8. I've lost SVN
> commit access...
Would you like to have access again? Should be no problem :-)
> +#if defined(__WATCOMC__) && __WATCOMC__ < 1280
>unsigned short date, time;
> +#else
> + unsigned date, time;
> +#endif
Questio
12 matches
Mail list logo
