On 14.09.2016 10:43, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Again ping for review, please it completely blocks the whole job.
On 09/07/2016 03:27 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
ping for review
On 08/24/2016 01:58 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
And here is how the run looks like:
$ ipa-run-tests test_integration/test_topology
Again ping for review, please it completely blocks the whole job.
On 09/07/2016 03:27 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
ping for review
On 08/24/2016 01:58 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
And here is how the run looks like:
$ ipa-run-tests test_integration/test_topology.py
WARNING: Couldn't write lextab module '
ping for review
On 08/24/2016 01:58 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
And here is how the run looks like:
$ ipa-run-tests test_integration/test_topology.py
WARNING: Couldn't write lextab module 'pycparser.lextab'. [Errno 13]
Permission denied: 'lextab.py'
WARNING: yacc table file version is out of date
WA
Hi Martin,
Updated the test according to our discussion.
There are 2 patches: the one related to the dynamic segment naming and
the one that xfails one of the tests which fails due to trac ticket 6250.
Please, disregard my previous patch
On 08/12/2016 04:05 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 12.08
And here is how the run looks like:
$ ipa-run-tests test_integration/test_topology.py
WARNING: Couldn't write lextab module 'pycparser.lextab'. [Errno 13]
Permission denied: 'lextab.py'
WARNING: yacc table file version is out of date
WARNING: Couldn't create 'pycparser.yacctab'. [Errno 13] Perm
On 12.08.2016 15:48, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 08/11/2016 10:05 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10.08.2016 20:32, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hello,
before we jump into fixing tests, my question is: Was this planned
change and not reflected by test, or switched values are unwanted side
eff
Hi Martin,
On 08/11/2016 10:05 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10.08.2016 20:32, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hello,
before we jump into fixing tests, my question is: Was this planned
change and not reflected by test, or switched values are unwanted side
effect and thus bug for us?
That's a marvelo
On 10.08.2016 20:32, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hello,
before we jump into fixing tests, my question is: Was this planned
change and not reflected by test, or switched values are unwanted side
effect and thus bug for us?
Ticket contains almost no info, except a traceback and it says nothing.