Re: Proxy accounting problem

2004-09-24 Thread Stephan Jaeger
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 11:10 -0400, Alan DeKok wrote: > Stephan Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But it's not possible to get only one detail file with the local > > tickets? > > Yes. You can set Acct-Type for the non-proxied requests, and have a > sub-section of accounting{}, with that Acc

Re: Proxy accounting problem

2004-09-24 Thread Alan DeKok
Stephan Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But it's not possible to get only one detail file with the local > tickets? Yes. You can set Acct-Type for the non-proxied requests, and have a sub-section of accounting{}, with that Acct-Type, and put "detail" inside of it. Alan DeKok. - List in

Re: Proxy accounting problem

2004-09-24 Thread Stephan Jaeger
Hi, thanks, for your fast answer. On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 10:29 -0400, Alan DeKok wrote: > Stephan Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i'm having a proxy problem with newer freeradius versions. While 0.9.2 > > as a proxy send an accounting response for a request which wasn't to be > > proxied a

Re: Proxy accounting problem

2004-09-24 Thread Alan DeKok
Stephan Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm having a proxy problem with newer freeradius versions. While 0.9.2 > as a proxy send an accounting response for a request which wasn't to be > proxied and with an empty accounting section (in radiusd.conf), newer > versions at least everything >= s

Proxy accounting problem

2004-09-24 Thread Stephan Jaeger
Hi, i'm having a proxy problem with newer freeradius versions. While 0.9.2 as a proxy send an accounting response for a request which wasn't to be proxied and with an empty accounting section (in radiusd.conf), newer versions at least everything >= snapshot 2004/21/06 and <= 1.0.1 just ignore t