> Question for the FT developers : why was this seed calculation
> implemented this way ? And not e.g. a fixed start value associated
> with each FT_Face created ? That would make FT output reproducable
> (and testable for detecting regressions).
I have no idea. :-) Patches are welcome. Up to no
> I find the random generator, but it can’t explain what I’m
> experiencing.
Have you read this comment in the description of FT_Library
For multi-threading applications each thread should have its own
FT_Library object.
and are you following the advice?
Werner
___
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
I find the random generator, but it can’t explain what I’m experiencing.
Celine.
De : freetype-devel-bounces+celine.pillet=tagginfo@nongnu.org
[mailto:freetype-devel-bounces+celine.pillet=tagginfo@nongnu.org] De la
part de John Tytgat
Envoyé : mar
On 5/3/2011 9:52 AM, PILLET Céline wrote:
I have a problem with hints of PostScript fonts.
I create 2 consecutives bitmap with a postscript font, with a
multithread program, and rendering differs slightly.
I don’t have this problem when I create bitmap without “hints”.
I don’t have this pro
> If these difference is not so important, I propose to change
> sfnt_get_ps_name() to thin wrapper of tt_face_get_name().
Looks good. If you don't notice adverse effects please commit.
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongn
Hello guys,
I have a problem with hints of PostScript fonts.
I create 2 consecutives bitmap with a postscript font, with a multithread
program, and rendering differs slightly.
I don’t have this problem when I create bitmap without “hints”.
I don’t have this problem when I create bitmap with “hint