Il giorno 6-04-2011 1:42, peterh...@cruzio.com ha scritto:
>> Speaking of LBA48... Yellow Dog Linux and Debian Linux both report and use
>> the full 250 GB (because that is the size of my HD) in my QS 2001. But Mac
>> OS 10.5 sees it as a 128 GB drive.
Woah! :-o
So it isn't an hardware limitation
> Speaking of LBA48... Yellow Dog Linux and Debian Linux both report and use
> the full 250 GB (because that is the size of my HD) in my QS 2001. But Mac
> OS 10.5 sees it as a 128 GB drive. I know this has nothing to do with the
> thread. But good info none the less.
MacOS X is pretty blind. It
Speaking of LBA48... Yellow Dog Linux and Debian Linux both report and use the
full 250 GB (because that is the size of my HD) in my QS 2001. But Mac OS 10.5
sees it as a 128 GB drive. I know this has nothing to do with the thread. But
good info none the less.
> Actually, the only significant d
> BUT… before I can do that, I need to know for sure if the Dual-1 GHz
> QS2002
> has any issues in a QS2001.
>
> Because otherwise (both cases) I'll have to wipe the dream of 2×1 GHz out
> of
> my mind…
Any QS 2001 proc will work in a QS 2002.
Any QS 2002 proc will work in a QS 2001.
Actually,
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers [CORRECTION]
Date:Tuesday, 05. April 2011
From:peterh...@cruzio.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> Giga-Designs carefully worked around the physical and electrical
> differences,
- Original Message
> From: Bruce Johnson
.
>
> At issue in many of these cases is an assured chain of physical handling:
>something sent via email can be intercepted and changed in transmission; a
>fax
>cannot.
>
>
Well, sort of -- certainly in the electronic transmission o
Hi!
Merely out of confusion:
Will a Dual-1GHz G4 processor card, which obviously comes from a QS2002, work
in an original QS from 2001?
I ask because I've read an item description on eBay once stating that the
Dual-800 is the highest usable stock processor for the original QS. The seller
spec
> Sorry. This is wrong.
>
> A dual processor card from a Gigabit Ethernet won't fit *physically* into
> a
> Digitial Audio/Quicksilver/Quicksilver 2002. It is mirrored in its design
> – it
> would extend towards the memory banks and overlap them, hence won't be
> fittable
> at all (even though the
-- Original message --
Subject: Re: Differences between single and dual G4 Quicksilvers
Date:Sunday, 17. October 2010
From:"Mac User #330250"
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> > So what are my options on the slow single G4-800 on a QS2002?
…
> You could use a Dual-
On Apr 5, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
>
> It appears that for "one off" legal transactions, using a FAX machine is
> easier than getting a valid signed written agreement prior to the electronic
> transaction.
Precisely. Also, (and hopefully) one of the outcomes of the current mortg
On 2011/04/04 21:52, Kris Tilford wrote:
Fax is a dying technology, it would certainly be easier to scan the
documents and then email them, which I would think would nearly always
be the preferred solution.
When I purchased my NOS (New Old Stock) Power Mac G5 in February of
2008, I could not r
On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:42 PM, peterh...@cruzio.com wrote:
The law is a conservative, slow-moving, ponderous luddite at times.
Indeed so.
I don't believe a FAX is necessary unless the transactions are
"unilateral", meaning the parties involved don't have a prior written
agreement to abide b
>> Fax is a dying technology, it would certainly be easier to scan the
>> documents and then email them, which I would think would nearly always
>> be the preferred solution.
>
> Legally speaking, possessing faxed documents with a signature are usually
> considered the same as possessing the origi
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:52 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
>
> Fax is a dying technology, it would certainly be easier to scan the documents
> and then email them, which I would think would nearly always be the preferred
> solution.
Legally speaking, possessing faxed documents with a signature are usuall
> finally found a way to lose weight that works and is actually healthy
> for you! let me know if you have any questions
> about it.
>
Question: Would you please take some more of that berry stuff?
I mean, just enough to get to weight 0.
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-
15 matches
Mail list logo