https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab ---
../../gcc/expr.c:1146:60: error: unused parameter 'mode'
[-Werror=unused-parameter]
move_by_pieces_d::generate (rtx op0, rtx op1, machine_mode mode)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086
--- Comment #15 from owner at bugs dot debian.org ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||12086
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski
: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160603 (experimental) [trunk revision 237082] (GCC)
$:
$: gcc-trunk -O3 small.c -w
small.c: In function ‘fn2’:
small.c:6:6: error: integral result type precision does not match field size of
BIT_FIELD_REF
void fn2() {
^~~
BIT_FIELD_REF
cc1: note: in statement
_70
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00316.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66947
Austin Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asbeer at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fro
=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160603 (experimental) [trunk revision 237059] (GCC)
$
$ g++-6.1 -c small.cpp
$ clang++ -c small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp: In member function ‘void A::foo()’:
small.cpp:4:35: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Further reduced test
SUBROUTINE SQRINT (LFILE,IREGION,LENGTH)
DIMENSION IREGION(LENGTH)
LOGICAL DSKWRK,MASWRK
IF (DSKWRK.OR.MASWRK) READ(LFILE, END=200) IREGION
200 CONTINUE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71316
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71316
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jun 3 23:12:39 2016
New Revision: 237083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71316
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
--- Comment #10 from Kris ---
Thank you for the effort.
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, pault at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
>
> Paul Thomas changed:
>
>What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71316
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38640
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38640&action=edit
proposed patch
testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry about the breakage. Looking into it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I can only guess until I get a test case. Perhaps the undo_symbols was too
agressive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #3 from Anton Mitrokhin ---
Could anyone please take a look on this?
The big reproducer still triggers ICE as for gcc version 7.0.0 20160601
(experimental) (Revision=237011/svn-rev:237016/).
The small reproducer seems to work
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160603 (experimental) [trunk revision 237059] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -O1 small.cpp
$ g++-6.1 -Os small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -Os small.cpp
small.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
small.cpp:17:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27100
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 27100, which changed state.
Bug 27100 Summary: ICE with multiple friend declarations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27100
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27100
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Fri Jun 3 20:42:08 2016
New Revision: 237078
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237078&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/27100
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/27100
* decl.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853
--- Comment #15 from Howard Brodale ---
The arr pointer is being set to the incremented value which is the 2nd element
in the array to start from as the arr[0] value, then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853
--- Comment #14 from Howard Brodale ---
My email address now is brod...@sbcglobal.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853
Howard Brodale changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brodhow at sbcglobal dot net
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
Bug ID: 71404
Summary: [7 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160603 (experimental) [trunk revision 237059] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-6.1 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$
-
char a, c;
short b;
int
main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71402
Bug ID: 71402
Summary: -Wunused-variable warnings ignore initialization side
effects
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70751
--- Comment #4 from Jiong Wang ---
Thanks, I will prepare a patch after various testing OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70751
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71401
Bug ID: 71401
Summary: [7 regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails
starting with r237003
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71325
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
libintl is part of GNU gettext and local changes in GCC should be avoided
if not needed, report problems there if still applicable to the current
version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71276
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71277
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71277
--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:49:04 2016
New Revision: 237074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add option for whether ceil etc. can raise "inexact", adjust x86 conditi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71276
--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:49:04 2016
New Revision: 237074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add option for whether ceil etc. can raise "inexact", adjust x86 conditi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71259
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143
--- Comment #4 from Vidya Praveen ---
I can confirm that this started from r236221.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42014
Marcin Baczyński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marbacz at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143
Vidya Praveen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65095
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69575
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67841
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69734
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68618
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67630
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68661
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67634
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69596
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70751
--- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang ---
Vlad,
Do you have any comments on this regression?
*arm_movsi_insn has the following operand constraints:
operand 0: "=rk,r,r,r,rk,m"
operand 1: "rk, I,K,j,mi,rk"
As r235184 won't explicitly refuse an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71400
Bug ID: 71400
Summary: [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Jun 3 14:20:53 2016
New Revision: 237069
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237069&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52171
* builtins.c (expand_cmpstrn_o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71362
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71259
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started to ICE with r230098, before that it worked properly. ICE got fixed with
r232153, but it is miscompiled already then, so it is unclear when this
wrong-code has been introduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> Created attachment 38638 [details]
> gcc7-pr70847.patch
>
> So, shall I test this version?
> As added bonus, if cp_fold returns for different stmts the same re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38638
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38638&action=edit
gcc7-pr70847.patch
So, shall I test this version?
As added bonus, if cp_fold returns for different stmts the s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Jun 3 13:18:25 2016
New Revision: 237067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-03 Bill Schmidt
PR target/70957
* gcc.targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I had in mind:
--- cp-gimplify.c.jj1 2016-06-02 18:35:18.0 +0200
+++ cp-gimplify.c 2016-06-03 15:06:04.465913964 +0200
@@ -941,13 +941,25 @@ cp_fold_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtr
*stmt_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Jun 3 13:14:26 2016
New Revision: 237066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-03 Bill Schmidt
PR target/70957
* gcc.targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70748
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I just tried this with 7.0.0 20160603, and seems it may have been fixed?
This PR seems to have been fixed between revisions r236300 (2016-05-16, ICE)
and r236559 (2016-05-21, compiles).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
--- Comment #2 from Ludovic Courtès ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> I tried a bootstrap of the GCC 5.3.0 release as taken from one of the
> mirrors in:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
>
> This was done on an ARMv8-A machine insid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70748
--- Comment #2 from Antony Lewis ---
I just tried this with 7.0.0 20160603, and seems it may have been fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Note, the patch has been successfully bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
> and i686-linux.
>
> I don't think such shared trees should be occurring signific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, the patch has been successfully bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
and i686-linux.
I don't think such shared trees should be occurring significantly that it would
matter.
But, if you want to handl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Following patch fixes the failure:
--cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 7e9f511..cf5e460 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -19311,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #9 from Franz Sirl ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Created attachment 38636 [details]
> gcc7-pr70847.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Applied to gcc-6-branch r237059, no testsuite regressions. Testcase from
comment 6 and or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried a bootstrap of the GCC 5.3.0 release as taken from one of the mirrors
in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
This was done on an ARMv8-A machine inside an aarch32 chroot with binutils 2.24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71259
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So is this PR now fixed on the branch and still broken on the trunk?
If yes, we should turn it into [7 Regression] then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asankau at millenniumit dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, as Jakub mentioned in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00268.html
C++ FE should reject initialization of a variable length object.
clang++ 3.7.0 rejects the reduced test case:
clang++ tc.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #36 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, matthew.fortune at imgtec dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
>
> --- Comment #35 from Matthew Fortune ---
> (In reply to Aurelien Jarno from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71398
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71387
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 3 11:01:39 2016
New Revision: 237060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237060&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71387
* cgraph.c (cgraph_edge::redirect_call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #35 from Matthew Fortune ---
(In reply to Aurelien Jarno from comment #33)
> (In reply to Hector Oron from comment #32)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31)
> > > eipa_sra introduces the remaining SSA name with non-defaul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378
--- Comment #7 from asankau at millenniumit dot com ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> (In reply to asankau from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to asankau from comment #3)
> > > > Hi,
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
Bug ID: 71399
Summary: GCC 5.3.0 bootstrap comparison failure on
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71398
Bug ID: 71398
Summary: ICE at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit mode on
x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, find_edge)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (gdb) p debug_rtx (insn)
> (insn 198 206 199 11 (set (mem/c:V16QI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)
> (const_int -664 [0xfd68])) [7 MEM[(value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70735
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
