https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7b7818f3dbd14cc7577d25dcebaded07395c476
commit r11-346-ga7b7818f3dbd14cc7577d25dcebaded07395c476
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95098
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Just to quote EVRP sees
:
_1 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(f);
_2 = _1 & 1048575;
if (_2 != 0)
goto ; [INV]
else
goto ; [INV]
:
_3 = f.x;
_4 = (unsigned int) _3;
y_8 = _4 * 4096;
if (y_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95019
--- Comment #2 from zhongyunde at tom dot com ---
It is a generic issue for all targets, such as x86, it also don't enpand IVOPTs
as index is not used for DEST and Src directly. we may need expand IVOPTs, then
different targets can select differe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95098
Bug ID: 95098
Summary: Out of scope variable visible during debugging at Og
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|85316 |
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #28 from Richard Biener ---
> It the growth limit seems could be refined. The ^ is an exponent operation,
> right?
Yes. The idea is to limit growth more when there is no benefit of unrolling
detected by the cost model (which current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
--- Comment #7 from Krzysztof Nowicki ---
Thanks for the very quick response. I've applied the patch on top of GCC 9.1
and it indeed fixes the problem we've seen on MIPS64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95019
--- Comment #1 from bin cheng ---
Please provide the exact configuration/compilation command lines in bug report
next time, which could save others' time to reproduce. Considering I didn't
touch mips for years.
As for this specific issue, note
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bin Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6e1a4cd83190746b6544917f7526fa480ca5f18
commit r11-345-gf6e1a4cd83190746b6544917f7526fa480ca5f18
Author: Bin Cheng
Date: Wed May 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #27 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #26)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #18)
> > > Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
> > > if the lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097
Bug ID: 95097
Summary: Missed optimization with bitfield value ranges
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #26 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #18)
> > Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
> > if the loop has multi-exits or upbound is not a fixed numbe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #25 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #18)
> > > Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
> > > if th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fec3f62b9bfc03e5088a09036791c2ac84fe0c8
commit r11-344-g0fec3f62b9bfc03e5088a09036791c2ac84fe0c8
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri May 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95078
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> TER should go away, not be extended. So you are suggesting that we replace
>
> leaq44(%rdi,%rdx,4), %rdx --- redundant could be fwprop
> mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95023
--- Comment #2 from Ye Luo ---
I got the following error when building the new lib. Tried gcc 8 and 10 with
master and newlib-3.3.0. No difference
/home/yeluo/opt/build-amdgcn-gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/yeluo/opt/build-amdgcn-gcc/./gcc/ -nostdinc
-B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094
--- Comment #3 from Inbal Levi ---
Actually, you are right,
I'm currently working on a paper to change it, should have waited for
afterward.
The reason to change it is to align (...) with C behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95093
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95096
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
Created https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545638.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95096
Bug ID: 95096
Summary: Feature request: add -fsplit-dwarf
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But this doesn't seem like a very useful behaviour for the extension.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
Rafael Avila de Espindola changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael at espindo dot la
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95095
Bug ID: 95095
Summary: Feature request: support -fno-unique-section-names
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugs at m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094
Bug ID: 95094
Summary: alignof(reference_to_type) doesn't return
alignof(referenced_type) as it ought to, by the
standard
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a0225e47868fbfceaecaa5e2de96c1c5a2251ea
commit r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfceaecaa5e2de96c1c5a2251ea
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90b160f8ec515f54ddc36519a6aaa60abdabdec1
commit r11-336-g90b160f8ec515f54ddc36519a6aaa60abdabdec1
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95087
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94906
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94906
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45a6686e76bfcd48f7c72a23d0e15186f76b4bfc
commit r9-8588-g45a6686e76bfcd48f7c72a23d0e15186f76b4bfc
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95092
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95093
Bug ID: 95093
Summary: Implement DR 1966, Colon following enumeration
elaborated-type-specifier
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac627eb4162d31aa4d009c3c9a8da7dfd6cc34e0
commit r11-335-gac627eb4162d31aa4d009c3c9a8da7dfd6cc34e0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #14 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 06:43:54PM +, seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
>
> --- Comment #13 from Bill Seurer ---
> I don't know fortran and this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #13 from Bill Seurer ---
I don't know fortran and this appears to be part of a multi-thousand line
extremely complex function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79706
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ah good point.
struct A {
void operator delete(void*) = delete;
void operator delete[](void*) = delete;
};
A* f();
A* f2();
using type1 = decltype(delete f());
using type2 = decltype(delete[] f2());
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79706
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Probably the same issue:
>
> struct A {
> void operator delete(void*) = delete;
> void operator delete[](void*) = delete;
> };
>
> using type1 = decltype(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94998
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed on master branch so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94998
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d17cdc17c90ce77cb90c569322c1f241d3530cec
commit r11-333-gd17cdc17c90ce77cb90c569322c1f241d3530cec
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue May 12 10:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79706
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #11)
> /home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/gfortran -c -o
> module_ra_cam.fppized.o -I. -I./netcdf/include -I./inc -m64 -O0 -g3
> -mcpu=power8 -Wno-depr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a6790fb4e5090624fbd71e2b895e6bdd5319fd7
commit r11-332-g8a6790fb4e5090624fbd71e2b895e6bdd5319fd7
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #11 from Bill Seurer ---
/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/gfortran -c -o
module_ra_cam.fppized.o -I. -I./netcdf/include -I./inc -m64 -O0 -g3
-mcpu=power8 -Wno-deprecated-declarations -fconvert=big-endian -std=legacy
module_ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95092
Bug ID: 95092
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/asan/pr95051.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95091
Bug ID: 95091
Summary: ICE in gfc_hash_value, at fortran/class.c:538
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
Bug ID: 95090
Summary: ICE: identifier overflow: 129
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95089
Bug ID: 95089
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2843
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 78752, which changed state.
Bug 78752 Summary: [concepts] ICE with constrained variadic member function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:955b1f929906cabc5b17c40cbc7d767eebd64cc7
commit r11-331-g955b1f929906cabc5b17c40cbc7d767eebd64cc7
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95088
Bug ID: 95088
Summary: ICE in gfc_build_class_symbol, at fortran/class.c:653
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa31a3cdbf1571286671d8d3a83e31676862583e
commit r11-330-gfa31a3cdbf1571286671d8d3a83e31676862583e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86142
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44665
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a2dea6b63ae600eb1d084c06d8a3ba42c66dd6b
commit r11-323-g2a2dea6b63ae600eb1d084c06d8a3ba42c66dd6b
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6416f67273aaeafd6ad89c2c82076dabb50f8dbe
commit r11-322-g6416f67273aaeafd6ad89c2c82076dabb50f8dbe
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95087
Bug ID: 95087
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:14382
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95081
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95085
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nico at josuttis dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95086
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95086
Bug ID: 95086
Summary: brace initialization in captures doesn't work with
function calls
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95085
Bug ID: 95085
Summary: diagnostic on designated-initializer from
braced-init-list could be better
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 12 May 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
>
> --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
> The problem is since df_lr_bb_local_compute has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95084
Bug ID: 95084
Summary: code sinking prevents if-conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95083
Bug ID: 95083
Summary: x86 fp_movcc expansion depends on real_cst sharing
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
STV generates:
8d b6 00 00 00 00 lea0x0(%esi),%esi
a1 00 00 00 00 mov0x0,%eax R_386_32target_p
83 ec 08sub$0x8,%esp
f3 0f 7e 00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082
Bug ID: 95082
Summary: LE implementations of vec_cnttz_lsbb and
vec_cntlz_lsbb are wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
This ia32 psABI return value discussion also applies here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/ia32-abi/return$20value%7Csort:date/ia32-abi/9H4BBrIdkmk/sjWw06ZPnS4J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> GCC doesn't tail-call because the return types are not compatible. With a
> call
> it cannot optimize the stack adjustment because of the ABI.
>
> Note I'm not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
The problem is since df_lr_bb_local_compute has
/* If the def is to only part of the reg, it does
not kill the other defs that reach here. */
if (!(DF_REF_FLAGS (def) & (DF_REF_PARTIAL |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Bug 57359 depends on bug 94988, which changed state.
Bug 94988 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c
scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:119a7db1e05c9741803b3ff93266b00fd535732a
commit r11-320-g119a7db1e05c9741803b3ff93266b00fd535732a
Author: Richard Biener
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95032
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(It currently enables p10 insns, but it leaves p9 insns disabled (and any
older insns your compiler doesn't default to as well)).
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
