http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31298
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31298
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|burnus at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 16:45
---
Shouldn't have a target milestone (no regression and not fixed)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 15:21 ---
Check that the renamed imported operator is not imported again, see PR 33541.
If I recall correctly, this part is missing for the patch in PR 33541
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31298
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-26 18:37 ---
Subject: Bug 31298
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Aug 26 18:37:23 2007
New Revision: 127812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127812
Log:
2007-08-26 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-26 18:43 ---
REMAINING: operator(generic opterator) = operator(user operator)
e.g. operator(+) = operator(.myplus.)
For obvious reasons the reversed is not allowed (MRC claims that also the
former is invalid, but I think they
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 08:14 ---
Rejecting operator(.procedure.) has been fixed by PR33072.
Accepting multiple renames/imports of an operator (operator(.op.),
operator(.myop.)=operator(.op.)) is fixed by the submitted patch
--- Comment #11 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-17 15:10 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31298
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01081.html
--
