Re: [Gendergap] "anonymous (street meat)"

Hi Contrary to Dominic's response, which is beautifully-written as always, I believe Ms. Chinea would like to take a look at the Conflict of Interest guidelines located here [1]. The Conflict of Interest Noticeboard has her issue currently listed [2]. The userpage and the article about Ms. Chinea

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 60

gt; *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.* >> -- >> http://www.sarahstierch.com/ >> -- next part -- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://lists.wiki

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 60

> > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:43:02 -0700 > From: Migdia Chinea > Subject: [Gendergap] "anonymous (street meat)" > To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > Message-ID: > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1&quo

[Gendergap] "anonymous (street meat)"

Itp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(Street_Meat) wish to go on record that this experience was personal, contentious, humilliating and has had an intended stifling effect. The people who took down "anonymous (street meat)" were some of the same people that had been involved with the "Saturday

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 60

2011 08:43:02 -0700 > From: Migdia Chinea > Subject: [Gendergap] "anonymous (street meat)" > To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > tp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(Stre

Re: [Gendergap] "anonymous (street meat)"

Michael, I think that response is overly harsh, even if it is true that Migdia's contributions were not appropriate for the encyclopedia. While there are certainly spammers who act in bad faith, often what Wikipedians see as self-promotion is not seen or intended that way by those who contribut

[Gendergap] From Jezebel: "Men’s Rights Fight Breaks Out On Wikipedia"

http://jezebel.com/e_harm/ -- GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art and Sarah Stierch Consulting *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.* -

Re: [Gendergap] Deterrent

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 14:58, Mig wrote: > I believe that men editors have targeted me for and with their biases and > have done everything they could to humiliate me publicly , which acts as a > deterrent to female editors who are not well connected with wikipedia ranks.   > Please refer to m

[Gendergap] Deterrent

I believe that men editors have targeted me for and with their biases and have done everything they could to humiliate me publicly , which acts as a deterrent to female editors who are not well connected with wikipedia ranks. Please refer to my page. Thank u. Migdia Chinea Sent from Migdia's

Re: [Gendergap] "anonymous (street meat)"

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Nathan wrote: > I looked at the discussion > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anonymous_(Street_Meat)) > and didn't see personal remarks or innuendo. Can you point me to them? > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Migdia Chinea > wro

Re: [Gendergap] "anonymous (street meat)"

I looked at the discussion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anonymous_(Street_Meat)) and didn't see personal remarks or innuendo. Can you point me to them? On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Migdia Chinea wrote: > tp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(Street_Meat) > >

[Gendergap] "anonymous (street meat)"

tp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(Street_Meat) This deletion was filled with personal remarks and innouendo. It was discouraging of the posting bny any women. I'm angry and frustrated to have been singled out. Is that treatment to be expected? Thank you -- Migdia Chinea -- Migdia & Cice