> I meant, purely in terms of Hadoop putting forward the TLP motion to the
> board, with incubator's endorsement. But let's let options play out and
> find out what incubator recommends first. I wasn't suggesting that Hadoop
> would have some additional responsibilities here, in terms of mentorin
On 6/25/2010 12:40 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>>
>> But the Incubator doesn't just say yes/no. We can refer this back to Hadoop
>> proposing this as a TLP, and even offer the list of mentors as observers, or
>> members of the initial PMC.
>
> The Hadoop PMC is wholly unqualified to manage Chukwa. I
I agree with the analysis from Jerome and Greg. All three of Chukwa's
current committers are its original contributors. An important- and
often difficult- part of Apache community is growing and managing the
developers working on the project. Some experience adding people in
the Incubator would be
Hi,
As one of the initial contributor, I still think that the incubator road is the
good one even if it's just for a short period of time.
The incubator will gives us the ability to get some committers outside of the
initial group of people and to mature the project.
When we will have reach that
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:34 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> Yes, it seems that Hadoop PMC should supervise the vote for the chair, with
> a slightly frustrating cc list of all of the actual committers to chukwa.
> That way, nominations and votes for chair are archived on a private list.
>
> But
On 6/25/2010 3:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 21:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> Is anyone in agreement with ant? Otherwise we should just move ahead
>> and can hold a separate vote on allowing tlp resource creation at this
>> time.
>>
>> If the proposers want (Eric
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 21:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
>>> website/svn/MLs because I think Chukwa should just go directly
+1 for 1.
Regards,
Eric
On 6/24/10 12:21 PM, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote:
> On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
>>> website/svn/MLs because I think Chukwa sh
