On 09/09/2010 07:15, Greg Stein wrote:
> Just to clarify: I'm assuming you're saying "+1 to the proposal",
> rather than to my comment. Correct?
+1 indeed, to the proposal
+1 actually, to the mailing list comment, too.
The Incubator PMC might consider that establishing sufficient interest
which
Just to clarify: I'm assuming you're saying "+1 to the proposal",
rather than to my comment. Correct?
And to clarify for myself: I have no opinion on the proposal itself. I
timed out after "Java" and the next few buzzwords. Thankfully, this
proposal didn't say "framework" or I may have timed out a
On 08/09/2010 13:44, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
>> community has voted (see
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser
+1 (non-binding)
Small point: if a Mentor must be a Member, I can't be one, because I'm not.
p
On 08/09/2010 16:00, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> +1 (Notbinding)
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks wrote:
>>> ...
>>
>>> *Mailing
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 10:18 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Change name of Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache
> Connectors Framework
>
> Hi,
>
> After much debate both here
On 9/8/2010 8:44 AM, ant elder wrote:
> -0
>
> I agree with the comments from David and others such as [1] and the
> suggestion at [2] to call it something more abstract like Apache
> Connecto.
>
> Thats IMHO anyway, I'm not sure that the IPMC should be the ones with
> binding votes on this but i
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> -0.5 (non-binding), I find the proposed name rather confusing
-1.
I should probably have listened in (and participated) on the previous
discussion, but I agree with Kalle. "Connector" is such a wide term,
that I doubt that such community w
[x] +1 Change the Lucene Connector Framework to the Apache Connector Framework.
Mike
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [x] +1 Change the Lucene Connector Framework to the Apache Connector Framework
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> --
Hi,
[x] +1 Change the Lucene Connector Framework to the Apache Connector Framework
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apa
-0.5 (non-binding), I find the proposed name rather confusing
Kalle
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
> community has voted (see
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connecto
On 09/08/2010 11:06 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>> On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>>
>>
>>> What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
co
On Sep 8, 2010, at 1:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks wrote:
>> ...
>
>> *Mailing Lists*
>>
>> kitty-dev
>> kitty-commits
>> kitty-user
>>
>
> Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
> community across dev/user does not make se
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>> On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>>
>>
>>> What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
>>> components
>>> that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the
+1 (Notbinding)
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks wrote:
>>...
>
>> *Mailing Lists*
>>
>> kitty-dev
>> kitty-commits
>> kitty-user
>>
>
> Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
> community across dev/user d
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not coping
the
code, but using components that hav
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
> What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
> components
> that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not
> coping the
> code, but using components that have been built and maintained elsewhere
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not
coping the
code, but using components that have been built and maintained elsewhere
under ASL
but used as dependencies for running.
I assu
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
> community has voted (see
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser)
> and would like to officially change our
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
> community has voted (see
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser)
> and would like to officially change our
Hi,
After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
community has voted (see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser)
and would like to officially change our name to be the "Apache Connectors
Framework". We would like the I
On 8 September 2010 12:39, dan haywood wrote:
> And another benefit of putting user traffic on the dev list is that
> it'll give the devs exposure to any probs that regular users are having with
> actually using the framework (ie so we can mature its documentation etc)
In ASF projects I would
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:39 AM, dan haywood
wrote:
>
> For the moment at least the dev community is more active (or at least more
> vocal), so their mailing list should be the main focal point. As I said in
> the other email, when we have more user traffic than dev traffic, then
> we can vote to
On 8 September 2010 12:19, Robert Matthews wrote:
> One point against this is that we have had a long-standing user list, ...
>
> ... People are used to
> the user list already.
We do, but it's going to change anyway when we make the apache mailing list
available.
> If we are going to comb
On 8 September 2010 12:16, James Carman wrote:
> Isn't Isis a different bird though? It has been around for a long time and
> is likely to actually have existing users
>
It has some, but not enough to be sustainable. Hence entry into
the incubator to build both its user and developer communiti
One point against this is that we have had a long-standing user list,
and it is the developer list that is new and growing. People are use to
the user list already. If we are going to combine the two then I
suggest we have a -user list now and let the developers grow out of
that.
Rob
On Wed, 20
Isn't Isis a different bird though? It has been around for a long time and
is likely to actually have existing users
On Sep 8, 2010 7:04 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> Well, we could neglect to tell anyone about the user list until we need
it.
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Dan Haywood wr
Well, we could neglect to tell anyone about the user list until we need it.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> Isis mentors:
> Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped, should
> we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined mailing list for -dev
My bad for possibly confusing things, then. Benson got it right when he
raised that ticket in the first place.
Dan
On 8 September 2010 10:33, Gav... wrote:
> The private, dev and commits list is all that has been asked for.
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2971
>
> so your
The private, dev and commits list is all that has been asked for.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2971
so your fine.
gav...
> -Original Message-
> From: mwessend...@gmail.com [mailto:mwessend...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 Septemb
+1 especially since incubation is about establishing a developers community
-M
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1
>
> I barely see the users list used in OWB and even in MyFaces ;)
>
> I'd say an isis-...@incubator.a.o + isis-comm...@i.a.o list would do fine for
> now.
>
+1
I barely see the users list used in OWB and even in MyFaces ;)
I'd say an isis-...@incubator.a.o + isis-comm...@i.a.o list would do fine for
now.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 9/8/10, Dan Haywood wrote:
> From: Dan Haywood
> Subject: Re: No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PR
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> Isis mentors:
> Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped, should
> we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined mailing list for -dev
> and -user? ...
Like Martijn and Greg I think that's a great idea.
We ran
Isis mentors:
Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped,
should we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined mailing list
for -dev and -user?
Dan
On 08/09/2010 08:10, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 20
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks wrote:
>>...
>
>> *Mailing Lists*
>>
>> kitty-dev
>> kitty-commits
>> kitty-user
>>
>
> Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
> community across dev/user does not make sens
34 matches
Mail list logo
