On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Lionel Liu wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:13:24 +0100
From: Lionel Liu
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC1]
Hi all,
The Apache Griffin community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Griffin
With those notes, I change my vote to -1 as well.
On 22 March 2018 at 22:42, John D. Ament wrote:
> On mine I get 3 files failing
>
> Unapproved licenses:
>
> DEPENDENCIES
> griffin-doc/service/postman/griffin.json
> griffin-doc/service/postman/griffin_environment.json
>
> Doing what I ass
On mine I get 3 files failing
Unapproved licenses:
DEPENDENCIES
griffin-doc/service/postman/griffin.json
griffin-doc/service/postman/griffin_environment.json
Doing what I assume is the same thing as Matt (mvn apache-rat:check from
the source release folder) . In addition to what he's noted
I should note that I'm building this from the source zip file.
On 22 March 2018 at 22:19, John D. Ament wrote:
> When you execute a release using the Apache parent pom, one of the files
> generated is a DEPENDENCIES file. For almost all projects, this file is
> empty. However it doesn't play w
I ran that command and got the following:
*
Summary
---
Generated at: 2018-03-22T22:18:53-05:00
Notes: 4
Binaries: 52
Archives: 0
Standards: 21
Apache Licensed: 20
Generated Documents: 0
JavaDocs are generated and so license header is opti
When you execute a release using the Apache parent pom, one of the files
generated is a DEPENDENCIES file. For almost all projects, this file is
empty. However it doesn't play well with rat.
John
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:18 PM Lionel Liu wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> What DEPENDENCIES files are cau
Hi Matt,
What DEPENDENCIES files are causing the rat check fail in your environment ?
We had set the exclusion list of some files in pom.xml, with profile id
apache-release, the rat check will success by running `mvn -Papache-release
clean apache-rat:check`
Thanks,
Lionel
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at
+1
* Signatures ok
* Builds ok
* Tests are failing with a NullPointerException inside
maven-surefire-plugin, not sure why.
* Rat check ok
On 22 March 2018 at 21:47, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote:
> Hi All,
> This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) version
> 5.0.0-alpha
>
>
>
> The
Hi All,
This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) version
5.0.0-alpha
The Apache SkyWalking community has tested, voted and approved the proposed
release of Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) 5.0.0-alpha
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on thi
+1
Thanks, Vincent
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> +1
>
> * GPG checked
> * Build/test checked
>
> Note that your DEPENDENCIES file is causing the rat check to fail and
> should probably be added to the exclusion list. I also had a couple test
> failures in Java 10 relati
+1
* GPG checked
* Build/test checked
Note that your DEPENDENCIES file is causing the rat check to fail and
should probably be added to the exclusion list. I also had a couple test
failures in Java 10 relating to some Spark classes in case you're curious.
On 22 March 2018 at 21:23, Lionel Liu w
+1
Thanks,
Lionel
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:21 AM, William Guo wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> William
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Lionel Liu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > The Apache Griffin community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> > release Apache Griffin 0.2.0-rc1.
> > W
+1
Thanks,
William
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Lionel Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
> The Apache Griffin community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Griffin 0.2.0-rc1.
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
> this incubator release
Hi all,
The Apache Griffin community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Griffin 0.2.0-rc1.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release candidate.
Apache Griffin is data quality service for modern data system, it
def
Alan,
i'm not sure what karma you're looking for. I just checked both accounts.
- If samoa is using git-wip-us then they already have access as they are
committers on incubator (this was likely done by secretary)
- If samoa is using gitbox/github then they already have access as they are
committ
John, can you grant karma on Samoa to Piotr Wawrzyniak (pwawrzyniak) and
Maciej Grzenda (mgrzenda). Both have recently been voted in as
committers. Their id's have been created but I do not have power to grant
them karma. Thanks.
Alan.
Ah, thanks for the clarification.
Ok, the 2.0.0 RPMs have been removed from dist, and the webpage links
updated to archive.apache.org.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 March 2018 at 19:01, Robert Butts wrote:
> > MD5s have been removed.
> >
> > Henk, I'm not sure what you m
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Ohad Shacham wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:29:55 +0100
From: Ohad Shacham
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)
Hi,
The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incuba
Forwarding my +1 from the dev list.
Alan.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Ohad Shacham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> omid-de
Hi,
The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incubating.
PPMC Vote
Call:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-omid-dev/201803.mbox/%3c1827900384.321006.1520932655...@mail.yahoo.com%3e
PPMC Vote Result:
http://mail-archives.apa
20 matches
Mail list logo