+1 (binding)
TVM has been running basically like an Apache project before joining
the incubator, and has demonstrated that it can continue to do so.
Markus
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Tianqi Chen wrote:
>
> Dear Incubator:
>
> Following a heated discussion with great support from our
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 10:27 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> I am bothered by two things that TVM does.
>
> (1) They have invented a new position between Contributor and Committer
> called “Reviewer”. I’m not sure why this was done. It seems to me that these
> individuals should just
I’m -1 (binding), because this is being rushed. I’ll be willing to change after
there is actual discussion on general@.
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 10:02 AM, Tianqi Chen wrote:
>
> Dear Incubator:
>
> Following a heated discussion with great support from our mentors,
> committers and community
Thanks Dave!
I have opened a discussion thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r215d3ecbd9bbf4db20dcaffa4fa2ec00e49e71fdcec7fa954d75f84a%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
about a while ago, and most of the original discussion happens in the
community thread(with mentors participating
Hi -
I am bothered by two things that TVM does.
(1) They have invented a new position between Contributor and Committer called
“Reviewer”. I’m not sure why this was done. It seems to me that these
individuals should just become Committers.
(2) All discussions are threaded in GitHub and then
Dear Incubator:
Following a heated discussion with great support from our mentors,
committers and community members.
The Apache(incubating) TVM community has formally voted for graduation and
bring the case to the IPMC.
Please also see the community discussion thread[1] and voting thread[2]:
Hi -
I am the only one who replied on that thread. You can reply to my concerns
there.
Thank you,
Dave
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 10:39 AM, Tianqi Chen wrote:
>
> Thanks Dave!
>
> I have opened a discussion thread
>
Thanks Dave!
> With no one subscribed to commits@ how is the PPMC watching the codebase?
>
I believe most of us watch the codebase through github instead of the
commits@.
Note that the github discuss issues (VOTE, RFC, COMMUNITY) are forwarded to
dev@(rather than commits), so we can make sure
Hi -
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 11:48 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> The Apache TVM podling PPMC has been working hard to increase
> the community participation and involvement. The Reviewer concept is
> another way we try to reward and encourage contributors to the community.
Why not
Thank you Dave!
(1) They have invented a new position between Contributor and Committer
> called “Reviewer”. I’m not sure why this was done. It seems to me that
> these individuals should just become Committers.
>
Reviewer is not an official position, but as a way for us to encourage
reviews and
Hi Dave,
The Apache TVM podling PPMC has been working hard to increase
the community participation and involvement. The Reviewer concept is
another way we try to reward and encourage contributors to the community.
As Tianqi had mentioned, ALL emails from Github are sync to dev@ list, so
no
I think Apache TVM need more Apache releases and more release manager.
TVM has two apache releases(12/05/2019 and 07/10/2020), and ONLY one
release manager(liuyizhi) [1].
[1] https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/tvm.html
Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX & Apache SkyWalking
Twitter: _WenMing
Thanks Ming.
While we agree that we have only done two releases so far, both of them are
high quality and follow the Apache release process.
We feel that the community is mature enough that we can push for graduation
as it is, and continue to push for high quality releases concurrently. It
also
+1 (binding)
The TVM (incubating) project is young.
However, I think the community is really well set up. I have no doubt that
the project will be successful and will follow the Apache way after
graduation. I'm particularly impressed by the vibrant community and all the
exciting contributions
> As per apache way, everything happens (also happens) on dev@tvm. We try to
> set up the mechanism to enable maximum participation from the community,
> while complying with ASF rules :)
> The emails from the dev@tvm are also forwarded to the github thread.
The mailing list seems to be a backup
Thanks for the comments, Ming Wen.
About the content of the list, it is not a problem and also not unusual on
changes sent to dev@ list.
Some Apache projects like MetaModel and during the early of Apache Flink
also have Github change sent to dev@ list.
Also some Apache projects have all JIRA
+1
Best,
Sebastian (one of the TVM mentors)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Yes, as Tianqi has mentioned, the PPMC members watch the commits and
development of TVM podling using Github notifications, which sent to dev@
list.
So, they are still in the podling list.
And of course we can always review the commits@ list via Pony mail [1] when
needed.
- Henry
[1]
Thanks to all who voted or provided comments!
The release has PASSED with the following IPMC votes:
+1 Dave Fisher (binding)
+1 Sheng Wu (binding)
+1 Felix Cheung (binding)
Vote thread:
19 matches
Mail list logo