i added openssl-0.9.7g not too long ago but tagged it as KEYWORDS="-*" because
it caused my openssh to segfault w/out remorse ... however, it seems that it
may just be an amd64-specific issue (or even just a my-machine-only issue)
could people do a quick test for me ? i'd suggest doing
`quickp
The latest:
I downloaded the subversion-1.1.4 source from tigris.org and did a
standard ./configure ; make ; make install. (It picked up my
installed db-4.1.25_p1-r4.) As long as I only use the binaries I
compiled svnadmin verify and svnlook work fine. If I use the Gentoo
subversion-1.1.4 bina
On Mon, 09 May 2005 04:00:08 +0300 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > * What do the maintainers of Gentoo's various -config and -update
| >scripts think about converting their scripts into eclectic
| >modules ?
|
| Neither etc-update nor env-update fall into this domain.
Heh, al
Danny van Dyk wrote:
* profile:
List and switch Gentoo portage profiles. Check if selected
profile is valid in regard to used "ARCH".
Hmm, have to check this out and see if I can obsolete my own little hack
for changing profile.
* What do we need to accomplish to get the status of an "Off
Brian Harring wrote:
Clarify please :)
Offhand, I don't see why a bin repo for a home target isn't viable,
along with a vdb repo in the same location. It's a bit trickier, but
I suspect it might be a bit more flexible in the long run.
I don't think that's possible without a lot of hacking for ma
ignore me.. do not respond.
--
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 07 May 2005 22:37:22 +0200 Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Work on further modules is in progress like:
I just wrote an etc-update workalike as an eclectic module. Mostly as an
experiment to see how we're going to handle interactive stuff... Sample
session at:
http://dev.gentoo
maillog: 09/05/2005-01:50:04(+0200): Lars Weiler types
> * Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/05/08 17:01 -0600]:
> > You could always borrow from the Germans and call it app-handy.
>
> Yeah! That's pure Denglisch :)
>
> And while we are on it, add all packages for presentations
> into an "a
On Sunday 08 May 2005 04:30 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 22:24, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility;
> > Gentoo adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable,
> > seeing as it's not a bug in KDE...
On Sunday 08 May 2005 04:46 pm, Alin Nastac wrote:
> R Hill wrote:
> > this doesn't include anything like VOIP of course. btw i think
> > "cellphone" is an Americanism. i worked for AT&T Wireless before they
> > were bought by Cingular and the term "cellphone" was discouraged for
> > that reason.
* Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/05/08 17:01 -0600]:
> You could always borrow from the Germans and call it app-handy.
Yeah! That's pure Denglisch :)
And while we are on it, add all packages for presentations
into an "app-beamer" group ;-)
Well, back on topic. Some of the suggested pac
On Sunday 08 May 2005 11:33 am, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> mysql-4.1 should use "utf8"
what does that have to do with this thread ?
file a bug (if one hasnt already been filed) and dont use the 'utf8' flag, use
the 'unicode' flag
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
As long as we are invited to be in the .org pavilion, yes.
Also in the works are plans for a day-long gentoo conference before or
after LWE (probably after, the Friday of that week would be a good fit).
Cheers,
-Corey
James Dio wrote:
CORRECTION: quite tired really... I meant during AUGUST not t
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:11 -0400, James Dio wrote:
> CORRECTION: quite tired really... I meant during AUGUST not the end of
> this month.. sorry
Yes, we're planning on it!
> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:06 -0400, James Dio wrote:
> > Will Gentoo be at Linux World expo in San Fransisco the end of
CORRECTION: quite tired really... I meant during AUGUST not the end of
this month.. sorry
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:06 -0400, James Dio wrote:
> Will Gentoo be at Linux World expo in San Fransisco the end of this
> month?
--
James Dio
www.psunit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #Normal EMAIL
[EMAI
Will Gentoo be at Linux World expo in San Fransisco the end of this
month?
--
James Dio
www.psunit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #Normal EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #Mailing list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 5/8/05, W.Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Oz, cellphone is only used in american movies, here they are called
> "mobile phones" (formal), "mobiles" (common usage) and "mob" when
> written (e.g., Mob: 0419...)
>
> There's also the upcoming "cell" processor architecture that may clash
>
In Oz, cellphone is only used in american movies, here they are called
"mobile phones" (formal), "mobiles" (common usage) and "mob" when
written (e.g., Mob: 0419...)
There's also the upcoming "cell" processor architecture that may clash
in the future.
How about app-mobphone or app-mobilephone or
R Hill wrote:
>
>
> this doesn't include anything like VOIP of course. btw i think
> "cellphone" is an Americanism. i worked for AT&T Wireless before they
> were bought by Cingular and the term "cellphone" was discouraged for
> that reason. maybe just app-phone?
hmm... I think it should includ
Hello Gentoo users & devs,
This is just to let everyone know there's going to be a group of devs
that will handle all your Project Utopia needs. Project Utopia is the
freedesktop.org push towards HAL & DBus basically. This will hopefully
help foser out who maintains everything under the sun.
We f
On Sunday 08 May 2005 22:24, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo
> adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing
> as it's not a bug in KDE...
Wrong, it's a KDE bug.
To be exact is KDE bug #101542.
The problem is t
On 5/8/05, Luke-Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:30, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > The only issue I heard about was problems with gcc3.4's -fvisibility stuff.
>
> Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo
> adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE
On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:30, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> The only issue I heard about was problems with gcc3.4's -fvisibility stuff.
Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo
adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing as
it's not a bug in
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 18:14 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> > > It has been masked since March 12.
>
> It was scheduled for removal for a long time, I really think that anyone
> interested in picking it up would have let me know by now.
> Do you want me to wait longer? (I take it this is about the mail
Alin Nastac wrote:
Hi folks,
I think we should make a new category called app-cellphone containing
the following packages:
net-dialup/gammu
net-dialup/gnokii
net-dialup/wammu
net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager
Yes, I know. It is a short list, but shouldn't be a category
representative for its
On Sunday 08 May 2005 19:05, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Hmm ... I'm still at gcc 3.3.5 but I'm running KDE 3.4 -- am I immune? I
> don't use "kasteroids" so I wouldn't have run into the obvious issue.
With gcc 3.3 you should be safe (as long as -fvisibility=hidden patch wasn't
ported to it).
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 18:05 +0100, John Mylchreest wrote:
> Although I am not interested in looking after this, is 4 hours and 20
> minutes notice enough to claim a new maintainer?
> > It has been masked since March 12.
It was scheduled for removal for a long time, I really think that anyone
inte
I realized I had added:
>=dev-libs/apr-0.9.6
>=dev-libs/apr-util-0.9.6
to /etc/portage/package.keywords, and that is why apr-1.1.1 and
apr-1.1.2 were installed, and not because they were required by
apache-2.0.54. I changed >= to ~ on those entries, unmerged them,
re-emerged apache-2.0.54 and s
Although I am not interested in looking after this, is 4 hours and 20
minutes notice enough to claim a new maintainer?
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 15:38 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> bmp-outlame causes instability with large playlists, and may seriously
> impair BMP's ability to play MP3 files.
> It has be
Hmm ... I'm still at gcc 3.3.5 but I'm running KDE 3.4 -- am I immune? I
don't use "kasteroids" so I wouldn't have run into the obvious issue.
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
>On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:16, LostSon wrote:
>
>
>> Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves
On Monday 09 May 2005 01:16, LostSon wrote:
> Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves into
> the stable tree realtively quickly. Have there been that many bugs and
> problems that it is slowing it down? I have been using it since it hit
> portage and have not had any prob
On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:16, LostSon wrote:
> Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves into
> the stable tree realtively quickly.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86898
The explanation is quite long, just look at that bug's comments and you'll
find why kde 3.4 can
Hey All
Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves into the
stable tree realtively quickly. Have there been that many bugs and problems
that it is slowing it down? I have been using it since it hit portage and
have not had any problems. So i am just curious this is in no
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>On Tue, 3 May 2005 14:21:58 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>| as many know, i dont use unicode, so i'm a bit ignorant of it ...
>|
>| is there a good reason for having both a global 'unicode' USE flag and
>| a bunch of local 'utf8' USE flags ? or should
On Sun, 8 May 2005 02:58:32 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Write the sucker up as a glep, issues and all for discussion, and you
| attack those involved as "trying to bypass the discussion".
Bah. It should have been written up as a GLEP with the initial feedback
already incorpor
bmp-outlame causes instability with large playlists, and may seriously
impair BMP's ability to play MP3 files.
It has been masked since March 12.
Should you want to save it, a patch is expected that makes it behave
correctly. If you're a dev, I expect you to maintain this package
afterwards.
If I
On Samstag 07 Mai 2005 22:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there any plans for supporting ebuilds for windows apps which use
> wine? I just installed wine (via the ebuild) to enable DVDShrink to
> be installed. Worked like a charm, but it would have been much cooler
> to 'emerge dvdshrink' and ha
* Alin Nastac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/05/08 16:17 +0300]:
> I think we should make a new category called app-cellphone containing
> the following packages:
Add
app-misc/scmxx
app-misc/gscmxx
app-misc/vmoconv
to the list. They are all for Siemens phones.
sys-fs/siefs may be another candidate, but
Hi folks,
I think we should make a new category called app-cellphone containing
the following packages:
net-dialup/gammu
net-dialup/gnokii
net-dialup/wammu
net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager
Yes, I know. It is a short list, but shouldn't be a category
representative for its content?
Alin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> You are incorrectly reading it. This is why the tag
> exists, so we don't need to duplicate the same information in 500 places.
Yeah tove informed me of this on irc.
Actually, herdstat was incorrectly reading it :) I tho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Brandt wrote:
> # svnadmin verify /var/svn/repos/
> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0x08064768 ***
> Aborted
Are you sure you have the latest versions of everything? When the big apache
unmask happened, my subversion brok
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 10:32:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans for supporting ebuilds for windows apps which use
> wine? I just installed wine (via the ebuild) to enable DVDShrink to
> be installed. Worked like a charm, but it would have been much cooler
> t
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:47:05AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> 6 Portage must disallow the creation of binary packages where all
>dependencies are not in the same PREFIX.
First level, second level... ?
I'd rather see the deps/prefix data slapped into the binpkg, and
tracked alongside, and ve
Just a friendly reminder, if you are placing files on the distfiles
mirrors that are not claimed by an ebuild in the tree, you need to
whitelist the files- just add the files to
/space/distfiles-whitelist-current on dev.gentoo.org , and the files
will be left alone for 6 months, or until they'r
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | If a dev doesn't have adequate knowledge for a particular package he
> | shouldn't be fscking with it in the first place. So there said package
> | can sit, having only the ability to install to / just like it always
> | has unt
45 matches
Mail list logo
