... which brings the German Conspiracy at 38. His nick is "frilled", but in
real life you'll call him "Giesen, Wolf Giesen". Shaken, not stirred. And
you'll call him that in the IT department of "Aschendorff Medien", publisher
of the "Westfälische Nachrichten", whatever that is.
You're probably al
On 25/07/06, Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:34:31PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Dunno about other folks, but I'd be very happy to see us return to the
> Resource Centre once more. I thought that it worked well as a venue,
> and that London is the right pl
yanc has not been updated for 2.5 years, has two open bugs[1][2], one of
which shows a crash on startup, and no one is really interested in
fixing either. The package is unmaintained upstream, though a new
rewrite called 'yanc42' has a pre-release that is over half a year old.
nvidia-settings may
* Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > build or unpack both nspr and nss and then look whats laying around
> > there. the nss sourcetree contains the nsprpub tree.
> >
>
> Yes, but we don't install it with the nss ebuild, as our build uses
> system nspr. I am sure you could check
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:16 +0100, Graham Murray wrote:
>> Is there an equivalent of (or replacement for) the command line
>> tethereal? This can give more useful information than tcpdump and can
>> be run in real-time on servers over an SSH connectio
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:04:17AM -0700, Joshua Jackson wrote:
> hmm, that returned nothing *hides the cash in my pocket* guess you
> didn't define the project, and your loss is my gain ;)
Ooops - well, just don't spend it all at once.
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:14:46PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>
>
> > Non gcc compilers have never been supported and probably never will be.
>
> If someone decides to work on that topic, IMHO the best approach
> would be providing an gcc-style fron
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:34:31PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
>> Dunno about other folks, but I'd be very happy to see us return to the
>> Resource Centre once more. I thought that it worked well as a venue,
>> and that Londo
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:34:31PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Dunno about other folks, but I'd be very happy to see us return to the
> Resource Centre once more. I thought that it worked well as a venue,
> and that London is the right place to hold the conference.
Resource Centre was fine, ma
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 17:34, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Someone needs to step up and volunteer to organise next year's conference.
Preferably someone in or near London (or place of venue) to sort it out. As I
live in a very big forest it kinda rules me out ;)
> Dunno about other folks, but I'd be
Lisa Seelye wrote:
> Is there any news on a 2007 event? This time, really, I promise I'll be
> in the country to attend!
No, and you won't hear anything from me. I won't be in the country.
Daniel
Someone needs to step up and volunteer to organise next year's conference.
Dunno about other folk
Lisa Seelye wrote:
Is there any news on a 2007 event? This time, really, I promise I'll be
in the country to attend!
No, and you won't hear anything from me. I won't be in the country.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:32 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I was going to send this to the trustees, but I realised that they might
> be changing around soon, so I'll send it here instead:
>
>
> Dear future trustees,
>
> As you might be aware, we recently held a users-and-developers meeting
> in
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:16 +0100, Graham Murray wrote:
> Is there an equivalent of (or replacement for) the command line
> tethereal? This can give more useful information than tcpdump and can
> be run in real-time on servers over an SSH connection.
tshark... =]
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engi
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 01:16, Graham Murray wrote:
> Is there an equivalent of (or replacement for) the command line
> tethereal?
tshark
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Crypto/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpj1Ot1BfcHs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ethereal, as far as anyone can tell, is no longer being developed[3] as all
> the core developers have moved to Wireshark[4].
>
> To make this transition as painless as possible, a package move has been
> setup
> so Ethereal users should automatically
As you probably read yesterday in GWN[1], Ethereal is being removed due to
security vulnerabilities[2] and replaced with its successor, Wireshark.
Ethereal, as far as anyone can tell, is no longer being developed[3] as all
the core developers have moved to Wireshark[4].
To make this transition
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 12:46 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 17:39 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > while emerging seamonkey I've seen something strange on nspr
> > > and nss: these packages are both i
* Kevin F. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Where a package does run-time detection, there's no need for any
> conditional compilation as they build for everything anyway, so such
> packages wouldn't use mmx/sse/sse2 etc USE flags anyway.
Well, there are still valid reasons: if you *know* you
* Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Non gcc compilers have never been supported and probably never will be.
If someone decides to work on that topic, IMHO the best approach
would be providing an gcc-style frontend, so we actually get
an drop-in-replacement (at least from the command line
* Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > echo | $(tc-getCC) ${CFLAGS} -dM -E - 2>/dev/null
>
> > Thoughts? Comments?
>
> How will you handle non-gcc compilers?
Maybe it goes out of gentoo's scope, but I'm developing an
universal toolchain wra
* Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thursday 06 July 2006 13:00, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > The one advantage of using USE flags for this is that the support can
> > be controlled very easily on a per-package basis. CFLAGS is much more
> > of a system-wide setting.
> There
* Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 17:39 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > while emerging seamonkey I've seen something strange on nspr
> > and nss: these packages are both imported by seamonkey, but
> > it seems that nss contains nspr. Do we
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 17:39 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> while emerging seamonkey I've seen something strange on nspr
> and nss: these packages are both imported by seamonkey, but
> it seems that nss contains nspr. Do we have some duplicates here ?
>
Can you elaborate (maybe wit
I'm sending the last rites before the p.mask this time because I'm currently
occupied in the whole KDE commit so I'd rather not to mix stuff up.
Later today media-libs/tunepimp is going to be masked, the musicbrainz useflag
dropped, and removed in 30 days.
The reason is a security issue (bug #1
25 matches
Mail list logo