Some time ago the development version of portage used to source the
ebuild only once. I very much liked this and in the process fixed some
ebuilds like you described it.
Sadly this feature was removed from portage again - nice to see it
coming up again. Please fix or point out ebuilds that are
Clearly you are more concerned about getting Paludis ready. spb has other
priorities, fair enough, but this is something that seems fairly important
for gentoo as a whole.
In process terms, I can't understand why the team working on it isn't a
pkgcore dev (eg marienz if you can't communica
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:48:49 -0700 "Daniel Robbins"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 2/21/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Are you insane? What on earth could Jakub possibly contribute? If
| > you want a rough indication of Jakub's level of ebuild
| > understanding, take a look at
On 2/21/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you insane? What on earth could Jakub possibly contribute? If you
want a rough indication of Jakub's level of ebuild understanding, take
a look at bug 160328.
Is there any process in place to ban people from the gentoo-dev
mailing list
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:04:37 + Steve Long
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > I'm saying that until there is an independent implementation, the
| > specification is worthless and will contain huge numbers of errors.
|
| Seriously? Without an implementation, your spec of what should happen
| will ha
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | Are you really saying that you won't be releasing this information
> | until such time as *Paludis* meets it, even though portage/pkgcore
> | may not? Isn't the *point* of this spec to try to bring everyone on
> | the same page?
>
> I'm saying that until there is an inde
Brian Harring wrote:
> Offhand, if the council (majority, no offense meant but not just
> one council member who is also a paludis dev) is happy with the state
> of things and timelines, then I'll gladly retract the request.
>
Is this the case; are the majority of the council happy?
--
gentoo-de
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Please welcome Richard to our ranks, or accuse him of being an evil
> cabalist (he works on Paludis, particularly maintaining its Ruby
> bindings), as you see fit.
Welcome, Richard. Excellent choice of programming language! :)
--
David Shakaryan
GnuPG Public Key: 0x4B8FE
On Wednesday 21 February 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> A number of ebuilds do things like this:
> inherit foo
> VAR="${FOO_VAR}"
> where foo.eclass looks like this:
> foo_pkg_setup()
> export FOO_VAR=baz
>
> Is this something that has to work (at the expense of never allowing
>
Ciaran,
It looks like a fairly trivial thing to fix in ebuilds.
I think the problem you may be having is that people don't have any
incentive to make short-term changes to their ebuilds just so you can
get Paludis to work with them. It needs to be part of a larger
interoperability plan that incl
A number of ebuilds do things like this:
inherit foo
VAR="${FOO_VAR}"
src_compile()
{
emake blah=${VAR}
}
where foo.eclass looks like this:
foo_pkg_setup()
{
export FOO_VAR=baz
}
and where VAR is usually one of the KV variables from linux-info.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:53:47 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Danny van Dyk napsal(a):
> | > What about making custom-cflags default in the base profile?
> |
> | Uhm? Maybe re-read the description of the flags? It's unsupported and
> | breaks stuff, that's wh
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Everybody say hi, or alternative greetings of your choice, to our new
Yet another minion^Wfellow developer joining the horde^Wour circle...
Ehm, welcome, thank you for joining, I hope we could have lots of fun,
if you can stand Ciaran in his bad moments you could stand th
Welcome rbrown!!!
--
Alexander Færøy
Bugday Lead
Alpha/IA64/MIPS Architecture Teams
User Relations, Quality Assurance
pgp0TphwDE5Yr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> pcheck -r $PORTDIR '*' -c Manifest2Transition
I am trying to finish the transition:
- cvs up a category
- try(some of them are unfetchable) to fix all pkgs that pcheck reports
Hope it goes smoothly.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007 20:10 schrieb Stephen Bennett:
> Please welcome Richard to our ranks, or accuse him of being an evil
> cabalist (he works on Paludis, particularly maintaining its Ruby
> bindings), as you see fit.
Welcome aboard Richard!
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ge
Everybody say hi, or alternative greetings of your choice, to our new
recruit, Richard Brown, who will be helping with various QA-related
projects and possibly attempting to kick some life into the Ruby herd.
He, in his own words, works and lives in Hampshire in the UK, doing a
mix of website deve
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:40:43 -0800
Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are people using old versions of portage? when flameeyes worked on
> this, he did all but *4*(not 4%) so I'm wondering how it creeped back up.
Most likely he didn't detect all packages (haven't seen his script).
Marius
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Marius Mauch wrote:
Updated versions of the list will be available at
dev.gentoo.org/~genone/reports/mf2
Please provide complete URLs. It's not so hard to type an extra 7
characters :)
Also your mail client does not appear
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:53:47 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Danny van Dyk napsal(a):
| > What about making custom-cflags default in the base profile?
|
| Uhm? Maybe re-read the description of the flags? It's unsupported and
| breaks stuff, that's why the use flag exists...
And not u
Danny van Dyk napsal(a):
> What about making custom-cflags default in the base profile?
Uhm? Maybe re-read the description of the flags? It's unsupported and
breaks stuff, that's why the use flag exists...
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.p
Mike Doty wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
>> While Diego did an awesome job with converting many packages to
>> Manifest2 there are still about 400 packages that aren't converted
>> yet. If you maintain any package in the attached list please update it
>> to use Manifest2.
>>
>> To update a package ma
How about we just leave them as local use flags and move on? global
vs. local is more then just about number of packages using the flag.
It has more to do with, "Is this flag globally useful and relevant."
So far, I haven't seen a recently suggest local use flag that cries out
to be made global.
Am Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007 18:25 schrieb Timothy Redaelli:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:32:56 +0100 Timothy Redaelli
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > | What do you think about custom-cflags global USE?
> >
> > I think it encourages policy violations.
> >
> > http
Marius Mauch wrote:
While Diego did an awesome job with converting many packages to Manifest2 there
are still about 400 packages that aren't converted yet. If you maintain any
package in the attached list please update it to use Manifest2.
To update a package make sure that you're using portag
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:32:56 +0100 Timothy Redaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | What do you think about custom-cflags global USE?
>
> I think it encourages policy violations.
>
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/user-environment/index.html
I know the pol
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:32:56 +0100 Timothy Redaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| What do you think about custom-cflags global USE?
I think it encourages policy violations.
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/user-environment/index.html
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:31:44 +0100 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Now, I think we could wait even a bit more, but there is much interest
| in seeing it complete so is natural that more people are willing to
| help speeding up at least the first release.
The question is not whether they
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:28:51 +0100 "Denis Dupeyron"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| You forgot to mention that the "small group" is either a subset of the
| interested parties or is commissioned by them. Which doesn't appear to
| be the case here.
Sure it is.
| > Because there are a lot of people wi
Bruno Roggeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 21 Feb
2007 14:21:23 +0100:
> I filed bug 165561 [1] to ask for the musicbrainz useflag to be made
> global, and in reply I was asked to have it discussed here, so here it
> goes. According to use.local.desc, the
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:28:51 +0100
"Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You forgot to mention that the "small group" is either a subset of the
> interested parties or is commissioned by them. Which doesn't appear to
> be the case here.
Given that people wouldn't be working on it if they
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:16:27PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> While Diego did an awesome job with converting many packages to
> Manifest2 there are still about 400 packages that aren't converted
> yet. If you maintain any package in the attached list please update
> it to use Manifest2.
>
> T
While Diego did an awesome job with converting many packages to Manifest2 there
are still about 400 packages that aren't converted yet. If you maintain any
package in the attached list please update it to use Manifest2.
To update a package make sure that you're using portage-2.1.2-r9 or later, r
Hello list,
I filed bug 165561 [1] to ask for the musicbrainz useflag to be made global,
and in reply I was asked to have it discussed here, so here it goes.
According to use.local.desc, the useflag is used in 4 different ebuilds for
the same purpose :
app-cdr/k3b, media-sound/amarok, media-soun
What do you think about custom-cflags global USE?
app-emulation/xen-tools:custom-cflags - Use CFLAGS from /etc/make.conf
rather than the default Xen CFLAGS (not supported)
app-emulation/xen:custom-cflags - Use CFLAGS from /etc/make.conf rather
than the default Xen CFLAGS (not supported)
games-emul
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:10:49AM +, George Prowse wrote:
> Bryan Østergaard wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:46:32AM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
> >>
> >>>It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker
> >>>archs clutteri
36 matches
Mail list logo