В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
В Срд, 16/01/2008 в 06:09 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет:
if two packages provide the same binary and they blocked each other, a move
would be doable as it would be impossible for the two packages to be
installed simultaneously. but as Petteri points out, libdca/libdts dont
provide the same
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
Package moves don't work very well if
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Срд, 16/01/2008 в 06:09 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет:
if two packages provide the same binary and they blocked each other, a
move would be doable as it would be impossible for the two packages to be
installed simultaneously. but as Petteri
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13 Jan 2008)
# Masked for removal in about 60 days.
# libdts is replaced by libdca.
media-libs/libdts
=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20051216
=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p2006*
=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070129
=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070325
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:28:36 +0300
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
В Вск, 13/01/2008 в 11:06 +0200, Samuli Suominen пишет:
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13 Jan 2008)
# Masked for removal in about 60 days.
# libdts is replaced by libdca.
media-libs/libdts
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to
another.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to
another.
unless they had a block in place ...
-mike
signature.asc
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to
another.
unless they had a block in place ...
10 matches
Mail list logo