On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 06:51:51PM +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
> Luckily the error messages are informative enough... but let's say that
> a word of caution in the emerge message would have been welcomed.
There is a warning printed if you emerged without the berkdb flag when
you upgraded from
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ?
Yes, it should be OK as long as you run etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar
after the upgrade. Postfix daemons now live under /usr/libexec/postfix
(not under /usr/lib{,64)
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 01:05, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
>> wrote:
>>> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemm
>> I can't seem to get gcc-4.5.3-r1 to compile. I tried twice and it
>> failed at the exact same point both times. The build log doesn't
>> mention a segfault. Does anyone know how to fix this? I was able to
>> compile gcc-4.3.3 a short while ago.
>>
>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.5.3-r1/w
On Feb 7, 2012 9:46 AM, "walt" wrote:
>
> I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired
> of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The chrome-binary ebuild
> was removed a while ago, I'm guessing because of library version
> conflicts, but I dunno for sure.
>
> Anyway, I w
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 February 2012 00:23:43 Dale wrote:
>
>
>
>> Note: Use ! to comment instead of #. Weird. Command to find closest
>
>> servers:
>
>
>
> You don't have to. Chrony's convention is to use # for its own comments
> and ! for assignments you want to comment ou
On 6 February 2012 21:42, walt wrote:
> I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired
> of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The chrome-binary ebuild
> was removed a while ago, I'm guessing because of library version
> conflicts, but I dunno for sure.
>
> Anyway, I wan
I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired
of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The chrome-binary ebuild
was removed a while ago, I'm guessing because of library version
conflicts, but I dunno for sure.
Anyway, I wanted to try a recent version of chrome without spe
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 00:23:43 Dale wrote:
> Note: Use ! to comment instead of #. Weird. Command to find closest
> servers:
You don't have to. Chrony's convention is to use # for its own comments and
! for assignments you want to comment out. Just a convention though. Use
either at wi
On Feb 6, 2012 7:00 PM, wrote:
>
> Michael Mol [12-02-06 19:56]:
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:39 PM, wrote:
> > > Michael Mol [12-02-06 19:20]:
> > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot
process.
>
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> As I wrote the kernel is configured
>
>
> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=y
> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE="rtc0"
>
> so there is no module, the functionality is compiled into the kernel.
>
> And as I wrote I am using the ntp_client to set the system time via
Florian Philipp [12-02-06 20:00]:
> Am 06.02.2012 19:39, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> > Michael Mol [12-02-06 19:20]:
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
> >>> Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwcloc
Michael Mol [12-02-06 19:56]:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:39 PM, wrote:
> > Michael Mol [12-02-06 19:20]:
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
> >> > Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
V Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:33:21 -0800
Grant napsáno:
> I'm trying to compile GCC on a remote system with 192MB RAM. It's
> completed successfully before but now it uses up all RAM. The compile
> doesn't stop but it must be thrashing. I have MAKEOPTS="-j1" in
> /etc/make.conf. Am I jeopardizing my
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Grant wrote:
> I'm trying to compile GCC on a remote system with 192MB RAM. It's
> completed successfully before but now it uses up all RAM. The compile
> doesn't stop but it must be thrashing. I have MAKEOPTS="-j1" in
> /etc/make.conf. Am I jeopardizing my HD b
On 06/02/12 23:33, Grant wrote:
I'm trying to compile GCC on a remote system with 192MB RAM. It's
completed successfully before but now it uses up all RAM. The compile
doesn't stop but it must be thrashing. I have MAKEOPTS="-j1" in
/etc/make.conf. Am I jeopardizing my HD by letting it swap on
I'm trying to compile GCC on a remote system with 192MB RAM. It's
completed successfully before but now it uses up all RAM. The compile
doesn't stop but it must be thrashing. I have MAKEOPTS="-j1" in
/etc/make.conf. Am I jeopardizing my HD by letting it swap on the
compile right now? I've orde
Am 06.02.2012 19:39, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Michael Mol [12-02-06 19:20]:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
>>> Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
>>>
>>># Set CLOCK to "UTC" if your
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Dale wrote:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
>> Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
>>
>> # Set CLOCK to "UTC" if your Hardware Clock is set to UTC (also known as
>> # Greenw
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:39 PM, wrote:
> Michael Mol [12-02-06 19:20]:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
>> > Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
>> >
>> > # Set CLOCK to "UTC" if your Har
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
> Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
>
> # Set CLOCK to "UTC" if your Hardware Clock is set to UTC (also known as
> # Greenwich Mean Time). If that clock is set to the local t
Michael Mol [12-02-06 19:20]:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
> > Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
> >
> > # Set CLOCK to "UTC" if your Hardware Clock is set to UTC (also known as
> > #
Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:05:38 schrieb Paul Hartman:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schri
>> I was just going over the Baselayout and OpenRC Migration Guide:
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml
>>
>> and I'm not sure how to make sure my /etc/mtab is set up according to
>> the instructions:
>>
>> "Previously, the initial rootfs entry was removed from /etc/mtab, and
>>
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
> Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
>
> # Set CLOCK to "UTC" if your Hardware Clock is set to UTC (also known as
> # Greenwich Mean Time). If that clock is set to
> At first glance firefox uses the arithmetic pointer and Wno-pointer-arith
> lifts warnings or errors when used.
> This is what gcc says : error: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic
>
> What it gives without this flag and Is there a particular reason for using
> this one ?
I'm having trou
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
> wrote:
>> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> >> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Hel
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
> wrote:
>> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> >> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helm
Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> >> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> beware of installing postfix-2.
> BTW postfix 2.9.0 also fails to emerge if USE="vda" because it tried
> to apply the patch for 2.8.5. (patch for 2.9.0 has not yet been
> released)
And it also fails to start if have maps in hash format and emerge with
USE=-berkdb.
Luckily the error messages are informative enough... but let's s
Hi,
to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
# Set CLOCK to "UTC" if your Hardware Clock is set to UTC (also known as
# Greenwich Mean Time). If that clock is set to the local time, then
# set CLOCK to "local". N
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
>>> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have
Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>> Hi,
>>
>> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
>> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
>> installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
>
>
> postfix 2.9.0 wor
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
>> On Monday 06 Feb 2012 05:47:53 Walter Dnes wrote:
>>> Heads up... the network ethernet device drivers aettings are laid out
>>> differently in 3.2.1, and "make oldconfig" misses a few items. The new
>>> layout route goes like so...
>>
Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> Hi,
>
> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
> installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
postfix 2.9.0 works fine for me.
But I also run cfg-update after the update and
Am 06.02.2012 16:42, schrieb Paul Hartman:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Helmut Jarausch
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
>> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
>> installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
>
> Maybe a side-effect of bug 40191
Hello,
Has anyone built or installed SE-android onto a Sumsung Nexus
(or similar) cell phone, using a Gentoo development environment?
http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/SE-Android-publicly-released/?kc=LNXDEVNL012612
http://selinuxproject.org/page/SEAndroid
curiously,
James
Mick wrote:
> On Monday 06 Feb 2012 05:47:53 Walter Dnes wrote:
>> Heads up... the network ethernet device drivers aettings are laid out
>> differently in 3.2.1, and "make oldconfig" misses a few items. The new
>> layout route goes like so...
>>
>> Device Drivers --->
>> [*] Network device supp
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
> installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
Maybe a side-effect of bug 401911
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401911
BTW po
At first glance firefox uses the arithmetic pointer and Wno-pointer-arith
lifts warnings or errors when used.
This is what gcc says : error: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic
What it gives without this flag and Is there a particular reason for using this
one ?
Regards,
On Mon, Feb 6,
Am 06.02.2012 05:56, schrieb Michael Mol:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Grant wrote:
>> Does anyone have any ideas on this? I just completed an emerge -e
>> world so I don't think anything needs to be re-emerged. Everything
>> compiles fine except for gcc-4.5.3-r1 (I'm on gcc-4.3.4) and
>> f
I was just compiling my kernel using genkernel, and it seems genkernel
3.4.24 is broken. I have specified INSTALL=YES in /etc/genkernel.conf; the
installtion does not happen, instead awk throws an error saying failed to
read /var/tmp/genkernel//grub.map no such file or
directory.
--
Nilesh Govindr
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:23:40 +0100, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> If you run /etc/init.d/ zap it resets the status to
> stopped. I don't know, if postfix has that option though.
Doesn't work in this case. Simply killing the postfix daemons manually
however does. The problem can also simply be f
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:03:19 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2012-02-05 3:06 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > In your shoes what I would be doing now is backup your entire mysql
> > install (everything listed in "equery files mysql"), delete the
> > package (emerge -C) and remerge mysql.
> >
> > Then ch
On 2012-02-05 3:06 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
In your shoes what I would be doing now is backup your entire mysql
install (everything listed in "equery files mysql"), delete the package
(emerge -C) and remerge mysql.
Then check if starting and stopping works correctly. I suspect you'll
find it wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.02.2012 12:06, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0 When started it tries to access
> /usr/lib/postfix but files have been installed into
> /usr/libexec/postfix
>
> And after re-emerging postfix-2.8.8 I couldn't d
Hi,
beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
And after re-emerging postfix-2.8.8 I couldn't do
/etc/init.d/postfix restart
since openrc was thinking it's still running.
Since it was urgent I rebo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.02.2012 10:46, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 06 Feb 2012 05:47:53 Walter Dnes wrote:
>> Heads up... the network ethernet device drivers aettings are laid
>> out differently in 3.2.1, and "make oldconfig" misses a few
>> items. The new layout route goe
On Monday 06 Feb 2012 05:47:53 Walter Dnes wrote:
> Heads up... the network ethernet device drivers aettings are laid out
> differently in 3.2.1, and "make oldconfig" misses a few items. The new
> layout route goes like so...
>
> Device Drivers --->
> [*] Network device support --->
> [*] E
On Monday 06 Feb 2012 05:10:45 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 02/05/2012 03:01 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > You cannot trust the commented examples in rc.conf to be the defaults.
> > I reckon they are just that - typical examples.
> >
> > If you search through rc.conf for the word "default" you find
50 matches
Mail list logo
