Hello,
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alec Ten Harmsel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, at 08:04, Michael wrote:
> > > I have not used Zoom, but the interwebs are screaming about the fly-by
> > > malware
> > > silent installations that come with it. I don't know if this applies to
>
Hello,
> > I now use pdfjoin from app-text/pdfjam.
>
> The packages: pdfjoin and pdfunite
>
> They will combine pdf documents (I use them as well) but they will not
> overlap two pages together.
Well, with some trick, pdfjam can actually overlap two pages together :
https://stackoverflow.com/q
Hello,
> That is not what I (we) need.
> pdfunite - will join several PDF file into one (this is not what I want).
>
> I need to "overlap" two PDF file, one on top of another, it is like
> watermarking. I only do it once a year when I print a tax form/slips.
Maybe a Python script using pyPdf ?
Hello,
* Helmut Jarausch [30.10.2017. @11:59:09 -]:
> Hi,
> when trying to re-emerge libreoffice I get the strange message
> No. You make ME a sandwich.
> Has anybody seen this before?
Really ?! I have never seen this message, but it remindsme that:
https://xkcd.com/149/
Maybe the message
Hello,
* Matthew Marchese [17.10.2017. @02:30:55 -0700]:
> On 10/12/2017 08:55 AM, Lucas Ramage wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have been having an issue with mutt not displaying encrypted attachments.
> >
> > My configs are on github,
> >
> > https://github.com/lramage94/dotfiles/{.mutt,.gnup
Hello,
> I was looking at this rotating backup script
>
> source:
> https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/34970-how-to-create-rotating-backups-of-files
>
> --backup script
> BACKUPDIR=`date +%A`
> OPTS="--force --ignore-errors --delete-excluded --exclude-from=$EXCLUDES
Hello,
> I am looking for an alternative for shutter, which has been
> removed from portage which is not shutterbug (see me initial posting).
>
> So neither shutter nor shutterbug is an alternative to shutter.
>
> What else can I use instead.
I am using media-gfx/scrot, a very simple screenshot
On 10/13/2015 04:53 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated to gnupg-2.1.9 from 2.0.x on both my desktop and laptop
> and now I have big problems.
>
> 1. gpgme is now broken.
>
> Gpgme consumers (e.g. sylpheed, mcabber) can verify, encrypt and
> decrypt messages, but can't sign them.
* Bill Kenworthy [28.06.2015. @05:45:37 +0800]:
> Hi all,
> over the years when I need a web-server I have just used Apache. I am
> in the process of consolidating my separate services VM's for various
> things into LXC containers and am looking for something a bit lighter if
> its worthwh
> > In my system :
> >
> > root:518 ~> eix ^mutt$
> > [I] mail-client/mutt
> > Available versions: 1.5.22-r3 1.5.23-r5 ~1.5.23-r6 {berkdb crypt debug
> > doc gdbm gnutls gpg idn imap kerberos mbox nls nntp pop qdbm sasl selinux
> > sidebar slang smime smtp ssl tokyocabinet}
> > Install
* Stefan G. Weichinger [23.01.2015. @13:57:02 +0100]:
> On 23.01.2015 12:06, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
>
> > I suppose you're referring to 'written' chat.
>
> Yes!
>
> > At work, on a local
> > network, I'm using pidgin client with SIPE plugin
> > (x11-plugins/pidgin-sipe ). Works fine to cha
Hi list,
I was wondering how it works for binary packages when they are compiled:
Are all binary packages compiled on Gentoo infrastructure after a source
upload from the maintainer, or are there any binary packages compiled on
maintainers computers and then uploaded on Gentoo infra?
In fact, we
* Canek Peláez Valdés [13.09.2013. @00:16:51 -0500]:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Joseph wrote:
> > On 09/13/13 00:04, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Joseph wrote:
> >>>
* hasufell [21.08.2013. @16:48:10 +0200]:
> On 08/20/2013 05:12 PM, Randy Westlund wrote:
> > I've heard several people mention jitsi, but was surprised to find that
> > it's not in the portage tree.
> >
>
> Jitsi is written in java and thus by design buggy, bloated and hard to
> maintain.
Wh
* the [21.08.2013. @09:35:09 +0400]:
> On 08/20/13 19:12, Randy Westlund wrote:
> > For a multitude of reasons, I'd like to get rid of skype. I've
> > heard several people mention jitsi, but was surprised to find that
> > it's not in the portage tree.
> >
> > Is jitsi being actively maintained
*> James [04.07.2013. @19:38:00 +]:
> Hello,
>
> Not sure how many folks are using 3D printers yet
> via Gentoo. If so your shared experiences are of keen
> interest to me.
>
> I did find these excellent resources [1].
>
> [1] http://www.makerbot.com/support/guides/design/
> [2] http://ww
> Do you really want to recompile LibreOffice just because a
> linguas_klingon USE flag has been added?
Well… I think that linguas_klingon would exactly the use flag which would make
recompile LibreOffice ^^
JC
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Alan Mackenzie [24.01.2013. @11:25:45 +]:
> Hi, Gentoo!
>
> A couple of days ago, I merged firefox-17.0.2 and ran revdep-rebuild -p.
> It said, strangely, that some firefox libraries needed rebuilding.
>
> I've just let revdep-rebuild rebuild firefox. I run revdep-rebuild -p
> again, and
* Grant [14.02.2012. @12:41:25 -0800]:
> Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
> portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
>
> - Grant
Hi,
You may want to try Luakit which is light and highly configurable by Lua
scripts. I think it is a gread br
* jorge espada [19.12.2011. @10:41:43 -0300]:
> Hi, I'm thinking of giving a try to Xmonad X11/window manager... anyone has
> experience or recommendations.
> Should I use kde or gnome as base.. or relay 100% on xmonad
> Thanks
>
> Jorge E. Espada
Hi,
I have been using Xmonad for about two yea
* Willie Wong [11.12.2010. @12:13:27 -0500]:
> Thanks for the work! If you want the patch merged into the gentoo
> patch set, I think you should file a bug on bugs.gentoo.org, if you
> haven't already done so.
You are right, I have just filled a bug here (my first one \\o \o/ o//):
http://bugs.
* Jean-Christophe Bach [08.12.2010. @00:14:03 +0100]:
> * walt [07.12.2010. @11:44:18 -0800]:
>
> > On 12/06/2010 12:07 PM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
> > > * walt [06.12.2010. @11:44:12 -0800]:
> > >
> > >> On 12/06/2010 11:11 AM,
* walt [07.12.2010. @11:44:18 -0800]:
> On 12/06/2010 12:07 PM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
> > * walt [06.12.2010. @11:44:12 -0800]:
> >
> >> On 12/06/2010 11:11 AM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I am using
* walt [06.12.2010. @11:44:12 -0800]:
> On 12/06/2010 11:11 AM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am using mutt and gnupg for my mail and I do not understand something:
> > when I sign and send an email, my gpg signature appears as an attached
> >
Hi all,
I am using mutt and gnupg for my mail and I do not understand something:
when I sign and send an email, my gpg signature appears as an attached
"noname" file while friends have an attached "signature.asc" file. How
do you do to change this not so important issue? Is it mutt or gnupg
relate
Hi,
* fe...@crowfix.com [24.09.2010. @21:11:46 -0700]:
> I have recently discovered Dropbox as an interesting thing to
> experiment with, not without its drawbacks, but interesting.
>
> I have it running on a work Mac laptop and an Android phone, and it is
> another interesting idea to put it on
26 matches
Mail list logo
