Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Thursday 31 July 2008,
13:27:24
> Hi,
>
> am I doing something wrong?
>
> Whenever I emerge a new sys-libs/timezone-data
> I need to do afterwards
>
> rm -f /etc/localtime
> ln -s /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Berlin /etc/localtime
>
> (This is with baselayout-2
"Kevin O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Thursday 24 July 2008, 03:26:26
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2008, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> >> I run gentoo x86 stable, so that I usually avoid this sort of thing.
> >>
> >> Th
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Wednesday 23 July 2008, 19:43:16
> Hello,
>
> I currently use Korganizer. I was wondering if there is a way to
> enhance the calender with know public holidays. For example,
> say I wan to get the Holidays for the USA, Canada and Jamaica
> onto my KOrganizer?
KOrganiz
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Wednesday 23 July 2008, 19:09:45
> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > I run gentoo x86 stable, so that I usually avoid this sort of thing.
> >
> > This kernel, however, looks balky to me, because it's reporting
> > warnings and other oddities during compilation. I don't like war
kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Friday 27 June 2008, 02:28:21
> Here's a reference to the interesting meet-in-the-middle attack which
> reduced 3DES key space down to 112 bits from 192.
3DES always had an effective key size of 112 bits, because it uses the
original DES algorithm applied in the fol
7v5w7go9ub0o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Friday 27 June 2008, 05:41:15
> Chris Walters wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Sorry if this subject has been hashed and rehashed again, but I was
> > wondering
> > which Gentoo partition encryption scheme is considered the b
Steven Lembark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Thursday 26 June 2008, 23:52:17
> > I submit that brute forcing an AES key of reasonably length is
> > currently impossible in an amount of time that would matter to the
> > human race.
>
> On average yes.
>
> As already pointed out, however, there is nothi
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Thursday 26 June 2008, 10:54:43
> The calculation is quite simple - measure how quickly a specific
> computer can match keys. Divide this into the size of the keyspace. The
> average time to brute force a key is half that value. AFAIK this still
> averages out a
"Jason Rivard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Wednesday 25 June 2008, 23:53:23
> > > The only thing that cryptography attempts to do is reduce the
> > > **probability** of cracking the key and gaining access to the data as
> > > low as possible.
> >
> > No news. That's, why cryptology defines "security" n
Chris Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Wednesday 25 June 2008, 22:25:18
> Are you a cryptology expert?
Are you then?
> The only thing that cryptography attempts to do is reduce the
> **probability** of cracking the key and gaining access to the data as low
> as possible.
No news. That's, why
Chris Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Wednesday 25 June 2008, 17:14:20
> | Rumor has it that the three-letter agencies (CIA, KGB, M.A.V.O. [2],
> | etc) can break those algorithms relatively easy. On the other hand even
> | weaker algorithms can protect your data against laptop thieves.
You had be
Chris Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Monday 23 June 2008, 17:46:23
> Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> | Am Montag, 23. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Chris Walters:
>
> [snip]
>
> |> 3. Number and type of ciphers available
> |
> | Maybe I'm wrong, but the name loop-aes tells this, right? With LUKS,
> | one can use (
12 matches
Mail list logo
