On Saturday 25 February 2006 07:37, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > that is the only change I remember at the moment (and which did not went
> > into the wiki).
>
> Not true anymore :) I just added "your" changes to the wiki.
'your' is correct, because I 'stole' it from t
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> that is the only change I remember at the moment (and which did not went into
> the wiki).
Not true anymore :) I just added "your" changes to the wiki.
Thanks a lot,
Alexander Skwar
--
Yow! I'm having a quadrophonic sensation of two winos alone in a steel mill!
On Friday 24 February 2006 15:37, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Friday 24 February 2006 07:00, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> >> > If I got it right here's the link for those interested:
> >> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Friday 24 February 2006 07:00, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Alexander Kirillov wrote:
>> > If I got it right here's the link for those interested:
>> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb
>>
>> Does this work with recent portage releases?
>>
> it stop
On Friday 24 February 2006 07:00, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> > If I got it right here's the link for those interested:
> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb
>
> Does this work with recent portage releases?
>
it stopped some weeks ago - but in the gentoo
Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> If I got it right here's the link for those interested:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb
Does this work with recent portage releases?
Alexander Skwar
--
"My pan plays down an unprecedented amount of our national debt."
George W. Bush
February 27
On Friday 24 February 2006 00:39, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> >>BSD ports system may not be as complex as Gentoo's
> >>and needs more attention to maintain port dependencies
> >>but this "abuse of make" IS REAL FAST.
> >
> > portage is REAL SLOW.
> > So you should install/use cdb, which makes the w
BSD ports system may not be as complex as Gentoo's
and needs more attention to maintain port dependencies
but this "abuse of make" IS REAL FAST.
portage is REAL SLOW.
So you should install/use cdb, which makes the whole rsync/update process REAL
FAST.
If you sync regularly it's usually withi
On Thursday 23 February 2006 11:26, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> >>I already think Gentoo base system requirements are a bit heavy just
> >> having python in there. (I'm trying to run gentoo on my WRT54G 1.1;
> >> storage over nfs/nbd) It would be completely over-the-top to require
> >> Modula 3 s
I already think Gentoo base system requirements are a bit heavy just having
python in there. (I'm trying to run gentoo on my WRT54G 1.1; storage over
nfs/nbd) It would be completely over-the-top to require Modula 3 support
as well.
Just tried cvsup on a FreeBSD box (in vmware) and it totally
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 05:24 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 04:07, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about '[gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync':
> > Anyone wants to comment??
>
> I already think Gentoo base s
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 18:38, Aniruddha Shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync':
> That I can live with. It's the updating portage cache - especially the
> long wait at 50% that drags.
Go ~ for portage, I don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> That said, it would be nice to do away with the "building file list..."
> delay we have with rsync.
That I can live with. It's the updating portage cache - especially the
long wait at 50% that drags.
K
-BEGIN PG
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 04:07, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync':
> Anyone wants to comment??
I already think Gentoo base system requirements are a bit heavy just having
python in there. (I'm trying to run gen
On 2/21/06, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> * Local changes will be preserved if you want them to, just like
> anoncvs. Anyone who's ever had their package.mask file
> overwritten by an emerge rsync will appreciate this feature.
>
> [SNIP]
If you don't wan
Anyone knows?? A google search found interesting details on cvsup.
(there's even the purported 50x increase in speed on a 56K
link)http://www.cvsup.org/cvsup6.html
Then I also found a link in one of GWM (Gentoo Weeky News all the way
back in 2002 -
http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20021223-newsle
16 matches
Mail list logo