On 10/29/2016 04:59 AM, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
> Have a look at renamexm from sys-apps/rename (it's actually called
> rename
> but for Gentoo is was renamed to avoid a collision). It has a lot more
> options than rename and defaults to prompting you if you try to
> rename to
>
>
> Have a look at renamexm from sys-apps/rename (it's actually called rename
> but for Gentoo is was renamed to avoid a collision). It has a lot more
> options than rename and defaults to prompting you if you try to rename to
> an existing file.
I use vidir from sys-apps/moreutils.
All the power
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:18:36 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > I know it is a smart-arse answer, but it's better for sore eyes
> > if you rename your files to unique-width numbers.
> > $ for f in image* ; do mv $f image_`printf %03d ${f##image}` ; done
> > This works for zsh and may need slight chan
161020 Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> On Thursday, 20. Oct 2016, 08:25:22 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>> Using Gwenview with KDE 4, the thumbnail view showed images
>> in correct numerical order : image1 image2 ... image9 image10 ... .
>> With KDE 5, it's gone stupid : image1 image11 image12 ...
>> image 1
>All digits are taken into account, but not as digits. This is a lexical
>sort based on characters, not numbers.
I think Neil Bothwick is right. Also, sorry for the joke earlier. I just
found it ironic that the file sorting in KDE 5 suddenly borked itself
and resembled file sorting in Windows in t
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 08:25:22 AM Philip Webb wrote:
> Using Gwenview with KDE 4, the thumbnail view showed images
> in correct numerical order : image1 image2 ... image9 image10 ... .
> With KDE 5, it's gone stupid : image1 image11 image12 ...
> image 19 image2 image20 image21 ...
>
> Is
On Thursday, 20. Oct 2016, 08:25:22 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> Using Gwenview with KDE 4, the thumbnail view showed images
> in correct numerical order : image1 image2 ... image9 image10 ... .
> With KDE 5, it's gone stupid : image1 image11 image12 ...
> image 19 image2 image20 image21 ...
>
> Is
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:27:34 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> You may be surprised, but this is the proper numerical order - the way
> Windows Explorer normally does it.
Ah well, it must be right then!
> Only the 1st digit is taken into account as you noticed.
All digits are taken into account, but
161020 Michael Mol wrote:
> On 20 October 2016 at 14:25, Philip Webb wrote:
>> Using Gwenview with KDE 4, the thumbnail view showed images
>> in correct numerical order : image1 image2 ... image9 image10 ... .
>> With KDE 5, it's gone stupid : image1 image11 image12 ...
>> image 19 image2 image20
No, it's not the proper numerical order. Yes, it's the proper sort for a
sorting algorithm unaware that it's sorting strings with numeric components,
such as a one examining input on a strictly codepoint-by-codepoint or
character-by-character basis, but that's not the only way to sort.
I'd sugg
You may be surprised, but this is the proper numerical order - the way
Windows Explorer
normally does it. Only the 1st digit is taken into account as you noticed.
Care to try renaming the images to "image_xxx"? Perhaps that helps.
Best regards,
Andy
On 20 October 2016 at 14:25, Philip Webb wrot
Using Gwenview with KDE 4, the thumbnail view showed images
in correct numerical order : image1 image2 ... image9 image10 ... .
With KDE 5, it's gone stupid : image1 image11 image12 ...
image 19 image2 image20 image21 ...
Is there a setting anywhere
to tell it to list files in the proper numerical
12 matches
Mail list logo