On Sonntag 17 Mai 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 03:33:22 pk wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > As I see it, at the bottom of the stack you have a kernel and at the
> > > top a user space app (the X server will do for an example). Plug in a
> > > USB device that the app can u
Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> Dale,
>As far as I can tell I'm not having any problems. This machine was
> using a 2.6.28 kernel up until yesterday when I updated to 2.6.29-r4.
> The point I'm trying to make is that this old driver and all the
> kernels I have used up to now have all worked.
>
>I n
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
>>>
Dale ha scritto:
> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
> friend
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
>>
>>> Dale ha scritto:
>>>
I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and
bn wrote:
> Dale ha scritto:
>
>
>> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
>> friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
>> upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. Sorry, nvidia won't
>> compile with anything newer that I
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
>> Dale ha scritto:
>> > I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
>> > friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
>> > upgraded my kernel to
Alan McKinnon ha scritto:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
>> Dale ha scritto:
>>> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
>>> friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
>>> upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. S
On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
> Dale ha scritto:
> > I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
> > friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
> > upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. Sorry, nvidia won't
> > compil
Dale ha scritto:
> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
> friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
> upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. Sorry, nvidia won't
> compile with anything newer that I have tried.
Uh? las
On Sunday 17 May 2009 14:15:31 pk wrote:
> > But you have that in the current setup. Hal (for better or worse) is the
> > daemon. dbus is simply a message transport and can be omitted from the
> > conceptual diagram
>
> Why is dbus needed? Why can't the user space apps talk to the user space
> daem
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> - only Linux has udev. Other OSes may not need, want or be willing to touch
> udev with a bargepole.
Yes, udev is linux only. Replace udev with whatever is available on
other platforms in that diagram. I just used linux as an example...
Sorry for not making it clear.
> Bu
On Sunday 17 May 2009 03:33:22 pk wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > As I see it, at the bottom of the stack you have a kernel and at the top
> > a user space app (the X server will do for an example). Plug in a USB
> > device that the app can use, and the kernel needs to make a node in /dev
> > for
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> As I see it, at the bottom of the stack you have a kernel and at the top a
> user space app (the X server will do for an example). Plug in a USB device
> that the app can use, and the kernel needs to make a node in /dev for it if
> it's not already there. The kernel shoul
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 16 May 2009 19:14:17 pk wrote:
>
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure who's criticizing DeviceKit, but it isn't me :-)
>>>
>> I guess it was me... :-)
>>
>> I find this thread interesting:
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-Ma
On Saturday 16 May 2009 19:14:17 pk wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I'm not sure who's criticizing DeviceKit, but it isn't me :-)
>
> I guess it was me... :-)
>
> I find this thread interesting:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045561.html
>
> ...especially this:
> http://lis
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm not sure who's criticizing DeviceKit, but it isn't me :-)
I guess it was me... :-)
I find this thread interesting:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045561.html
...especially this:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-May/045574.html
Which
On Friday 15 May 2009, Tony Davison wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 12:25:07 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Is so OBVIOUSLY the correct way to go, and so OBVIOUSLY much easier.
> > > Right? I mean, what kind of twit do you have to be to not un
On Friday 15 May 2009 22:51:41 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Friday 15 May 2009 22:38:30 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> pk wrote:
> >>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> DeviceKit isn't even in portage yet and not many packages support it.
> I don't even know if the devs will
On Friday 15 May 2009 22:38:30 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> pk wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> DeviceKit isn't even in portage yet and not many packages support it. I
> >> don't even know if the devs will change and improve the configs much, if
> >> at all. The problem with hal is that it's code
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 12:25:07 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > Is so OBVIOUSLY the correct way to go, and so OBVIOUSLY much easier.
> > Right? I mean, what kind of twit do you have to be to not understand the
> > hal files?
> >
> >
>
> using
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 13:02:28 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > but my real problem is that hal crap. In their fight to make x 'easier'
> > > they make it harder. keyboard layout is incorrect? well, bad lu
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 13:02:28 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > [...]
> > but my real problem is that hal crap. In their fight to make x 'easier'
> > they make it harder. keyboard layout is incorrect? well, bad luck,
> > because hal's files are a bitch to deal with.
>
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
