On 12/09/2012 05:50:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:18:49 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> config_wlan0="192.168.1.3 netmsk 255.255.255.0"
^
If this is a direct paste from your config, there's the problem.
Thanks Neil for spotting this. It was
On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 Dec 2012 15:30:04 Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>> On 12/4/2012 06:11, Florian Philipp wrote:
>> > Do you actually need broadcom-sta anymore? With the recent kernel
>> > updates more chips work with the in-kernel driver (brcmsmac). But the
>> > config option is
On Tuesday 11 Dec 2012 09:04:59 Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 Dec 2012 15:30:04 Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> >> On 12/4/2012 06:11, Florian Philipp wrote:
> >> > Do you actually need broadcom-sta anymore? With the recent kernel
> >> > updates more chips work with t
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 01:14:39 PM IST, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
>> and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
>>
>> The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to
>> mo
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 01:14:39 PM IST, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
>>> and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
>>>
>>> The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 04:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> What is the end-result without the lines?
>
>
localmount fails at mounting /var /home and /tmp (while swap gets
mounted which is *also* on LVM because lvm starts up before the swap
gets activated).
>
> I use an older version still.
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 04:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> Which metadata version did you use for the software raid setup?
>>
>> Can you add "mdadm" to the boot-runlevel?
>>
>
> I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is
> kernel based autodetect.
Ouch, auto-detect d
For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to
extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The
latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking things
so if ifconfig cant be relied on, what's normally used to extract an
interfaces IP addre
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:33:15 +0800
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to
> extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The
> latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking
> things so if ifconfig cant b
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is
> > kernel based autodetect.
>
> Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
> Please read the man-page section:
>
> Please rebuild the raid-device using v0.90
On 12/11/2012 12:33:15 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to
extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The
latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking
things
so if ifconfig cant be relied on,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:08:12 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> > > I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is
> > > kernel based autodetect.
> >
> > Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
> > Please rea
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
> Please read the man-page section:
> ===
> --auto-detect
> Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected arrays. This can only
> work if md is compiled into the kernel - not if
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:57 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:08:12 +
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is
kernel based autodetect.
>>>
>>> Ou
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
>> Please read the man-page section:
>> ===
>> --auto-detect
>> Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected arrays. This can
>> only
>> work if md is compiled into the kerne
On Dec 11, 2012 7:57 AM, "Nilesh Govindrajan" wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >
> > Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2.
> > Please read the man-page section:
> > ===
> > --auto-detect
> > Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected arr
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
> > emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set
> > emerge: no targets left after set expansion
>
> So you have nothing that needs rebuilding. Portage will warn you when the
> set it
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> > "I have these disks, use 'em. When I've figured out the actual
> > quotas and sizes I need, I'll let you know. Meanwhile just get on
> > with it and store my stuff in some reasonable fashion, 'mkay?
> > kthankxbye! I have real work
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:36:10 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
> > So you have nothing that needs rebuilding. Portage will warn you when
> > the set is non-empty, telling you to run emerge @preserved-rebuild.
> > There is no need to run it at any other time.
>
> After using Gentoo for close to two years
Issue resolved guys. Thanks to J. Roeleveld for pointing out that auto
detection is failing.
I built an initramfs using genkernel with raid and lvm support and added
options domdadm & lvmraid.
It works flawlessly now.
Thanks! :-)
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
http://nileshgr.com
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:33:15 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote about
"[gentoo-user] ifconfig and ppp0 address":
>For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to
>extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The
>latest update has changed the output format of ifc
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
Exactly the reason why I wanted RAID0 and LVM in combination: more
IOPS. ZFS looks very interesting, how stable is it?
On Linux, not at all (it doesn't exist there except using fuse)
On FreeBSD, rock solid.
On
On 12/11/2012 08:36 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
>>> emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set
>>> emerge: no targets left after set expansion
>>
>> So you have nothing that needs rebuild
Hello list
Long time no read... :)
It follows a verbose preamble. For the actual questions see dashed line below.
TL;DR summary: it’s all about ricer-performance questions on a netbook.
I have the luck of having obtained a used netbook for free (Atom N450, single-
core with HT, 1 GB memory, 54
Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes:
> Then use burnp6. Or burnmmx. Same packacke. No winecrap.
OK thanks for the input.
Thank for all the help.
James
> I can send you the source code if you want. Likewise to any other
> interested reader
Send to me please, Thanks
--
___
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to hand
On 12/11/2012 03:04, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote:
This sounds scary!!! Isn't there a way of disabling this feature in
the BIOS?
With HP, you don't even get a BIOS setup. You get something that tells
you the processor temperature and possibly lets you change the boot
order.
> > If my package.mask is empty, eix-test-obsolete runs fine. If I have
> > this in package.mask:
> >
> > */*::init6
> >
> > eix-test-obsolete find over 27,000 packages under this heading:
> >
> > Redundant in /etc/portage/package.mask:
> > ... considered as REDUNDANT_IF_MASK_NO_CHANGE
> >
> > Add
On 11 December 2012 12:36, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Hello list
. . .
> So I’m interested in you opinion and own experience about the following
> arising questions:
>
> * From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an
> Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to a
>> in package.mask:
>>
>> */*::init6
>>
>> eix-test-obsolete find over 27,000 packages under this heading:
>>
>> Redundant in /etc/portage/package.mask:
>> ... considered as REDUNDANT_IF_MASK_NO_CHANGE
>
>
> The reason for this is the following:
> Since the category and package is */*, your mask ca
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I was using eix a bit ago and I noticed the colors have changed. Since
> I like to have white text and a black background, this is not working to
> well for me. It seems some of the output is black text. Put black text
> on a black backgr
>> > This really freaks out eix-test-obsolete. Does anyone know of a way to
>> > install only certain packages from a layman overlay and
>> > use eix-test-obsolete?
>>
>> I don't add such overlays to make conf. Instead, I symlink directories
for
>> the packages I want into my local overlay.
>>
>
>
Am 11.12.2012 18:36, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> Hello list
>
> Long time no read... :)
>
> It follows a verbose preamble. For the actual questions see dashed line
> below.
> TL;DR summary: it’s all about ricer-performance questions on a netbook.
>
>
> I have the luck of having obtained a u
I have: Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz
running it with:
CFLAGS="-march=core2 -O2 -pipe"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
MAKEOPTS="-j5"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
Didn't run any test performance on it, but the only disappointing fact about
this small box is that it will not reboot itself when the power goe
I also get 376 matches from "Not installed but in
/etc/portage/package.mask" which are surely the packages in my overlays
masked by */* but not installed. Do you know the name of this test so I
can disable it in eixrc?
REDUNDANT_IF_IN_MASK (or in /etc/portage/package.nowarn: in_mask)
I thin
Is there a way to remove "Cron " from the subject line of
crontab mail without piping each cron job to 'mail'?
I set 'usermod -c hostname root' on each of my systems so that the From:
line displays "hostname" for crontab mail. This works on each system
except the mail server itself which still sh
>> I think what we really need is a better way
>> to install only certain packages from an overlay.
>
> This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain packages
> copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole overlay
> to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do n
Well I have a gentoo system I'm trying to recover.
I've got it booted up via systemrescue.
I do not have a copy of the fstab, so what is the best
way to discover which partitions are /boot / and so on?
(brain dead tonight)
I guesses but the / is blank?
df
/dev/sda2 61438696 5
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:32:01 -0800, Grant wrote:
> > This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain
> > packages copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole
> > overlay to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do not use
> > eclasses or other ebuilds from the
mount them and see whats there?
also, what order did you mount them in? it may make a difference
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, James wrote:
> Well I have a gentoo system I'm trying to recover.
> I've got it booted up via systemrescue.
>
> I do not have a copy of the fstab, so what is the bes
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:48:03PM +, James wrote:
>
> I guesses but the / is blank?
>
> df
> /dev/sda2 61438696 51276944 10161752 84% /mnt/gentoo/boot
> /dev/sda3 61438696 51276944 10161752 84% /mnt/gentoo
>
>
> /mnt/gentoo/boot is populated (mounted correctl
> mount them and see whats there?
>
Also, check the partition table to see which one is swap, and what other
partitions exist.
> > > This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain
> > > packages copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole
> > > overlay to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do not use
> > > eclasses or other ebuilds from the overlay which might contain
> > > correspo
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:20:55PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > * From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an
> > Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to assume thus that the Atom
> > architecture doesn’t have much to offer to 64 bit (such as extra
> >
Bruce Hill happypenguincomputers.com> writes:
> Start by issuing "blkid" to determine what partitions are there. If you use -L
> with mkfs. then you should have a label, such as this:
> peter ~ # blkid
> /dev/sda1: LABEL="root" UUID="73362905-79dc-4512-9518-4c040963f80e"
> TYPE="xfs"
I used
OK so lots of updates (mostly kde 4.9.3)
to several systems today. 2 or the 3 are fine
One got hosed. Error message upon reboot
config_devdmpfs=y is required in your kernel configuration
for this version of udev to run successfully
this requires immediate action
mdev: sys/class no such file mdev
James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
> looking into : /mnt/gentoo/new/usr/portage/sys-fs/udev
> I cannot tell what version of udev (udev mount)
> and others (udev-init-scipts ?) were installed
> and how to roll this back.
OK so on one of my working systems, I have
sys-fs/udev-171-r9 installed. So I
On Wednesday 12 December 2012 08:07:46 AM IST, James wrote:
>
> OK so lots of updates (mostly kde 4.9.3)
> to several systems today. 2 or the 3 are fine
>
> One got hosed. Error message upon reboot
>
> config_devdmpfs=y is required in your kernel configuration
> for this version of udev to run succ
On Wednesday 12 December 2012 08:19 AM, James wrote:
> James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
>
>
>> looking into : /mnt/gentoo/new/usr/portage/sys-fs/udev
>> I cannot tell what version of udev (udev mount)
>> and others (udev-init-scipts ?) were installed
>> and how to roll this back.
>
> OK so on on
On 12/11/2012 04:15 PM, Grant wrote:
> Is there a way to remove "Cron " from the subject line of
> crontab mail without piping each cron job to 'mail'?
>
> I set 'usermod -c hostname root' on each of my systems so that the From:
> line displays "hostname" for crontab mail. This works on each syst
For some reason, when I mount floppy disk (standard HD 3.5" VFAT disk)
it does nothing. No error, just nothing... I have not tried this in
well over a year, but it used to work.
The /dev/fd0 device works normally, I can access it with mtools and
use dd and even access disks in virtual machines run
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:46:19 -0500
Randy Barlow wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530
> > Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> >> Exactly the reason why I wanted RAID0 and LVM in combination: more
> >> IOPS. ZFS looks very interesting, how stable is it?
> >
> > On Linux, no
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:36:10 -0600
Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >
> > > workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild
> > > emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set
> > > emerge: no targets left after set expansion
> >
> > So you have no
53 matches
Mail list logo